Are you telling me to stop forgetting the war, in a thread that concerns the official policy of your country, where its expansionist policy is obvious?@Akritas Mate let's live in peace. Forget about war.
This place ain't greek circlejerk forum We don't care about your cheap peaceAre you telling me to stop forgetting the war, in a thread that concerns the official policy of your country, where its expansionist policy is obvious?
To put it another way: in the last 50 years, Greece has neither invaded foreign countries, nor possessed parts of foreign countries, nor has it had condemnations from the UN, its planes do not fly over foreign islands, and, of course, has not issued maps and policies of the Mavi Vata type.
So, who thinks of war and who thinks of peace?
This place isn't a turkish circlejerk forum either.This place ain't greek circlejerk forum We don't care about your cheap peace we don't bow to our old subjects
We know how you are still mad because turks kicked you out of anatolia
US "bases" in N.Syria are posts , one small base (Al-Tanf) , all of them created after the 2017.
They supported from....Turkish Incirlik Air Base!!!!
US intervention in the Syrian civil war - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
When someone talks about cheap peace it means that he is not interested in human life, prosperity and of course social progress. I am sure that in Turkey there are people who do not share your far nationalistics views, that want prosperity and peace.This place ain't greek circlejerk forum We don't care about your cheap peace we don't bow to our old subjects
We know how you are still mad because turks kicked you out of anatolia
greece isnt in a position to invade anyone, it tried to annex trough ratlike behaviour in cyprus but that resulted in northern cyprus becoming its own independent state, since then greece continues on its path for pure irrelevance and insignificance, judging by the economy and demographics its basically impossible that greece could ever invade or annex any country.Are you telling me to stop forgetting the war, in a thread that concerns the official policy of your country, where its expansionist policy is obvious?
To put it another way: in the last 50 years, Greece has neither invaded foreign countries, nor possessed parts of foreign countries, nor has it had condemnations from the UN, its planes do not fly over foreign islands, and, of course, has not issued maps and policies of the Mavi Vata type.
So, who thinks of war and who thinks of peace?
The refugees want to go EU. They don’t want to stay in Turkey, expect fews. And they can’t go back home. And we let them go EU. No one has to be pushed to go to EU. All the refugees want to enter EU. And we will help than. It’s our human part acting. I know, it mean less money for Greece if they spend more on refugees and of course more Muslims and Friends of Turkey within EU. But that’s your problemThese.....
Syrians are not friends of turkey nor the TurksThe refugees want to go EU. They don’t want to stay in Turkey, expect fews. And they can’t go back home. And we let them go EU. No one has to be pushed to go to EU. All the refugees want to enter EU. And we will help than. It’s our human part acting. I know, it mean less money for Greece if they spend more on refugees and of course more Muslims and Friends of Turkey within EU. But that’s your problem
Whatever source you want, even Turkish .....
Any way, I have showed that the US used base in Turkey, in order to bombing Syria.
US Bases in Syria
www.globalsecurity.org
The U.S. Has Troops in Syria. So Do the Russians and Iranians. Here’s Where. (Published 2018)
American troops are spread across hundreds of miles of Syrian territory, and are fighting in areas that are uncomfortably near Syrian troops and Russian and Iranian forces.www.nytimes.com
US forces relocate its bases in Syria
Since Turkey started anti-terror operation in N. Syria, US evacuated over half of bases, relocating in oil-rich regions - Anadolu Ajansıwww.aa.com.tr
Is not make sense Turkey to possess either red areas, because there are maritime delimitation agreements between Cyprus and three States(Egypt, Israel and Lebanon), all recognized as provided from the UN(the Law of the Sea).Perhaps someone more informed can enlighten me, but at first glance it would make sense for Turkey to possess red areas, South Cyprus to possess the area highlighted in green, and for the TRNC to possess the remaining pink areas............
greece isnt in a position to invade anyone, it tried to annex trough ratlike behaviour in cyprus but that resulted in northern cyprus becoming its own independent state, since then greece continues on its path for pure irrelevance and insignificance, judging by the economy and demographics its basically impossible that greece could ever invade or annex any country.
But thats because greece choosed to be irrelevant, if greece had a higher population a different mindset which could have also given greece a more robust economy it would have acted differently.
Greece neither wants to invade nor dreams of extremist plans like Turkey with Mavi Vatan.greece isnt in a position to invade anyone, it tried to annex trough ratlike behaviour in cyprus but that resulted in northern cyprus becoming its own independent state, since then greece continues on its path for pure irrelevance and insignificance, judging by the economy and demographics its basically impossible that greece could ever invade or annex any country.
But thats because greece choosed to be irrelevant, if greece had a higher population a different mindset which could have also given greece a more robust economy it would have acted differently.
Is not make sense Turkey to possess either red areas, because there are maritime delimitation agreements between Cyprus and three States(Egypt, Israel and Lebanon), all recognized as provided from the UN(the Law of the Sea).
View attachment 37438
It is absolutely clear that from the point of view of international law, the Turkish claims around Cyprus are totally unfounded and unsupported either by customary and treaty law or by case law.
As regards the West Part, Turkey arbitrarily forgets the Greek islands and the rights they have under the Law of the Sea. The map you put is the ...... 4th of Turkey in 8 years. It generally changes the maps according to its moods as shown below.
View attachment 37439
View attachment 37440
Of course it is. The demarcation was carried out on the basis of the median line, which is a key position of Greece and also Italy. The demarcation is simplified (using only 16 points) as was the custom when the continental shelf was delimited in 1977.sorry but you should claim your theory to Italy. As you can see the island of greece doesn't work like east coast . Stop with your stories about international laws....
Against Libya you do use your island and not for italy.
View attachment 37443
Of course it is. The demarcation was carried out on the basis of the median line, which is a key position of Greece and also Italy. The demarcation is simplified (using only 16 points) as was the custom when the continental shelf was delimited in 1977.
It is especially important that all of the islands in the area, including those that are uninhabited, have been taken into account in the delimitation.
The agreement explicitly refers to Article 58 of UNCLOS which regulates this specific zone. The boundary for the EEZ followed the existing delimitation for the continental shelf agreed in 1977.
First sign the UNLOS, and then criticized.