So it seems there's no need for Siper B1( HisarRF+Booster)since there is SIPER B2.Size difference between Siper Block 2 and Hisar-RF (basically Siper Block 1 when booster attached) is something.
![]()
![]()
Quiet the opposite SIPER B1 is needed very much, cheaper and effective up to ~100km, if you could fight a target with B1 why would you waste a B2? Everything has it's own use.So it seems there's no need for Siper B1( HisarRF+Booster)since there is SIPER B2.
BTW i have seen first time Siper Block 2![]()
For every target we already had cheaper, simplier Hisar RF instead of B2.Quiet the opposite SIPER B1 is needed very much, cheaper and effective up to ~100km, if you could fight a target with B1 why would you waste a B2? Everything has it's own use.
It's seeker/s are going to be larger/more advanced too. That would affect the cost of the missile.I don't think there's a big difference in terms of costs because of larger and taller rocket. B2 is not SM3 .
On the other hand what will be the maximum range of SIPER B2? Not 200km. The range must be app 150km .
Anyway.
You sure about that? Siper 2 is huge, Imho It might have greater NEZ than 150km.I don't think there's a big difference in terms of costs because of larger and taller rocket. B2 is not SM3 .
On the other hand what will be the maximum range of SIPER B2? Not 200km. The range must be app 150km .
Anyway.
You sure about that? Siper 2 is huge, Imho It might have greater NEZ than 150km.
This pics speaks volumes.
Last night I was thinking the same 20 ready to fire missiles would be imppresive for a land based varient prefrably ''trasportable'' almost a batterie worth of missiles in one single GOKSUR yet distributed architecture has more advantages in most cases but wait we can also create a distributed architecture from 20 missles variany of GÖKSUR all of sudden now you have 80 to 100 ready to fire missilesI love the way new launcher, 100-N, looks. Now I just want to see it on an armoured vehicle and then my Warhammer 40K looking armoured vehicle fetish will be satisfied.
Seriously though, I wonder if that turret could be used on an armoured vehicle (or even a light tank chassis maybe?) with all necessary sensors and stuff put on the vehicle itself, sort of like Gürz.
Size difference between Siper Block 2 and Hisar-RF (basically Siper Block 1 when booster attached) is something.
![]()
![]()
Having seen very closely Göksur-standalone launcher, i would say: No way! The launcher is huge and tall. It would be Eifel tower on the tankI love the way new launcher, 100-N, looks. Now I just want to see it on an armoured vehicle and then my Warhammer 40K looking armoured vehicle fetish will be satisfied.
Seriously though, I wonder if that turret could be used on an armoured vehicle (or even a light tank chassis maybe?) with all necessary sensors and stuff put on the vehicle itself, sort of like Gürz.
not on a vehicle but a land based '' trasportable '' variant with 20 missiles is a hard to ignore possibilityHaving seen very closely Göksur-standalone launcher, i would say: No way! The launcher is huge and tall. It would be Eifel tower on the tank
İt would be Kinda taller Fırtına howitzer.
Wouldn't be the first big launcher on a tank or IFV thoughHaving seen very closely Göksur-standalone launcher, i would say: No way! The launcher is huge and tall. It would be Eifel tower on the tank
İt would be Kinda taller Fırtına howitzer.
How could react the turret rapidly? For naval turret it Needs powerful motor , naval göksur is heavy as hell although TOS like systems rotate slowly.Wouldn't be the first big launcher on a tank or IFV though
Pegasus aa system from South Korea
![]()
TOS-1 from Russia
![]()
This anti-tank system from China
![]()
Maybe that launcher could be used as well, or not. Just a wish as I think having 20 missiles ready to fire on the move would do a lot of good.