TR Space Space Programs

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,009
Reactions
64 7,319
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
bigger budget, man power and experience.
 

Rodeo

Contributor
Moderator
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
1,235
Reactions
30 4,733
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What is the reason why you think so, they have cheaper human capital costs or what?
You need to read more about their achievements. Seeing them as a rival is ridiculous. We should have our own pace and rockets tailored for our needs. Talking about human spaceflight at this stage will only discredit our work.
 

Agha Sher

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,684
Reactions
10 9,113
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
I don't think TUA can overtake ISRO in the next two decades, if ever.

Not TUA, but whatever that might come out of an intense collaboration between Turkiye, Azerbaijan, Qatar, KSA, Malaysia and Indonesia.

Such an alliance would in a decade do marvelous things.

ISRO is working at a very slow pace. Their main pride is that they are doing things with small a budget
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,457
Reactions
6 7,125
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I know quite a bit about their achievements.

If we can find some oil and gas anytime soon Türkiye can even catch up with India in a decade with our own resources.
 

Rodeo

Contributor
Moderator
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
1,235
Reactions
30 4,733
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I know quite a bit about their achievements.

If we can find some oil and gas anytime soon Türkiye can even catch up with India in a decade with our own resources.
Money is not the problem. Even if you had two decades and a one trillion dollars budget, you couldn't land an astronaut to the moon by your own means. Developing the necessary technologies cannot be compressed into a decade, no matter how much money you throw at it. It's like Greece claiming they will develop a 6th gen fighter because of some money they inherited. They couldn't do it because they don't have the infrastructure, knowledge, experience.

This is not a subject of discussion for this decade. At first, we should reach the orbit. Talking about outer-space colonization is not very realistic, to say the least.
 
Last edited:

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,457
Reactions
6 7,125
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Money is not the problem. Even if you had two decades and a one trillion dollars budget, you couldn't land an astronaut to the moon by your own means. Developing the necessary technologies cannot be compressed into a decade, no matter how much money you have. It's like Greece claiming they will develop a 6th gen fighter because of some money they inherited. They couldn't do it because they don't have the infrastructure, knowledge, experience.

This is not a subject of discussion for this decade. At first, we should reach the orbit. Talking about outer-space colonization is not very realistic, to say the least.

Look how SpaceX is compressing time, it only depends on how much you try.
 

Agha Sher

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,684
Reactions
10 9,113
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
Look how SpaceX is compressing time, it only depends on how much you try.

Exactly, these people insist that space is hard.

SpaceX and RocketLab has made a fool out of all these so-called space agencies consuming billions a year without delivering results.

Baykar likewise, has made a fool out of old traditional defense companies by rapidly innovating and rapidly reiterating. Baykar is entering the space industry and they are working on some shocking projects already - expect Turkey to be ahead of india in 10 years.
 

what

Experienced member
Moderator
Messages
2,042
Reactions
9 6,042
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Easier to successfully start a space company with billions in the pocket from the taxpayer, existing infrastructure and NASA engineers. Step by step, no rush.
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
3,808
Solutions
1
Reactions
27 13,681
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
We shouldn't focus on manned spaceflight. We should concentrate on sending our own satellites to various orbits with our own launcher solutions starting from LEO orbit with up to 250kg mini-satellites(similar to Starlink sats) if we can send several of them (2-6) at the same time to LEO orbit this will be a huge win. Later we should build on that and send big sats(1000-1500kg) to GEO.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,138
Solutions
2
Reactions
95 22,890
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,457
Reactions
6 7,125
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Manned flight is a hard job so it will only happen once we can launch around 10 tons of load to Low Orbit where space stations live. Perhaps a crew vehicle that will spend a week or two in orbit and glide back down can be made then.
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,304
Reactions
96 18,875
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
Easier to successfully start a space company with billions in the pocket from the taxpayer, existing infrastructure and NASA engineers. Step by step, no rush.

+1 .

Fun to read some of the replies on this thread though lol.
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
2,830
Reactions
20 8,214
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
0


Moon mission vessel
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom