Isn't this just a rehash of what we talked about last time?
Most of the items listed in that article are already in the process of being localized, so why are we even debating whether they’re “Korean” or “Turkish”? It was actually kind of funny that the list even included details of technologies purchased and support received during development. Do they think Allah or the Hindu gods just directly imparted knowledge into the engineers’ heads in Turkey or India?
Is this a problem for exports? Well, if there were diplomatic issues with Korea, that might be the case, but we’ve never sold to any country where sales are prohibited in the U.S. Even in the case of the widely sold FA-50, there are many instances where foreign components included in the aircraft for overseas sales were replaced with domestically produced ones.
Some people may feel uncomfortable with phrases like “U.S. approval,” but keep in mind that Turkey is, after all, the country with the second-largest fleet of F-16s, right after the United States.
Not at all. KF-21 have tens of subsystems sourced from US and other countries. A Turkish user got triggered and made a massive list last year on twitter. I'm sure many of this will be nationalized in time, but many others simply won't be as that requires gutting the aircraft and making a new one.
But I don't understand what that means. Does that mean there are parts that are completely irreplaceable? Well, when you localize a product, some redesign is naturally involved, but it goes without saying that you design it to meet those specifications to ensure compatibility....