TR Sensors and Detector Programs

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,732
Reactions
94 9,030
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
ASELSAN-EIRS-Erken-Ihbar-Radar-Sistemi-3-750x422.jpg


The first of Turkey's long-range Early Warning Radar System (EIRS) has been deployed to Adana!

The EIRS system, an AESA radar developed by ASELSAN, will replace the TRS-22XX radars produced in Turkey with the French Thales license. In this context, according to the information obtained by Defense Turk, it completed the first EIRS factory acceptance tests and replaced a TRS-XX22 radar stationed in Adana with temporary acceptance.

EIRS, a new generation S-Band radar developed for long-range early warning purposes, with antenna architecture in AESA and digital beamforming infrastructure, is planned to have a target detection range of 470+ km and to be used at a range of up to 600+ km in various situations. EIRS, which will also be used in roles such as detection and tracking of ballistic missiles, will also play a critical role in the detection of targets with low radar cross-sectional area.

Speaking at the 4th Military Radar and Border Security summit, ASELSAN Deputy General Manager Dr. Mustafa Akkul also stated that the number of portable EIRS and fixed EIRS production numbers will be around 18 until 2030. Akkul stated that there are 4000 T/R modules in ERİS and even if 20% of these modules are broken, the radar can continue to operate with only 10% change in range. In the old generation PESA radars, there is a single source and receiver. Therefore, if a source is damaged, the radar becomes ineffective.

Native GaN Transistors started to be used in EIRS

Akkul also announced in the scope of the summit that the first S band domestic transistors produced by AB Mikronano had begun to be used in radars. According to the information obtained by Defense Turk, domestic GaN transistors have started to be used in the ASELSAN Early Warning Radar System (EIRS).

Excellent news, i guess if it was completed couple of years ago we could have order these instead of Thales GM radars.
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,061
Solutions
1
Reactions
34 14,465
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
470km for 1 square meter target for wide area search. 600km if the beam is concentrated to an undisclosed x-degree arc.
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,463
Reactions
14 2,790
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
470km for 1 square meter target for wide area search. 600km if the beam is concentrated to an undisclosed x-degree arc.
Could you drop some links or provide sources for "470km for 1 square meter"? Because if true then this is a really big achievement
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,061
Solutions
1
Reactions
34 14,465
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I can't because it is my personal source.
BTW I'm also somewhat skeptical but he insisted that there is more to EIRS than it is revealed. EIRS has better performance than the radar of S-400(they have on-field performance data of S-400 radar). That is why Aselsan CEO says we don't need S-400 anymore.

Some more info. Some capabilities of the radar are at the T/R module level and some capabilities are at the building block level. Aselsans architecture revolves around T/R modules coming together to form building blocks. I don't know if it is the same for other big AESA radar producers. Every T/R module can be controlled independently for some functions but can only be controlled at the building block level for others.

We don't have the building block specs but if it is similar to MURAD AESA building blocks (16 T/R modules per block) EIRS might have 250 building blocks (4000T/R modules) another alternative might be 256 building blocks for 4096 T/R modules (Well digital design works like 8-16-32-64-128-256-512-1024-2048-4096)

18 EIRS will be delivered by 2030 both in fixed and mobile versions.
 
Last edited:

godel44

Active member
Messages
141
Reactions
8 449
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
470km for 1 square meter target for wide area search. 600km if the beam is concentrated to an undisclosed x-degree arc.
If I remember the radar formula correctly (and I might not be), the maximum range is linear in RCS^(1/4). So if 470 km for 1 m2 is correct, it would mean 264 km for 0.1 m2, 149 km for 0.01, and 84 km for 0.001. I don't know what the RCS of F-35 is in the S-band, but there seems to be a good chance of detecting at 100+ km.
 

YeşilVatan

Contributor
Messages
663
Reactions
16 1,666
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
If I remember the radar formula correctly (and I might not be), the maximum range is linear in RCS^(1/4). So if 470 km for 1 m2 is correct, it would mean 264 km for 0.1 m2, 149 km for 0.01, and 84 km for 0.001. I don't know what the RCS of F-35 is in the S-band, but there seems to be a good chance of detecting at 100+ km.
In theory, wouldn't that allow us to deny F-35's airpace? Considering the radar itself is protected against deep strikes etc.?
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,061
Solutions
1
Reactions
34 14,465
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
ASELSAN-Ag-Tabanli-Dagitik-Radar-Uygulamalari-2048x1203.jpg


Network-Based Distributed Radar Applications
*Resource Optimization via Joint Management
*Plot and/or Data Fusion
*Hypersonic Target and Ballistic Missile Handover
*Time, Frequency, and Waveform Synchronization.

*Coverage Optimization
*High Performance
-Resistance to jamming
-Variety in the geometry of detection
*Endurance

ASELSAN-Multistatki-Radar-2048x1180.jpg


Multistatik Radar ( Radar system which has transmitters and receivers in separate locations)
More resistant to Radar EW Systems ( Radar Jammers)
Geometry advantage against stealth technology

*Coverage area
*Scan time
-Transmitter can be omni (omni-directional)
-Multistatic MIMO (Multiple input multiple output)
*Communication
*Synchronization
-Time, frequency
-Phase, beam
*Noise elimination/filtering
*Separation (noise separation)

Göndermeç=Transmitter
Almaç=Receiver
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,732
Reactions
94 9,030
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
In theory, wouldn't that allow us to deny F-35's airpace? Considering the radar itself is protected against deep strikes etc.?
Well, there are some catches.

1. FCR also has to be able to provide fire control solutions At 100+km against F35.

2. In the near future NGJ is going to be integrated with F35s

3. I believe in SEAD/DEAD mission USAF can simply overwhelm the adversary's interceptors.
 
Last edited:

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,061
Solutions
1
Reactions
34 14,465
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
If I remember the radar formula correctly (and I might not be), the maximum range is linear in RCS^(1/4). So if 470 km for 1 m2 is correct, it would mean 264 km for 0.1 m2, 149 km for 0.01, and 84 km for 0.001. I don't know what the RCS of F-35 is in the S-band, but there seems to be a good chance of detecting at 100+ km.
Yes one of the selling points of EIRS is the detection of targets with low RCS. 100+km is still the stand-off range for F-35.

As you guys can see Aselsans network-based radar application is not a basic lets hook-up all of the radars to the network and paint a big picture with what all of the radars can see.
 
Last edited:

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,732
Reactions
94 9,030
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
If I remember the radar formula correctly (and I might not be), the maximum range is linear in RCS^(1/4). So if 470 km for 1 m2 is correct, it would mean 264 km for 0.1 m2, 149 km for 0.01, and 84 km for 0.001. I don't know what the RCS of F-35 is in the S-band, but there seems to be a good chance of detecting at 100+ km.
We should remember F-35s supposed 0.001 RCS only from the frontal angle.

Ground Radars looks up at somewhat different angle than the direct frontal angle.
 

Heartbang

Experienced member
Messages
2,554
Reactions
8 3,971
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
If I remember the radar formula correctly (and I might not be), the maximum range is linear in RCS^(1/4). So if 470 km for 1 m2 is correct, it would mean 264 km for 0.1 m2, 149 km for 0.01, and 84 km for 0.001. I don't know what the RCS of F-35 is in the S-band, but there seems to be a good chance of detecting at 100+ km.

In theory, wouldn't that allow us to deny F-35's airpace? Considering the radar itself is protected against deep strikes etc.?

Well, there are some catches.

1. FCR also has to be able to provide fire control solutions At 100+km against F35.

2. In the near future NGJ is going to be integrated with F35s

3. I believe in SEAD/DEAD mission USAF can simply overwhelm the adversary's interceptors.

f-35clean-with-mnzn-ram-1.png


with the data at hand, its fair to say that EIRS is a good counter to F-35. Those DSI's do pop out :)

 

godel44

Active member
Messages
141
Reactions
8 449
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
We should remember F-35s supposed 0.001 RCS only from the frontal angle.

