TR TF35000 Turbofan Engine

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
622
Reactions
3 30 1,267
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
You can make your Hürjet optionally manned. If the mission is more like bombing certain targets your unmanned Hürjet can do that very well but if the mission requires decision making or management of drones in a fleet then you can fly manned.

In any case you have the engine to make the plane that will fill a role. It will be wasteful not to make it as you have already gone through the effort of making the plane by having made the engine ready and having the experience of making fighters before.
You’re right in principle, but the TF-35000 engine is still too expensive—it’s not a disposable product.
It makes no sense to install it in a single-jet configuration on a platform, whether operated as a hybrid (manned/unmanned) or fully unmanned.

In my opinion, the Hürjet should never have been designed with F-404 engines.

Instead, it should have been equipped with 2x AI322F engines from Ivchenko Progress, which would be replaced by 2x TF 10000 engines.
You would have had more thrust with 2x AI 322F -> 19,000 lbf instead of 17,600 lbf as with the F-404 engine, and with two engines, you would have had redundancy as a naval platform.

One could even have tuned the TF-10000 engines to 12,000–13,000 lbf, which would have provided 24,000 or 26,000 lbf for the Hürjet—effectively creating an Aircraft that falls between a Gripen E and an F-18 Hornet (not the Super Version).
That would have been 100% sufficient for Turkey as a training and Highend LCA platform like Gripen; we wouldn’t need either new Eurofighter or new F-16s.
With a delta-canard configuration and a clean design using composite materials, titanium…. supersonic speeds would even be possible without afterburners.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,380
Reactions
15 8,323
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
You’re right in principle, but the TF-35000 engine is still too expensive—it’s not a disposable product.
It makes no sense to install it in a single-jet configuration on a platform, whether operated as a hybrid (manned/unmanned) or fully unmanned.

In my opinion, the Hürjet should never have been designed with F-404 engines.

Instead, it should have been equipped with 2x AI322F engines from Ivchenko Progress, which would be replaced by 2x TF 10000 engines.
You would have had more thrust with 2x AI 322F -> 19,000 lbf instead of 17,600 lbf as with the F-404 engine, and with two engines, you would have had redundancy as a naval platform.

One could even have tuned the TF-10000 engines to 12,000–13,000 lbf, which would have provided 24,000 or 26,000 lbf for the Hürjet—effectively creating an Aircraft that falls between a Gripen E and an F-18 Hornet (not the Super Version).
That would have been 100% sufficient for Turkey as a training and Highend LCA platform like Gripen; we wouldn’t need either new Eurofighter or new F-16s.
With a delta-canard configuration and a clean design using composite materials, titanium…. supersonic speeds would even be possible without afterburners.
Hürjet is a learning project for TAI and they wouldn't make a bigger plane for learning. Also there is a market in the world for such a plane while a twin engine trainer size plane can be a total failure because lack of demand.

The name Hürjet maybe confusing but I meant Hürjet-2 as a plane comparable to F16 for power but a stealth capable one filling a niche with an available engine. You can use this plane from ship carriers too. Imagine a plane that has a naval version and comes cheaper than Kaan and does not fully rely on piloted operation. It would be an exportable plane. I can hope such a plane be realized potentially with a foreign partner that operates a couple of carriers but does not have their own plane.
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
6,372
Reactions
16,282
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
''With the signatures of TRMOTOR, TUSAŞ, İDAK, HARPAX, ANOVA, ALP Aviation, TAAC, and PCS Test and Automation companies, our vision of full independence in the subsystem development processes of our national engine project has been solidified.''

What does this mean,what subsystems?
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,380
Reactions
15 8,323
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
  • Millî Savunma Bakanı Yaşar Güler, SAHA 2026 Fuarı’nda Bakanlığımız AR-GE Merkezi tarafından üretilen yeni teknolojileri kamuoyuna açıkladı. Davetlilerin yoğun ilgi gösterdiği tanıtım töreninde;
  • Ülkemizin ilk sıvı roket yakıtlı, hipersonik hızda seyir yapabilen ve en uzun menzile sahip YILDIRIMHAN UZUN MENZİLLİ FÜZE,
  • Bütün kritik parçaları AR-GE Merkezimiz tarafından üretilen GÜÇHAN TURBO-FAN UÇAK MOTORU,
  • Bütün türbin ve parçaları AR-GE Merkezimiz tarafından üretilen ONUR TURBO ŞAFT HELİKOPTER MOTORU,
  • Geniş bir etki ve band kapatma kapasitesine sahip GÖLGEHAN JAMMER
  • Kalibresinde dünyanın en hafif silahı olma özelliğine ve maksimum 2.100 metre atış menziline sahip PNR-53 SNIPER davetlilere gösterildi. Bakan Yaşar Güler, tanıtımı gerçekleştirilen sistemlerin ülkemize ve kahraman ordumuza hayırlı uğurlu olmasını temennisinde bulundu.

ALL CRITICAL COMPONENTS ARE PRODUCED BY MSB ARGE

 
Last edited:

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,063
Reactions
247 21,195
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
''With the signatures of TRMOTOR, TUSAŞ, İDAK, HARPAX, ANOVA, ALP Aviation, TAAC, and PCS Test and Automation companies, our vision of full independence in the subsystem development processes of our national engine project has been solidified.''

What does this mean,what subsystems?
No engine maker can make all the parts themselves. Subcontractors will produce certain parts as per the instruction they have received from TEI.

TRMotor being the IP rights holder was probably signing contract with the subsystem producers (subcontractor)
 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom