With MMU we can use "loyal wingman" dronesHow is MMU going to be better than F35 thats just cope
Can you do that with F35? (US possibly can, but anyone else?)
Latest Thread
With MMU we can use "loyal wingman" dronesHow is MMU going to be better than F35 thats just cope
That still doesn't make mmu better than F35With MMU we can use "loyal wingman" drones
Can you do that with F35? (US possibly can, but anyone else?)
Well you should care about those engineers since they and their CAD capabilities are far superior to your eyesJust compare TFX gear to F35 you I don't care about the engineers
It is MMU's MADL or DAS hole?Quick answer: no.
Could be the datalink arrayIt is MMU's MADL or DAS hole?
So what is it?Could be the datalink array
SorrySo what is it?
You think they didn't calculate what the gears can endure? Quit your nonsense...Gears doesnt look sturdy
Kf21-F22-J20-F35 all of their landing gear looks sturdy even su 57s I doubt those gears can hold on when flying with full combat loadoutWell you should care about those engineers since they and their CAD capabilities are far superior to your eyes
Why would I compare it to the F-35? Are we trying to replicate that platform?
So criticizing is nonsense? Never seen americans or others do the same when you point something outYou think they didn't calculate what the gears can endure? Quit your nonsense...
oh, okaySorry
Listen... If you:So criticizing is nonsense? Never seen americans or others do the same when you point something out
I'm not an aviation expert. But i think if the engineers working on such a project make obvious mistakes that a person like you can see with naked eye, you can be sure that that plane will not be able to fly, even if does never be able to enter the TSK inventory. So if you want the project to be successful you should care about those engineers.Just compare TFX gear to F35 you I don't care about the engineers
You look at pictures and make guesstimates.So criticizing is nonsense? Never seen americans or others do the same when you point something out
I can criticize anything there is something called freedom of speech that you people can't seem to understand.Listen... If you:
i) don't have the same resources as TAI,
ii) are not a member of the program management office,
iii) have not taken part on the structural analysis they did on every single component,
you absolutely CAN NOT criticize this aircraft. You can point stuff out, but you can't criticize anything without sufficient proof or knowledge.
And why would TAI and TAAC waste time developing not-so-sturdy landing gears when they have the money and resources to do so? It would be a waste of time and effort.
TF-X program consists of THOUSANDS of people who work internally. There are also hundreds of external personnel. So you're telling me, none of these engineers (even the ones with prior knowledge with the F-35) took a look at those platforms. Well I'm here to correct you... TAI analyzed every 5th gen fighter/ program out there. Criticizing individual elements is worthless and debating upon these subjects is time consuming.
You look at pictures and make guesstimates.
I can criticize anything there is something called freedom of speech that you people can't seem to understand.
In the comparison you're showing, the TF-X visually has sturdier landing gears than the F-22.View attachment 55830
NOO YOU CAN'T CRITICIZE MY JET
Here is a comparison of Fifth gen landing gears you said those landing gear wouldn't change
Im saying that In the future block 10 will have buffier gears.
1: Just because you have the right to do something doesn't mean you should keep doing it. Imagine a country in which no laws exist, and you steal something. You might have the right to steal, but it won't be ethical or correct.
2: No one is trying to silence you. Freedom of speech also applies to me. And again this doesn't change the fact that your argument is vague. If you're being argumentative, then you should expect negative feedback. It's how it goes.
The points I made still stand.