Ground Radars looks up at somewhat different angle than the direct frontal angle.
0.0015 in X-band if I recall correctly. With concentration on an arc, it gives almost 120 km even with that RCS. But as you said, detecting it and directing a Siper missile to it are two different things. Hopefully the people who made EIRS put some thought in how to use the FCR better as well.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,732
Reactions
94 9,030
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
with the data at hand, its fair to say that EIRS is a good counter to F-35.

f-35clean-with-mnzn-ram-1.png
Bro, I actually read that article before. But the thing is, as he mnetioned clearly, this chart is without taking into account ultra-modern RAM coating ( Except for the inner surface of the inlet duct, even though it was only mnZn RAM ) that F-35 has on its fuselage.

I mean it is no secret US was working on RAM coating for 4 decade now and they are ahead of everybody by far in this regard.

And F-35s RAM coating is optimized against S and X Band.

He also said,
"keep in mind though the actual RAM used on stealth aircraft may have absorbing rating of-15 to -25 dB depend on the actual frequency"

And i am gonna say this is actually a conservative estimate given how far US advanced in the field of RAM development.

And if we take cutting age RAM into consideration. Let's say it reduced the F-35s frontal RCS by -20dB against S Band.

And this is f-35s frontal RCS against S Band without RAM.
1679951582376.png

  • S-band result of clean F-35 in Case 2 (-20° to +20° horizontal arc, -20° to +20° vertical arc)
So, now on top of that with RAM reducing -20dB....well, you can do the math on your own.

There are saying of USAF generals were they claimed, F-35 is the most stealthiest jet in US inventory.


Note, please don't misunderstand the purpose of this post. I am not on a campaign to discredit ERIS's capability.
It is an excellent radar with cutting age GaN based dual axis AESA technology.
 
Last edited:

Heartbang

Experienced member
Messages
2,554
Reactions
8 3,971
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
(-20° to +20° horizontal arc, -20° to +20° vertical arc)
We don't have high enough mountains to make the EIRS detect the F-35 from those arcs.
You do have a point, but one must also remember that these graphs do(suspiciously) top out at +/- 22 degree arcs. Further simulations are needed.
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,017
Reactions
8 3,633
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
@Nutuk , maybe you remember our discussion, if SIPER is ready to replace S-400.
About S-400 I think it is too preliminary to say we don't need it.

In wartime a 380km range AD missile can come in very handy, for one it can create a no go zone for the enemy (unless they have drones like we do). We think too much that AD missiles are only used to down aircraft and tend to forget about the airspace denial aspect (closing of airspace) which is as important.

Even if the S-400 is not integrated into the Siper system, it will be an utmost handy tool to be used next to it in the mentioned airspace denial.
 

Oublious

Experienced member
The Netherlands Correspondent
Messages
2,157
Reactions
8 4,654
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bro, I actually read that article before. But the thing is, as he mnetioned clearly, this chart is without taking into account ultra-modern RAM coating ( Except for the inner surface of the inlet duct, even though it was only mnZn RAM ) that F-35 has on its fuselage.

I mean it is no secret US was working on RAM coating for 4 decade now and they are ahead of everybody by far in this regard.

And F-35s RAM coating is optimized against S and X Band.

He also said,
"keep in mind though the actual RAM used on stealth aircraft may have absorbing rating of-15 to -25 dB depend on the actual frequency"

And i am gonna say this is actually a conservative estimate given how far US advanced in the field of RAM development.

And if we take cutting age RAM into consideration. Let's say it reduced the F-35s frontal RCS by -20dB against S Band.

And this is f-35s frontal RCS against S Band without RAM.
View attachment 55474
  • S-band result of clean F-35 in Case 2 (-20° to +20° horizontal arc, -20° to +20° vertical arc)
So, now on top of that with RAM reducing -20dB....well, you can do the math on your own.

There are saying of USAF generals were they claimed, F-35 is the most stealthy jet in US inventory.


Note, please don't misunderstand the purpose of this post. I am not on a campaign to discredit ERIS's capability.
It is an excellent radar with cutting age GaN based dual axis AESA technology.



So you are blindly accepting what they are saying? Did you asked proof or source from them?
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,732
Reactions
94 9,030
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
So you are blindly accepting what they are saying? Did you asked proof or source from them?
Nope, it is the article that @Heartbang Brought up.

We were disscusing in light of that.

He used it as reference in his post so naturally I did too.

Besides, there is nothing to accept blindly about these highly classified strategic technologies. All we can do is to make the best guesstimate we can based on data on hand.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom