TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

[Strong AI]

Unfortunately i have bad news for some members here.

Selcuk Bayraktar:

"[...] We will start ship trials of TB3 soon."

Selçuk Bayraktar'dan TB3 SİHA müjdesi!

Ekonomi - TEKNOFEST Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı Selçuk Bayraktar, test aşamalarını başarıyla geçen Bayraktar TB3'ün yakın zamanda gemi testlerine başlayacağını açıkladı.

ekonomi.haber7.com

 

[TheInsider]

TB3 will never be able to take off from the ANADOLU with these wings, let alone with it loaded. Even if ANADOLU is picking up speed against the wind. to make it easier to take off.

My skepticism is confirmed at every test start from this ramp. Also strange that TB3 has anti-ice applications on the wing, which I think is unnecessary for this class.

When leaving the ramp, the TB3's descent can still be observed.

Total BS.

 

[OPTIMUS]

Unfortunately i have bad news for some members here.

Selcuk Bayraktar:

"[...] We will start ship trials of TB3 soon."

Selçuk Bayraktar'dan TB3 SİHA müjdesi!

Ekonomi - TEKNOFEST Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı Selçuk Bayraktar, test aşamalarını başarıyla geçen Bayraktar TB3'ün yakın zamanda gemi testlerine başlayacağını açıkladı.

ekonomi.haber7.com

that's good news, although this "soon" is relative time delivery. I hope in the test with the ANADOLU they would see where they made mistakes.

 

[OPTIMUS]

Total BS.

I can already tell that you won't even spend a night on the open sea on deck.

 

[TheInsider]

I can already tell that you won't even spend a night on the open sea on deck.

Irrelevant and ad hominem. TB3 will EASILY take off from the deck of TCG Anadolu with a full combat load of 1450kg, the land variant of TB3 has an MTOW of 1600kg.

 

[somegoodusername]

If TB-3 can take-off from and land to Anadolu, navy will take it. If it can't navy won't. TB-3 is funded by Baykar's own pocket. More important thing is Anadolu is sailing naked. We don't have any helicopters on-board. I think naval helicopters are more important than flying a drone, currently.

 

[Oublious]

what does X47B have to do with TB3. You can have the test results from the counterpart of TB3

Naked:Take-off 152 m

Surveillance mode: 300 m take-off and 20 hours endurance

Armed ISR mode: Take-off 488 m with 12 anti-tank missiles
9 hours of endurance

From Land Take-Off = Full Payload Endurance 27 Hours

General Atomics Mojave

That not engineering data, you should go search a book what Selcuk Bayraktar have shared. It was 3 years ago, that was a book they are basing ther project on.

 

[BalkanTurk90]

If TB-3 can take-off from and land to Anadolu, navy will take it. If it can't navy won't. TB-3 is funded by Baykar's own pocket. More important thing is Anadolu is sailing naked. We don't have any helicopters on-board. I think naval helicopters are more important than flying a drone, currently.

9 Bell AH-1 SuperCobra of Turkish army trasfered to Navy Aslo during navy drills there were blackhawks and cougars in Anadolu

 

[somegoodusername]

9 Bell AH-1 SuperCobra of Turkish army trasfered to Navy Aslo during navy drills there were blackhawks and cougars in Anadolu

M48 of the seas

We need 2020 model, heavy naval helicopters.

 

[BaburKhan]

M48 of the seas

We need 2020 model, heavy naval helicopters.

Turkey was allready interested in this Model, but the US wanted not to deliver the Helicopter under the Condition that a turkish Mission Computer will be used.

 

[OPTIMUS]

Irrelevant and ad hominem. TB3 will EASILY take off from the deck of TCG Anadolu with a full combat load of 1450kg, the land variant of TB3 has an MTOW of 1600kg.

you painfully confuse the payload and combatload.

As I have already said, on the open sea on a flight deck all others operate what they have measured on land. Think ,....everything moves at sea but everything.... The ramp angles too.... On land you have your 12° angle but on the high seas in a second 15° or 6°.... Go on a ship and stay there for a week.

keep watch on deck over bridge for an hour, then look at the mirror. You will no longer recognize yourself without protection.

Suppose for TB3 you need 6kg of paint for painting on land. At sea, you may need 15 kg. Everything is different, everything else.

 

[Iskander]

you painfully confuse the payload and combatload.

As I have already said, on the open sea on a flight deck all others operate what they have measured on land. Think ,....everything moves at sea but everything.... The ramp angles too.... On land you have your 12° angle but on the high seas in a second 15° or 6°.... Go on a ship and stay there for a week.

keep watch on deck over bridge for an hour, then look at the mirror. You will no longer recognize yourself without protection.

Suppose for TB3 you need 6kg of paint for painting on land. At sea, you may need 15 kg. Everything is different, everything else.

If Baykar decided to test the TB3 on deck, then on the ground it has already passed all the necessary tests. There is no other way. After all, if he fails, he may fall overboard.
Naturally, TB3 will take off for the first time with a minimum amount of fuel and without weapons.
All “angles and degrees” have already been calculated and recalculated hundreds of times.
Where do you get so much pessimism?!

 

[OPTIMUS]

If Baykar decided to test the TB3 on deck, then on the ground it has already passed all the necessary tests. There is no other way. After all, if he fails, he may fall overboard.
Naturally, TB3 will take off for the first time with a minimum amount of fuel and without weapons.
All “angles and degrees” have already been calculated and recalculated hundreds of times.
Where do you get so much pessimism?!

I see that you should first know a few terms:

TOW = Take-off weight
MTOW = Maximum Take-off weight
PL = Payload
FOB = Fuel on Board
OEW = Operating Empty Weight
ZFW = Zero Fuel Weight
MZFW = Maximum Zero Fuel Weight

look easily :

OEW + PL +FOB = TOW

ZFW + FOB = TOW

MZFW - OEW = PL

ZWF must not be higher than MZFW before flight.
TOW must not be higher than MTOW before flight.

sorry very roughly so that everyone understands....


BAYKAR has measured and evaluated all its data on land. But data taken at sea will result in a new hull and wing design
and new landing gear, and other tires with different inflation dates.
If BAYKAR does not do this, then there is no operational safety.

It is also quite possible that BAYKAR does not think about landing ANADOLU. They see TB3 only as ammunition. Launch from the ship, landing on land. TB3s are then always added by logistics as building kits on the ship. Such construction kits will be always present on the ship???

TB3 would be able to start either way, with tricks for Turkish people. The thing will never be able to land on ANADOLU.

 

[uçuyorum]

I see that you should first know a few terms:

TOW = Take-off weight
MTOW = Maximum Take-off weight
PL = Payload
FOB = Fuel on Board
OEW = Operating Empty Weight
ZFW = Zero Fuel Weight
MZFW = Maximum Zero Fuel Weight

look easily :

View attachment 70578

OEW + PL +FOB = TOW

ZFW + FOB = TOW

MZFW - OEW = PL

ZWF must not be higher than MZFW before flight.
TOW must not be higher than MTOW before flight.

sorry very roughly so that everyone understands....


BAYKAR has measured and evaluated all its data on land. But data taken at sea will result in a new hull and wing design
and new landing gear, and other tires with different inflation dates.
If BAYKAR does not do this, then there is no operational safety.

It is also quite possible that BAYKAR does not think about landing ANADOLU. They see TB3 only as ammunition. Launch from the ship, landing on land. TB3s are then always added by logistics as building kits on the ship. Such construction kits will be always present on the ship???

TB3 would be able to start either way, with tricks for Turkish people. The thing will never be able to land on ANADOLU.

WW2 aircraft carriers were able to operate prop airplanes with relatively short decks like anadolu and no angled landing strip, in fact some of the older carriers, essex short version I think? Were converted to helicopter carriers after arrival of jets. I don't see why TB3 can't do it

 

[Anmdt]

WW2 aircraft carriers were able to operate prop airplanes with relatively short decks like anadolu and no angled landing strip, in fact some of the older carriers, essex short version I think? Were converted to helicopter carriers after arrival of jets. I don't see why TB3 can't do it

Before all those technical aspects i am wondering how TB3 body parts and electronics will welcome corrosive and humid sea conditions.

It was also logical for Baykar to make 2-3 GTU (or STU) and let it roam in the hangar, but they skipped it somehow. Possibly they will improve the product after delivery of the ED batch.

 

[neosinan]

I can provide you with test results from others.

If you are making such claims, Please release your own Finite element simulation of TB3 and release what kind of assumptions you made with these analysis. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. So Without these kind of solid data, We will take Everything you spew as BS. That is until you show your simulation numbers. Then We can start talking.