TR Attack & Utility Helicopter Programs

Ripley

Contributor
USA Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
882
Reactions
21 2,647
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Turkey
I see it as new Hürkuş loading. TAI doesn't have the time and resources available to build it as such, they don't have a viable engine, they probably don't have the necessary back and forth with the army either. On top of that, increasing brain drain, continued lack of funding, claimed sunk cost of 500 million dollars on the development already and they are now probably stuck.

Don't let my enthusiasm showing from seeing the actual picture. A design changing this much in such a short time frame multiple times is a sign of disaster in the making. T925 majorly changed 4 times since 2018, T929 changed at least 3 times. And these are just the publicly available ones. It's not looking too good. T925 is claimed to make its first flight this year. Let's see.
Your “enthusiasm” surely don’t leave any room for dreams and wishful thinking 😔

T925 was my favorite project among many others. I was sincerely hopeful but schedule changes, delays, lack of engine all were red flags. And when I heard they were redesigning to scale it down, that’s when my heart sank.

We really, really needed that beast.
 

Ripley

Contributor
USA Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
882
Reactions
21 2,647
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Turkey
Does the army need it that much? Hasn't the entire idea of heavy attack helicopters become somewhat antiquated by how common manpads are these days?
I was referring to T925, heavy cargo heli.
And I dont believe a new and heavier attack helicopter should be top of the list, either.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,195
Reactions
48 20,824
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Will Gökbey be a stopgap solution for S70, I know their specs are completly different, but I do not think we are in a position to not keep supplying our armed forces with more Helicopters and we need to be doing it constantly.

I thought the T925 was going to be such a platform like S70 and if you look at the armed version of S70 it's pretty bad ass.
 

Pokemonte13

Active member
Messages
57
Reactions
2 82
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Will Gökbey be a stopgap solution for S70, I know their specs are completly different, but I do not think we are in a position to not keep supplying our armed forces with more Helicopters and we need to be doing it constantly.

I thought the T925 was going to be such a platform like S70 and if you look at the armed version of S70 it's pretty bad ass.
till T925 is ready in 2030 we have a dire need for medium helicopters and gökbey will go in to full serial production in 2028 with different versions but with trump in the white House the chance for a continuance is high but i think gökbey is more needed than t925
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,195
Reactions
48 20,824
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
till T925 is ready in 2030 we have a dire need for medium helicopters and gökbey will go in to full serial production in 2028 with different versions but with trump in the white House the chance for a continuance is high but i think gökbey is more needed than t925
Yes, while current Gökbey is using HTEC engine we have not heard anything with regards to the domestic engine TS1400, and that's not a good thing imo.
 

No Name

Contributor
Messages
455
Reactions
8 486
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
Here is an interesting video about the role of attack helicopters in the modern battlefield


To those wondering who he Michael Shurkin was a nonresident fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Africa Center.

Shurkin is an expert in European defence and West African politics and security. He holds a PhD from Yale University, and his experience includes serving on the National Security Council, being the senior political scientist at RAND, and serving as a political analyst at the Central Intelligence Agency.

He is currently a lecturer at Johns Hopkins University, an adjunct professor at the Maxwell School of Citizenship & Public Affairs, the director of global programs at 14 North Strategies, and the founder and president of Shurbros Global Strategies.
 
Last edited:

Fairon

Contributor
Messages
457
Reactions
6 1,152
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
1,624
Solutions
1
Reactions
25 4,617
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Isn't the reason we can't produce more T70s not because of CAATSA but because the license in the original agreement expired?

Also, they have just started negotiations?

Guess no good news coming from T925 development.
Nope, it was CAATSA, there was an announcement from L&M, as it is mentioned in the article, and it isn't about expiration.
 

Fairon

Contributor
Messages
457
Reactions
6 1,152
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Nope, it was CAATSA, there was an announcement from L&M, as it is mentioned in the article, and it isn't about expiration.

There was lots of talks about we can only build T70's till certain year and after that we have to renew the agreement.(which requires a congress approval)

With quick search I could only found below article which states the deadline as AUG24. (There was lots of more detailed information available but at the time I couldn't found it) We could only build 38 of the 109 helicopters due to national avionics and equipment development took so long.


I know L&M made an annoucement and it coincides with the AUG24 date.

CAATSA definitely made it much difficult to extend the agreement, I agree but the main reason is not that.(After all we build the T70's under CAATSA)

Well in the end we could say it is because of CAATSA, without it we probably wouldn't have trouble renewing the agreement but still..
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom