The former engineering director of Tusaş's UAV department shared an article on Linkedin when he saw the "Oklavalı" Security Experts on TV. I saw this thanks to Delku from Defenceturk.I used translate directly btw.So translation might be a little weird.
Türkiye'de İHA: Az Bilinen Gerçekler | 106 comments on LinkedIn
www.linkedin.com
Last night (April 18, 2023) he called himself a "security policy expert" in a panel discussion on CNN.
Turkey's unmanned aerial vehicles history and especially Baykar A.Ş. with the company
I saw that you made comments that were heated, but that did not reflect the truth. due to overdose
I did not watch the whole program because I could not remove it, but I did not share the public opinion about the part I watched.I consider it my duty to inform, as someone who has given 30 years to the subject.
First of all, in yesterday's program, Baykar A.Ş. It was mentioned that the company did not receive any government aid. This the visible and invisible state supports given to the company are as follows.
1) Establishing a drone facility for this company with the presidential decree (1) issued on September 4, 2019
600 million TL (at the rate of that time, 105 million dollars were donated and tax exemptions (tax)
discount rate 100%, investment contribution rate 120%) was applied. At this time the state had
It should also be emphasized that there is an idle production capacity in tusaş.
2) an important detail that should not be overlooked in this decree is that in 2010 the ssm {now
ssb) targeted akıncı and fighter in the future, which is included in the UAV roadmap, which was largely prepared by TUSAS.Acceptance that combat UAV projects will be awarded to this firm, when normally it should be tendered
that it has been made.
3) As a matter of fact, he was appointed to TUSAS in 2016 and is known for his closeness to the government and the owner of the company in question.The continuation of the Anka project developed by tusaş, shortly after the general manager took office.Written to the board of directors not to participate in the raider project as tusaş
has taken a decision in this direction.
4) It would not be appropriate to enter the details of the UAV features in the specifications here due to confidentiality.
However, more than 10 of the 15 technical features expected from Akıncı UAV are tusaş with the Anka project.
are acquired and field-tested features. In contrast, the Akıncı project is one of these features.
Developing the TB2 UAV, which has only 3 of them, Baykar A.Ş. company, TUSAŞ senior management
with their contributions (!) without a tender. Anka infrastructure developed with state resources was ignored,
for the redevelopment of this infrastructure, Baykar A.Ş. The state may also incur losses by transferring funds to the firm has been beaten. An important detail, the scope of the Anka project is also very important in Türkiye and its surroundings via satellite.The infrastructure established in one of our bases to control a large number of UAVs is also in Akinci due to its incompatibility.became unusable and the damage inflicted was further multiplied by establishing a duplicate center.
5) “From above” in some of the tenders that TUSAS has entered abroad and have a high probability of winning.
Bids were withdrawn with the instructions received, and Baykar A.Ş. It paved the way for him to bid here with a tb2 product with less capacity than Anka. Unfortunately, some of these tenders were also lost.
6) Due to the decision of the general manager of tusaş not to enter the raider project,About 70 tusas engineer with an average of 6-7 years of experience in the Anka project, who cannot see and are demoralized engineer left the company within 2 years after the decision was taken, a significant part of them He went abroad to work. Unfortunately, it is very easy to compensate for this value of approximately 500 man-years does not appear.
7) tusaş developed on the Anka infrastructure with its own resources without any support from the state.
Although Aksungur iha slows down this brain drain to some extent,due to the negative effects of mobbing on level managers,has accelerated.
8) Regarding the negative discrimination applied to TUSAS as of 2022, "the ball of the scale is a bit too
exporting by thinking that "he escaped" and refraining from the news about this.In this regard, tusaş's way was partially opened, and foreign sales of Anka and Aksungur were started.However, it is unfortunately not possible to reverse the results of the wrong policies in the past.
9) Initially, positive discrimination was made in the domestic sales of Baykar A.Ş.'s tb2 product.Facilitation was provided for additional sales and acceptance tests point out some shortcomings about the product .Hearings that pressure was put on the personnel who brought him, and even a change of duty was made has been.
10) many flying tb2s in the field have accumulated flight hours faster than Anka, as a result It has reached operational maturity and gained success by eliminating its mistakes and deficiencies.
11) Due to this operational success in the country, Baykar A.Ş. company's tb2 product, many countries It has attracted the attention of its customers, and with the successes achieved in fields such as Libya, Azerbaijan and Ukraine, it is also ahead of its exports has been opened. At this stage, positive discrimination in foreign relations and financing shown to the company Although it certainly has some effect on exports, the product has proven itself with its successes.
12) Both Tusaş and Baykar A.Ş. and vestel inc. with companies that develop drones, such as
many subsystems, especially aselsan, rocketsan, sage and havelsan, which provide subsystems to them.
There is an ecosystem of defense industry companies. our “defense policy expert” and
a trend that will turn this ecosystem back after the election, as some other touts have said.
it's not possible. With a good planning, the future of our country in this and other matters is very bright.
and it is a necessity in terms of the region we are in. However, the positive exemplified above
discrimination should not be expected to be applied in the same way after the election. the subject of this so-called
this is exactly why it was escalated and agitated with experts and some other commentators; new
fair competition conditions will prevail in the period.