TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Boykaz

Active member
Messages
48
Reactions
1 127
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bayraktar TB3 took off from 110 meters, wow.
also Tcg Anadolu 232 meters
Screenshot_2023-11-21-18-49-18-496_com.twitter.android.jpg
Screenshot_2023-11-21-18-48-53-004_com.google.earth.jpg
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,189
Solutions
2
Reactions
100 23,175
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Strange, if i read correctly the personnel attempted to stole an internal harddisk. First of all the computers have their cases locked, where only IT may unlock with a physical key and install a hardware. Then, there is a strict rule on no electronics in, no electronics out (except of the phones given to the personnel, which has many functions disabled by enterprise mode). And this is rule is consistently applied and security is no chill about it.
This is either an intern, or a silly and inefficient personnel who may taught of attempting this. Last option this was a large scale espionage involving IT, Security and personnel granted an access to all files.
Fun fact, files are rarely kept in local storages in a meaningful way unless the user draws them from the server for project related uses.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,355
Reactions
28 4,163
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Screenshot_2023-11-21-20-47-30-717-edit_com.android.chrome.jpg



For TB-3 Why TEI PD-170 why not PD-180 ST which is lighter and more powerful?

Screenshot_2023-11-21-20-48-02-707-edit_com.android.chrome.jpg







Edit: why not PD -222ST which weights as same as PD-170 /180ST?

Screenshot_2023-11-21-20-46-53-051-edit_com.android.chrome.jpg


EDIT 2:

At 30k altitude, PD-170 generates more power then PD-180/222 so it must be the reason.

As you can see currently there is no alternative to Turboprops.


Now i can understand why Americans want to develop rotary technology.

50kg generates 200hp.


 
Last edited:

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,017
Solutions
1
Reactions
11 2,838
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
View attachment 63156


For TB-3 Why TEI PD-170 why not PD-180 ST which is lighter and more powerful?

View attachment 63157






Edit: why not PD -222ST which weights as same as PD-170 /180ST?

View attachment 63158

EDIT 2:

At 30k altitude, PD-170 generates more power then PD-180/222 so it must be the reason.

As you can see currently there is no alternative to Turboprops.


Now i can understand why Americans want to develop rotary technology.

50kg generates 200hp.


PD-222ST is the new engine they were developing, not sure if a prototype has been tested on the ground let alone on a new drone, or maybe not even built yet.
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
4,469
Reactions
81 16,770
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
View attachment 63156


For TB-3 Why TEI PD-170 why not PD-180 ST which is lighter and more powerful?

View attachment 63157






Edit: why not PD -222ST which weights as same as PD-170 /180ST?

View attachment 63158

EDIT 2:

At 30k altitude, PD-170 generates more power then PD-180/222 so it must be the reason.

As you can see currently there is no alternative to Turboprops.


Now i can understand why Americans want to develop rotary technology.

50kg generates 200hp.


Maybe also price is a factor here. According to people with knowledge the price of PD-170 is already very high due to the fact it is packed with a lot of functions. If PD-170's price is high maybe the prices of PD-180 or the PD-222 is even higher. I am only speculating here. TB-3 (or tuned down version of it) would eventually replace our TB-2's in time and maybe we want to keep the price as low as possible. I am only speculating so don't take me serious on that :)
 
E

Era_shield

Guest
Strange, if i read correctly the personnel attempted to stole an internal harddisk. First of all the computers have their cases locked, where only IT may unlock with a physical key and install a hardware. Then, there is a strict rule on no electronics in, no electronics out (except of the phones given to the personnel, which has many functions disabled by enterprise mode). And this is rule is consistently applied and security is no chill about it.
This is either an intern, or a silly and inefficient personnel who may taught of attempting this. Last option this was a large scale espionage involving IT, Security and personnel granted an access to all files.
Fun fact, files are rarely kept in local storages in a meaningful way unless the user draws them from the server for project related uses.
Just guessing here since no details are given but normally (excluding special equipment used by govt/banks/etc) the type of lock used on computer cases is low security, it's only really meant to prevent opportunistic theft. The keys are easy to get. It could also be talking about a laptop, which can be opened with a screwdriver. To me the description sounds like a disgruntled employee or an employee who was bribed by a competitor. A serious espionage attempt would be more sophisticated, for example using a special tiny USB key which doesn't even look like a USB key, and only needs to be plugged in and can automatically image all the drives onto itself.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,189
Solutions
2
Reactions
100 23,175
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Just guessing here since no details are given but normally (excluding special equipment used by govt/banks/etc) the type of lock used on computer cases is low security, it's only really meant to prevent opportunistic theft. The keys are easy to get. It could also be talking about a laptop, which can be opened with a screwdriver. To me the description sounds like a disgruntled employee or an employee who was bribed by a competitor. A serious espionage attempt would be more sophisticated, for example using a special tiny USB key which doesn't even look like a USB key, and only needs to be plugged in and can automatically image all the drives onto itself.
If i recall correctly, no peripherals (except permitted like keyboard etc.) work on those computers.
 
E

Era_shield

Guest
If i recall correctly, no peripherals (except permitted like keyboard etc.) work on those computers.
That's good to hear, it means Baykar is taking security seriously.

Fun fact for readers: the reason motherboards with PS/2 ports are still made is because of this. The USB ports are completely disabled for security reasons so only PS/2 mice and keyboards can be used.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
1,694
Reactions
61 7,674
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
President Erdoğan:

Now they are conducting the final tests of the Kızılelma. The challenge we have to overcome is to produce our own indigenous engine...

Aselsan has a burden here: camera production. Unfortunately, engine production takes five years. In this process, we have to import engines

Full rate production for TF6000 confirmed as 5 years?
 

Merzifonlu

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
691
Reactions
24 2,053
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
1,694
Reactions
61 7,674
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think TF-10000 for KE, not TF-6000. If KE's testing is nearing completion, I think that's great news. A period of 5 years is foreseen for the TF-10000 Engine to enter mass production. This is an achievable goal, but still an ambitious one.
I'm not so sure. We know that TF6000 will be on the KE. TF10k is not even brought up yet in regards to its milestones.
 

Quasar

Contributor
The Post Deleter
Messages
577
Reactions
34 2,585
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I'm not so sure. We know that TF6000 will be on the KE. TF10k is not even brought up yet in regards to its milestones.
especially if we consider the fact that TF10000 is TF6000 with afterburner... spending 5 years mainly for afterburner section can not be tha case I guess
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,564
Reactions
7 7,215
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
5 years is in a slow pace which is the norm. You can put it on the fast track and count months. TEI have already left some years behind in this engine development.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,053
Reactions
116 14,902
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
especially if we consider the fact that TF10000 is TF6000 with afterburner... spending 5 years mainly for afterburner section can not be tha case I guess
Please don’t forget that, although TF10K shares its core with TF6K, these engines are quite different.
When a 6000lbf thrust is augmented suddenly to 10000lbf as afterburner kicks in; that 4000lbf sudden thrust will crush the engine. Therefore the TF10K has to be built to better specs to withstand the sudden jolt.

There is however no reason to build the TF6K to the better specifications due to cost issues.

You are correct that as the TF10K is a derivative of TF6K. Hence it shouldn’t take too long to muster. But nevertheless it is a new engine and has to be tested as such.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,190
Reactions
22 18,828
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
I have a question (that I probably could google), but when you turn on the afterburner, you're talking about sudden increase in speed and thus higher pressure, but is it possible to gradually turn on the afterburner in steps to minimize the sudden thrust ?
 
Top Bottom