TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Test7

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,785
Reactions
19 19,937
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Turkey
View attachment 5771
Could it just be an image anomaly, or is that a SATCOM on TB2?
View attachment 5775

gifntext-gif.gif
1111.jpeg


The first to realize this was @Combat-Master (Sharp eye) :)
 

Reviewbrah

Contributor
Messages
535
Reactions
2,349
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why do we need TB3 now ? This is perfect!

MALE UAV, bigger payload, better electronics, much more room for new better subsystems, can be used as subsystem testbed for bigger drones. Much cheaper than Akıncı.

Also think about the export market, would be mistake for Baykar to not to get into MALE UAV market.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,683
Reactions
7 7,389
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
If they could fit the PG115, Aselsan CATS and Turkish made SATCOM and tested and verified it in such a relatively short time all the kudos to the Bayraktar team for their remarkable work. If so this will shoot the local input rate to 98+% on component basis I guess.
 

Hexciter

Experienced member
Messages
2,575
Reactions
4 11,451
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

The ‘Magic Bullet’ Drones Behind Azerbaijan’s Victory Over Armenia​

David Hambling / Forbes

I had forgotten highlight the most important part😭

“This may be the first war to be won by drones. It is unlikely to the last.”

145B73D2-B6F1-43B0-8E26-45DC3E90CD53.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,255
Reactions
142 16,330
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Correct me if I am wrong. But the main weapon of TB2/3 , MAM-L is a laser guided bomb and it can hit fast moving ground armour and military trucks etc. If you introduce satcom to tb2 then you are limiting yourself to stationary targets due to the fact that the target may not be where you think it is because of signal latency introduced by satcom operations.
Tb2’s Range of operation has already been increased from 150km to 300km. This can be further improved by Relay UAV’s if needed.
So why is Baykar integrating satcom capability to the tb2?
Can it be something to do with electronic jamming and intervention susceptibility of line of sight operated tb2? By controlling the tb2 via satcom this problem can be solved. This was proved to be the case in Euphrates Shield operation where satcom operated Anka-S UAV’s were unaffected by EW effects.
 
Last edited:

Binh Nguyen

Member
Messages
11
Reactions
44
Correct me if I am wrong. But the main weapon of TB2/3 , MAM-L is a laser guided bomb and it can hit fast moving ground armour and military trucks etc. If you introduce satcom to tb2 then you are limiting yourself to stationary targets due to the fact that the target may not be where you think it is because of signal latency introduced by satcom operations.
Tb2’s Range of operation has already been increased from 150km to 300km. This can be further improved by Relay UAV’s if needed.
So why is Baykar integrating satcom capability to the tb2?
Can it be something to do with electronic jamming and intervention susceptibility of line of sight operated tb2? By controlling the tb2 via satcom this problem can be solved. This was proved to be the case in Euphrates Shield operation where satcom operated Anka-S UAV’s were unaffected by EW effects.
I don't think the TB2-S will lose the capability to hit moving targets. C-Tech SOTM provide the data transfer rate of over 20MB per second so we can say operators on ground can receive data from TB2-S and send their command in real time. One more think, TB2 is equipped systems that can automatically keep track and project a moving target untill it is hit by MAM without need to get ground operators involve.
 

uzaysan

Active member
Messages
118
Reactions
360
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
rsz_screenshot_from_2020-11-11_09-23-23333.png


We are developing naval version of UAV's. Its for TCG-Anadolu I guess. But if we succeed, there is a big export market. Fighters for naval assets are limited(harriers are not option any more and f35 is too expensive for many countries and usa doesnt sell them to everyone). We can sell this naval UAV to other countries. Latin america countries are potential costumer.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,683
Reactions
7 7,389
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don't think the TB2-S will lose the capability to hit moving targets. C-Tech SOTM provide the data transfer rate of over 20MB per second so we can say operators on ground can receive data from TB2-S and send their command in real time. One more think, TB2 is equipped systems that can automatically keep track and project a moving target untill it is hit by MAM without need to get ground operators involve.
AI can estimate the whereabouts of the target in the 2 second latency time that satcoms suffer from.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom