somegoodusername
Committed member
We were and are doing operations in Syria under American EW but I do no know to what extend.Turkish UAVs haven't faced western EW technology
Latest Thread
We were and are doing operations in Syria under American EW but I do no know to what extend.Turkish UAVs haven't faced western EW technology
Currently we don't expand tactical use of UAV. I mean, our army seems to know their limits however Turkish UAVs haven't faced western EW technology , so far Turkish UAVs have coped with primitive EW of Soviet technology. Americans aren't stupid and they must have researched it.
I think the solution of the connection problem is AI pilots. Remote controlled drones are doomed to be jammed so AI assisted fully autonomous drones could survive.
Revolution of AI pilots needs long time therefore nowadays we need variety of manned aircrafts.
We are also using EW if necessary and possible.Not correct, Syria is under American and Russian EW.
We are also using EW if necessary and possible.
Why? They even shot down one of our UAVsI doubt if Americans attacked electronically or tried to jam Turkish UAVs in Syria.
There is a mistake in the video, it says up to 3 kg but the image says 3 pounds, which would make it less than1.5 kg, right about the same as Kargu.Turkish vs Us - Unmanned aerial vehicle comparison
Wait a minute, he talking about repackaging the TS1400 and turning it into a turboprop. Since the BAYKAR CTO is talking about they currently developing a heavier, possible HALE platform, the main specs of this prop engine should be finalized and at an advanced stage. Baykar's current situation is very suitable to fund this project. In fact, we can say that this type of engine is also needed in the product range of defense aviation. By scaling Small, Medium and Heavy, a very valuable option can be provided to companies in both manned and unmanned aviation.
I don't know if allready posted, Baykar will develop a Akinci Variant with two TS-1400 Engines. This Variant will have an higher Payload Capacity. It can be used as SOJ or unmanned AEW&C Aircraft. Also as Carrier Platform for ALBM, ASBM as well air launched Gezgin it's interesting.
In what way will it be compared?If TS1400 turns into a Turboprop, how will it compare to Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6?
It depends on how they will convert it. If they turn it into an axial flow type it counts for a full conversion and it will be very comparable to a PT6. If they take shortcuts and attach a propeller to where the shaft is it can still work but it will lack in efficiency department. If Baykar will be the only customer they can go with a partial conversion as the numbers to use may not be very high to justify the additional cost. If TEI want to make a family of engines like the PT6 to sell widely then a full conversion makes more sense. We have no clue what will happen but I think a full conversion is more likely as there is a big market out there.If TS1400 turns into a Turboprop, how will it compare to Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6?