TR TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,344
Reactions
79 10,741
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I agree A2G should be seconday concern. As the Air Force will have that covered with KE, ANKA-III and other drones in the inventory and possibly Armed Hürjet as well as the F-16 fleet.
Ability to speedily and stealthily carry 8 Tolun SDBs or 2 Mk-84 HGKs will always be important. I don't expect A2G role for Kaan to be put on the back burner.
 

Boz

Committed member
DH Visual Specialist
Messages
275
Reactions
20 2,558
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
And the beast
Yes.
2.png

Air.png
 

fushkee

Committed member
Messages
173
Reactions
4 255
Nation of residence
Qatar
Nation of origin
Turkey
Those who lives in neighborhood near TAI facilities should have their cameras and çekirdek in order to witness a historical step on that day...
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,683
Reactions
7 7,389
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
A link to the live countdown timer is included in my signature section
 

fushkee

Committed member
Messages
173
Reactions
4 255
Nation of residence
Qatar
Nation of origin
Turkey
I hope the final decision won’t happen like Hurkus-1 and Hurkus-2
 

wolveray1

Committed member
Messages
163
Reactions
5 473
Nation of residence
Malaysia
Nation of origin
Malaysia

Korean would start soon,we should hurry up
So maybe instead of buying F16 or Eurofighter...just buy from korea.
Its the same latest 4.5 generation fighter and more stealthy too....Certainly less political problem than buying from european or american.
 

IC3M@N FX

Committed member
Messages
219
Reactions
8 414
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
There are many US components in the Korean aircraft, from the engine to the AESA radar, etc.
Here South Korea would get an export stop from the USA.

Either we then develop a much smaller KAAN, e.g. KAAN S from 2028/29, with a detailed canard design and single jet. Or we use the Russians e.g. the SU 35S modified with Turkish software, fire control system & avionics etc. then we would definitely be out of NATO, at the moment they still tolerate us even if we don't dance to their tune.

The second possibility would be the Pakistani JF17 Thunder modified with Turkish software, fire control system & avionics etc. but here it would not be an upgrade in the real sense, the JF17 is really a good aircraft for the money, but it is slightly below the performance of an F-16. Block 50+ and against Block 70+ /Block Özgur it would unfortunately be totally inferior.
The JF17 would have no chance against Greece or countries like Saudi Arabia, Israel & Co with F-16 Block 70 or Eurofighter Block 4, let alone against the F-35.
You would have to tune it up so much that you could develop a completely new aircraft right away.
 

IC3M@N FX

Committed member
Messages
219
Reactions
8 414
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Korean aircraft contain many US components, from the engine to the AESA radar, etc.
Here South Korea would get an export ban from the USA.

Either we then develop a much smaller KAAN, e.g. KAAN S from 2028/29, with a Delta Canard design and with a single jet. Or we take a Russian fighter jet, e.g. the SU 35S, modified with Turkish software, fire control system & avionics etc.
But then we would definitely be out of NATO, at the moment they still tolerate us, even if we don't dance to their tune.

The second option would be the Pakistani JF17 Thunder, modified with Turkish software, fire control system and avionics etc, but here it would not be an upgrade in the true sense, the JF17 is really a good aircraft for the money, but it is slightly below the performance of an F-16. Block 50+ and against Block 70+ /Block Özgur it would unfortunately be completely inferior.
The JF17 would have no chance against Greece or countries like Saudi Arabia, Israel & Co with their F-16 Block 70 or Eurofighter Block 4, let alone against the F-35.
It would have to be optimized so much that a completely new aircraft could be developed with the money.
We definitely need another single jet fighter between the KAAN and the F-16.
Neither Hürjet nor Kizilelma/Anka 3 as a fighter aircraft can fill this gap.
 
Last edited:

DBdev

Committed member
Messages
298
Reactions
8 522
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
So maybe instead of buying F16 or Eurofighter...just buy from korea.
Its the same latest 4.5 generation fighter and more stealthy too....Certainly less political problem than buying from european or american.
Anything not on par with Greek's F-35s and American's F-22s is a no starter for Türkiye. They will just be shiny flying coffins, not fighter jets.
 

IC3M@N FX

Committed member
Messages
219
Reactions
8 414
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
TAI KAAN as a 5+ generation fighter would have to have an engine of at least 18000 lbf to remain competitive, in principle 80 kn dry and 36000 lbf 160 kn with an afterburner.
I don't know whether our engineers will be able to achieve this so easily in 6-8 years - that's a lot.
Is the TEI TF 6000 engine already installed in the Anka 3 prototype?
 

BaburKhan

Contributor
Messages
450
Reactions
5 1,067
Website
strategicreviewturkey.blogspot.com
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Germany
TAI KAAN as a 5+ generation fighter would have to have an engine of at least 18000 lbf to remain competitive, in principle 80 kn dry and 36000 lbf 160 kn with an afterburner.
I don't know whether our engineers will be able to achieve this so easily in 6-8 years - that's a lot.
Is the TEI TF 6000 engine already installed in the Anka 3 prototype?

As far I know they use an ukrainian Engine, TF-6000 will be integrated later. I think also the serial Production Anka-3 will use the ukrainian Engine.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,249
Reactions
141 16,286
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
TAI KAAN as a 5+ generation fighter would have to have an engine of at least 18000 lbf to remain competitive, in principle 80 kn dry and 36000 lbf 160 kn with an afterburner.
I don't know whether our engineers will be able to achieve this so easily in 6-8 years - that's a lot.
Is the TEI TF 6000 engine already installed in the Anka 3 prototype?
First of all, it has to be known that the engine that is named in the media as TF35000, is being developed for KAAN as a high dry thrust engine. Since the TEI MD himself announced that TEI could develop an engine similar to F119, we automatically expect a 26000lbf dry thrust and 35000lbf wet thrust from the engine being developed.
This is commensurate with the requirement of high supercruise capability expectation from KAAN as well.
If we are aiming for a developed engine version of the F110 that is powering the KAAN at the moment, then an engine like F110GE129EFE that develops 19000lbf dry thrust and 32000lbf wet thrust is already well within the TEI capability as they are already producing many a part of this engine and maintaining them in house too.
But if we are to expect 5th generation capability from this plane, then it has to have an engine that is constructed so that it's design is stealthy. It also has to have high enough thrust level to supercruise. To do that it needs atleast 24000lbf dry thrust. So with an engine that has 19000lbf dry thrust it will stay as a very capable 4.5 to even 5th generation plane akin to F35 which also can't sustain supercruise.
The TF35K engine being developed will have many attributes that will put it in to a stealthy engine class. So it is not logical for TEI to develop such an engine with low dry thrust.

When it comes to TF6000; it is a bit of a dilemma as TEI shared a picture of the engine they are building ; and it is TF10000. Not TF6000.
This brings to mind the possibility of using it on supersonic version of KE.
We are anxiously awaiting the first firing of this engine.
 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom