Last edited:
Then China should stop claiming and taking territory like its some kind of free give away event, and stirring conflicts with many other country in the region.
Looks likely. They hint that ships could start being received by next year. I don't follow Italian shipbuilding but looks like they have 1 or two hulls ready for transfer.Lmao same time, the ongoing built up at Riva Trigoso is PPA? Maybe we will take the Italiam lot, like what they did to Egyptian FREMM
I have seen this occurring on a "reliable builder's" ship, the hatch itself was made by another northern country known to be high with the quality, QC, certification. So yeah, not really a reference for quality of the whole ship. Board slamming is the worst.Thank God for skipping 052D
So they are going to surpass China, France, UK and be on the same league with the US sharing the "Global power projection" throne. Good to hear.They're aiming for global projection
no lol, this franco salesman atleas have some insight to it.So they are going to surpass China, France, UK and be on the same league with the US sharing the "Global power projection" throne. Good to hear.
Most DSRV including NATO SRS has the similar capabilities. (Capacity of 20 + 3 crew to operate)looks like our DSRV is freshly developed and manufactured, still no detail regarding it's capability and specification, those capacity to carry 50 submarine crew member + 3 operator in one trip is definitely the selling point, most DSRV on our region such as india, vietnam, singapore etc can only carry more or less 20 crew.
they also had another solution with 3 operator + 18 submarine crew (made by FET, but supplied as whole system including the mothership by SMP).Most DSRV including NATO SRS has the similar capabilities. (Capacity of 20 + 3 crew to operate)
However, has SMP ever supplied a Navy with their SRV? I have heard of their equipment mainly in the rescue support systems but the SRV itself, have they ever delivered it? and why is it labeled as SRV but not DSRV.
FYI, most DSRVs are transportable by air, land or sea that is not a new feature. But a 50 passenger capable SRV, i am indeed curious how they are going to fit it on a low-bed truck.
well, kemhan nowadays always gib us a cluedid kemhan admin drop a CLUE who's going to win the submarine tender ??
View attachment 60950
Lmao after a330 mrtt now this u214,well, kemhan nowadays always gib us a clue
However, has SMP ever supplied a Navy with their SRV? I have heard of their equipment mainly in the rescue support systems but the SRV itself, have they ever delivered it? and why is it labeled as SRV but not DSRV.
Looks like the number of capacity of 50 passenger is they tightly packed, as seen on the videoFYI, most DSRVs are transportable by air, land or sea that is not a new feature. But a 50 passenger capable SRV, i am indeed curious how they are going to fit it on a low-bed truck.
and the seating configuration looked very similar with the other DSRV from other navy, 20+ passenger seat.
i count 26 people on the seat, 4 in the bunk bed, and the rest 20 could be "Ngemper" and sit on the SRV floor.....SRV-300 - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.orgDrass Submarine Rescue System – DRASS GROUP
www.drass.techWhile DSRV is the term most often used by the United States Navy, other nations have different designations for their vehicles.Deep-submergence rescue vehicle - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
I think it just the matter of labelling/naming the system, the capabilities are relatively comparable
Looks like the number of capacity of 50 passenger is they tightly packed, as seen on the video
and the seating configuration looked very similar with the other DSRV from other navy, 20+ passenger seat.