TR Sensors and Detector Programs

Quasar 

Contributor
Moderator
Messages
916
Reactions
54 4,011
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
This is already covered ...........what C in R ( C ) stands for is a calculation...... this calculatons involves EO/IR line of sight (LOS) angle i.e azimuth and elevation angles, Platform GPS/INS position and slant range estimation.

''No matter the distance''? Yes and No! The calculation is distance independent, but the resulting error is not!!!

Even in an ordinary day and under normai circumstances Error stack problem occures i.e stacking of LOS angular error (microradians), Lateral position error, INS drift, Platform attitude error even with high-grade tactical INS or GPS.... And Error stack problem is not very distance friendly since even very minimal errors ends up with significant results with distance, this does not mean the imperfection of Aselfilir 600 but simple physics.

ASELFLIR has exceptional and excellent ISR quality and perfect to cue the network..... this is simply the essence of it

With Ahmet Akyol's words: ''ASELFLIR-600 provides Turkey's UAVs and attack platforms with strategic depth target detection and identification capabilities.''
 
Last edited:

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,830
Solutions
1
Reactions
47 16,809
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
This is already covered ...........what C in R ( C ) stands for is a calculation...... this calculatons involves EO/IR line of sight (LOS) angle i.e azimuth and elevation angles, Platform GPS/INS position and slant range estimation.

''No matter the distance''? Yes and No! The calculation is distance independent, but the resulting error is not!!!

Even in an ordinary day and under normai circumstances Error stack problem occures i.e stacking of LOS angular error (microradians), Lateral position error, INS drift, Platform attitude error even with high-grade tactical INS or GPS.... And Error stack problem is not very distance friendly since even very minimal errors ends up with significant results with distance, this does not mean the imperfection of Aselfilir 600 but simple physics.

ASELFLIR has exceptional and excellent ISR quality and perfect to cue the network..... this is simply the essence of it

With Ahmet Akyol's words: ''ASELFLIR-600 provides Turkey's UAVs and attack platforms with strategic depth target detection and identification capabilities.''
This is wrong. You first have to learn how geo-location in Aselflir-600 works. This is not how it works. This is how Aselflir-300T works. Aselflir has sensor fusion based advanced geo-locating capability.
*Error stack problems occur.
It does not occur because it is not how it works.

Welcome to 21st century where we have sensor fusion, where drones can cruise without GPS data, where we can get every kind of positional data through platforms' own (jam resistant GPS/INS sensors,altimeters etc) sensors, through datalinks from ground or other aircraft, through satcom, where we have highly detailed(1cm to 1m level) maps on board platforms so that we can compare our relative position to what we see. You see that hill in the picture? Aselflir-600 knows the exact coordinates of that hill from 225km away and Aselflir knows the coordinates of a possible target (an object with a size similar to a MBT), with an error rate of 3 to 4 meters.
 

Quasar 

Contributor
Moderator
Messages
916
Reactions
54 4,011
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
This is wrong. You first have to learn how geo-location in Aselflir-600 works. This is not how it works. This is how Aselflir-300T works. Aselflir has sensor fusion based advanced geo-locating capability.
*Error stack problems occur.
It does not occur because it is not how it works.

Welcome to 21st century where we have sensor fusion, where drones can cruise without GPS data, where we can get every kind of positional data through platforms' own (jam resistant GPS/INS sensors,altimeters etc) sensors, through datalinks from ground or other aircraft, through satcom, where we have highly detailed(1cm to 1m level) maps on board platforms so that we can compare our relative position to what we see. You see that hill in the picture? Aselflir-600 knows the exact coordinates of that hill from 225km away and Aselflir knows the coordinates of a possible target (an object with a size similar to a MBT), with an error rate of 3 to 4 meters.

Concerning the real distinction between ASELFLIR-300T and ASELFLIR-600

The improvement is not that ASELFLIR-600 “doesn’t have error stacks'' The real advances are: Multi-frame temporal fusion, Terrain-aided navigation, Cooperative cueing and updates, Better attitude knowledge and stabilization and Smarter uncertainty management... Error propagation is controlled not eliminated.

ASELFLIR-600 significantly reduces geolocation uncertainty through multi-source sensor fusion, but it remains bounded by geometry, observability, and physics. Errors are managed probabilistically, not eliminated.

rest of your post is word salad or information and concepts used without their true and full connctions to their contextes or their true relations with each other.
 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom