I get what you're saying, but why does it need to be a direct new tech? Being a good systems developer, a good concept developer and having the affinity to bring many different COTS parts into a meaningful product is a trait on its own, something Baykar does excel at.
As for the CONOPS of drones as SEAD and CAS platforms, I think an answer lies in who gave the idea and the tech to Azerbaijanis to turn AN-2s into decoys for SAMs. Was it the Israelis, was it Baykar? We don't know. We also don't know how much they had a part in creating the drone concept TSK employs now. We do know that both brothers were directly involved when drones were being implemented, they were almost embedded to the teams. We also know that they work in real time to make the software better from the feedback of the users. They do have a part in perfecting the whole thing which I think cannot be just awarded to the user alone.
Context is important and you are maybe the first poster whose responded to me understanding the underlying nuance of my points. Others seems to have reacted personally as if i insulted their god.
The original point was made by ryder that potentially seljuk would be a target of Mossad, which goes back to the AK party mouthpiece Mete claiming the Isrealis had been monitoring him because he even had swarm software that no one else had, for all my searching i cant find anything to suggests that a true statement either.
The general perception was made that he's some kind of tech genius and because he's a tech genius he could be targeted. My response was quite simple, that baykar doesnt really produce much tech, they assemble using other peoples tech. Nothing wrong with that, but simply pointing out seljuk and baykar don't really produce any inhouse tech other then assembling and creating something greater then the sum of its parts. Nothing wrong with that, but lets call a spade a spade. Even that munition they recently revealed uses an american engine.
Then others went on tangents like the Moroccan talking about the style of warfare, which i think is more to do with the Turkish army then seljuk himself, unless of course someone can present direct evidence that he designed that style of warfare and directly oversaw its implementation in syria then im more inclined to believe its the army rather then seljuk who should take credit for it.
Is it reasonable to believe they played a role, yes it is. Is it reasonable to believe that the Turkish armies performance was critical to the success of the operations using said drones yes.
however several posters seem to be convinced that baykar has produced lots of technologies, would those same posters list the technologies the company produced?
