• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,908
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
It's a must have for both Kızılelma and Anka-3, anything else would compromise their stealth. I wonder if they could get hydraulic actuators integrated before starting batch production, kinda doubt it though.
It is possible that first batch will be ED (Early delivery units) delivered with ukranian engine, no IRST or Targeting pod and electric actuator. Those electric actuators are the reason why control surfaces are divided up too.

I have told that before they are working on those in plane actuators but i didn't even know electric actuators was a thing. They are working those since development of first KE prototype has begun. Hope it catches up to the first deliveries.
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,271
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,661
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
How many countries have ever flown a flying wing plane?
Question was why is it important for Anka-3 to fly before TB-3, not flying wings or not. Why does it matter which one flies first if Anka-3 is a success? And TB-3 as well.
 

Merzifonlu

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
815
Reactions
28 2,496
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Baykar is currently conducting studies regarding the development of hydraulic actuators.
There is something I don't understand. Doesn't TAI already have hydraulic actuator technology? Why don't they pay and buy these parts from TAI? Wouldn't things be a lot faster this way?
 

Bürküt

Contributor
Defence News Editor
Messages
1,174
Reactions
61 2,182
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Pride. They do not get along with each other. There is an unspoken enmity in the middle.
This means that the country's resources and energy are not used in an optimized way.I wish this was happening only with UAVs or Air vehicles.It's same with the Sage and Roketsan
 

Agha Sher

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,909
Reactions
14 9,764
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
This means that the country's resources and energy are not used in an optimized way.I wish this was happening only with UAVs or Air vehicles.It's same with the Sage and Roketsan

Though I see the problem with them not cooperating on simple things, I do not believe it is sub-optimal in the bigger picture. let TAI and Baykar be in fierce competition with each other, pushing both to develop world-class products to conquer the world markets.
 

AWP

Contributor
Messages
795
Reactions
6 1,617
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Palestine
There is something I don't understand. Doesn't TAI already have hydraulic actuator technology? Why don't they pay and buy these parts from TAI? Wouldn't things be a lot faster this way?


I thinks it's good, to create a competition on who can make a better actuator or any part in general

But in that case who decide which part to be used , SSB or TSK ?
 

B_A

Contributor
Messages
1,134
Reactions
4 1,282
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

The Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force may finally introduce the Turkish-made unmanned aerial vehicle Bayraktar, which is praised as the "hero" of the war in Ukraine. How will the Ground Self-Defense Force operate this? In fact, Bayraktar's "rivals" will also be compared this time.


At a media briefing on the FY2022 defense budget draft held on December 22, 2022, the Ministry of Defense prefaced the announcement that the Ground Self-Defense Force's multi-purpose unmanned aerial vehicle was "just an example." However, the name of Bayraktar TB2 was mentioned.


A model of the Bayraktar TB2 on display at the Baikal Technologies booth at Indu Defense 2022 (photographed by Osamu Takeuchi).

 In November 2022, I had the opportunity to hear from Baikal Technologies staff at the defense equipment exhibition “Indu Defense 2022” held in Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia. The staff who responded carefully chose their words, but acknowledged that the Ministry of Defense and the Ground Self-Defense Force have shown great interest in the Bayraktar TB2.
 

I_Love_F16

Contributor
France Correspondent
Messages
932
Reactions
18 2,004
Nation of residence
France
Nation of origin
France
I still think that Aksungur would be more suited for a country like Japan. More suited for maritime operations and around 50h of endurance.
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,271
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,661
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I still think that Aksungur would be more suited for a country like Japan. More suited for maritime operations and around 50h of endurance.
They might be planning ahead for a potential war in the mainland against China, instead of defense of their island. They can easily put them in South Korea or any beachhead and use them.
 

Kitra

Active member
Messages
146
Reactions
5 366
Nation of residence
Sweden
Nation of origin
Turkey
This means that the country's resources and energy are not used in an optimized way.I wish this was happening only with UAVs or Air vehicles.It's same with the Sage and Roketsan
It is a strategic choice of TSK and the government to have multiple sources for everything from weapons to even nuclear power plants. If one fails/delays the development or is embargoed then the other can continue. this actually happened to our plans with nuclear power plants. 3 were planned but only one got built.

With this strategy, you have a better product while only money is "wasted". Futhermore, we are actually not even wasting money with this strategy since the actual goal is the development of human resources which can handle difficult situations.

The option of not having an fighter/drone/npp could mean disaster.

So this strategy is GOOD and should be supported.
 
Last edited:

Bogeyman 

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
9,925
Reactions
76 33,074
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

F5Q_rpSaoAAeuYD
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,225
Reactions
15 1,988
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I hope with the manned unmanned team and loyal wingman concepts, aerospace companies will improve usability of interfaces and autonomy of manned fighters to the point pilot no longer has to engage with throttle and stick and instead can focus on weapons and mission systems. I mean what stops any manned plane from being able to take off, land and cruise with very little real time input just like uavs can?
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,908
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Ahlatshah

Committed member
Messages
164
Reactions
19 728
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I have expected a better test from UK to be honest. We are going to need a similar cargo drone in future, in fact, more than an armed drone to be honest.
UK seems bad at developing drones. It is very surprising for aviation country such as UK

According to this article, 8 of 54 Watchkeepers UAVs have been down in recent years. Moreover, they couldnt sustain 6000 flight hours in a year, only 1200 or so. The reason is , if the article is to be believed, weather conditions of Britain island, but watchkeepers couldnt fly at hot air of the gulf.

 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
5,139
Reactions
104 10,047
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
For their UCAV requirement, they just bought MQ-9B off the shelf. Same with AH-64E for their Attack helicopter program.
For last 20 years, their Naval programs are more active than Aerospace ones. (Astute class SSN, Vanguard SSBN, Queen Elizabeth class AC, Type 26 Frigate.)
 
Top Bottom