I already said I wouldn't consider Hürkuş C in an actual war but in counter-terrorist operation, pay attention to what is written before lashing out mate. And close air support doesn't mean what it meant in WWII or Vietnam or even what it meant 20 years ago.Good luck with your slow drones( MANPADSbait ) that would be blocked and jammed over battle in case of EW. Or you wouldn't fight against an Army that had this technology? Would your enemies be just African tribes?
Vice versa i offered relatively cheaper and ground attack aircraft rather than Hürjet.
According to you Hürkuş -C should be BS.
Trying to hunt tanks with a plane that costs, at best, several millions that's going to have to use atgms with low range makes zero sense, at least with drones small squads can launch them and hunt them on the ground and a drone that can carry let's say Karaok can spot and hit a tank from 2 or more kms away before ever being spotted. Ever tried spotting something that small from that far away? Not to mention, nobody is hunting a drone with manpads and if they did they'd actually be wasting money. On top of all this, those slow drones have already proven themselves capable even used as low tech as simply dropping grenades on tanks, multiple models in fact. What I'm suggesting is an upgrade on the concept.
And jammed and blocked?? You think we are going to use off the shelf drones or something? We already have drones that are resistant to jamming, any drone we might make from now on that might be used in an actual war will be the same.