About PT DI, user and Government as funder of market activity here, there is several fatal flaw in which resulted in marginal results of PT DI market strategy along with their work style.
One, about the exact identity of PT DI, are they aircraft maker and assemble or including designer and research development? Those two are very different concept actually. And of course if they are become both of them, which one is more pronounced and become their main business activity?
Second, PT DI should not act as custom garage seller of their aircraft products, as most of their products is custom Made unit without much uniformity between each other for their system this quite apparent on their CN 235 and helicopters units. Each aircraft system need certification need test and research development, which mean more time and money
Third, simplify production line facilities with automation
One, about the exact identity of PT DI, are they aircraft maker and assemble or including designer and research development? Those two are very different concept actually. And of course if they are become both of them, which one is more pronounced and become their main business activity?
Second, PT DI should not act as custom garage seller of their aircraft products, as most of their products is custom Made unit without much uniformity between each other for their system this quite apparent on their CN 235 and helicopters units. Each aircraft system need certification need test and research development, which mean more time and money
Third, simplify production line facilities with automation