TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

YeşilVatan

Contributor
Messages
730
Reactions
16 1,851
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
At that point F-35 will have already killed the bird in question tho.
I don't think it will play out like that in a crowded wartime Aegean airspace. It will be much more chaos than my brain can handle, missiles, AA batteries, UAVs, F-16s, Rafales, Ballistic missiles... I have no idea what will happen but that kind of 'noisy' environment can either hinder or enhance performance of the F-35s.
 

DBdev

Well-known member
Messages
303
Reactions
8 527
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
At that point F-35 will have already killed the bird in question tho.
Yes that is why Kizilelma desperately needs, DIRCM as powerful as it's systems allows and DAS for situational awareness against incoming missile and not getting lost during following 9G maneuvers while firing up chaff and flare. Again Red Flag never tests these more critical counter missile parts. They just want you to believe if you get fired upon by an F35 you just die. (n):sleep: It is never that simple.

Also Aselsan DAS + IRST+ Destructive laser pod(s) in case of more powerful engine F-16 Özgür. This lack of innovation we have is more dangerous than F35 itself.
 

RMZN

Committed member
Messages
246
Reactions
5 518
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Can someone explain why Turkey opted not to develop a domestic replacement for the F-16? The recent deal with the USA seems disadvantageous and basically ripped off. I understand Turkey's commitment to replacing imported weapons and platforms with domestic ones, and they're making great progress. But why the rush for KAAN? Are they planning to replace the entire Turkish Air Force with KAAN and the Loyal Wingman Kizilelma, with the F-16 as supplementary? Operating a fleet of fifth-gen platforms exclusively could prove costly. Are there any future plans regarding this?
The TFX project was originally intended to be the replacement for the F-16. Replacing all F-16s with KAAN doesnt seem plausible from an economic standpoint, thats why the Özgür project is a thing and hopefully we will see an armed version of Hürjet as well. The Loyal Wingman for KAAN will most likely be a more advanced iteration of the current Anka 3 version.
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,055
Reactions
12 3,793
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
The TFX project was originally intended to be the replacement for the F-16. Replacing all F-16s with KAAN doesnt seem plausible from an economic standpoint, thats why the Özgür project is a thing and hopefully we will see an armed version of Hürjet as well. The Loyal Wingman for KAAN will most likely be a more advanced iteration of the current Anka 3 version.

Why?

If we can afford 40 new F16, 40 new EF2000, why would we not be able to afford replacing all F16's?

First replacements will be for 40 F16 blk 30, than 2 batches to replace blk 40's and again several years later the blk 50's

Besides main cost of fighter jets are not the initial purchase price, but all the needed missiles, upgrades, spares and maintenance that all have to be sourced from a foreign country.

In the bigger picture a national fighter will be much less expensive, and exponentially more effective since spares, maintenance, missile load are all sourced locally
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,133
Reactions
15 1,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why?

If we can afford 40 new F16, 40 new EF2000, why would we not be able to afford replacing all F16's?

First replacements will be for 40 F16 blk 30, than 2 batches to replace blk 40's and again several years later the blk 50's

Besides main cost of fighter jets are not the initial purchase price, but all the needed missiles, upgrades, spares and maintenance that all have to be sourced from a foreign country.

In the bigger picture a national fighter will be much less expensive, and exponentially more effective since spares, maintenance, missile load are all sourced locally
KAAN is a really big and really sophisticated platform. It won't be cheap. Even the fuel consumption would be double that of F16, and that adds up to several hundred million usd a year.
 

Angry Turk !!!

Contributor
Messages
623
Reactions
5 1,467
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
KAAN is a really big and really sophisticated platform. It won't be cheap. Even the fuel consumption would be double that of F16, and that adds up to several hundred million usd a year.
Guess what, giving the Country the proper tools to defend itself against anyone doesn't come with a cheap price tag. Expensive or not, KAAN will/must be bought a lot.
 

RMZN

Committed member
Messages
246
Reactions
5 518
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why?

If we can afford 40 new F16, 40 new EF2000, why would we not be able to afford replacing all F16's?

First replacements will be for 40 F16 blk 30, than 2 batches to replace blk 40's and again several years later the blk 50's

Besides main cost of fighter jets are not the initial purchase price, but all the needed missiles, upgrades, spares and maintenance that all have to be sourced from a foreign country.

In the bigger picture a national fighter will be much less expensive, and exponentially more effective since spares, maintenance, missile load are all sourced locally
Because we not only need to produce an entirely new and untested platform but also maintain it. Even the US decided to prolong the use of their F-16s, because its simply a much more cost-efficient workhorse than the F-35. Furthermore, they are also planning on buying new F-15s.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
880
Reactions
14 1,141
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Why?

If we can afford 40 new F16, 40 new EF2000, why would we not be able to afford replacing all F16's?

First replacements will be for 40 F16 blk 30, than 2 batches to replace blk 40's and again several years later the blk 50's

Besides main cost of fighter jets are not the initial purchase price, but all the needed missiles, upgrades, spares and maintenance that all have to be sourced from a foreign country.

In the bigger picture a national fighter will be much less expensive, and exponentially more effective since spares, maintenance, missile load are all sourced locally
It's a case of availability versus certainty (plus cost), isn't it?

Kaan with an indigenous engine looks to be quite a few years away from availabiity but will bring certainty of serviceability.
F-16 should be available sooner but without certainty of ongoing serviceability (risk of US parts and spares suspension).
Eurofighter should be available sooner with greater certainty of ongoing serviceability (lower risk of parts and spares suspension).
 

BaburKhan

Contributor
Messages
528
Reactions
6 1,197
Website
strategicreviewturkey.blogspot.com
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Germany
Turkish Technic has started passenger-cargo aircraft conversions with Elbe Flugzeugwerke GmbH (EFW), one of the leading companies in the industry, as part of the passenger-cargo conversion (P2F) of Airbus A330 aircraft.

Turkish Technic, the first MRO (maintenance, repair and modification) company in the world to cooperate directly with EFW as part of the A330P2F Program, recently carried out the cutting of the upper frame shell (UFS) of the first conversion aircraft and successfully installed the new UFS. This is an important milestone for the installation of the main deck cargo door. This cargo conversion, the first in a series of A330 P2F conversion projects, is scheduled for completion in mid-2024.


I'm sure we're all thinking the same thing right now. lol
🤞


A330-1.jpg

Will the Airbus A-330 MRTT replace or Supplement the KC-135 in the Tanker Role ?
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,291
Reactions
114 19,728
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
Turkish Technic has started passenger-cargo aircraft conversions with Elbe Flugzeugwerke GmbH (EFW), one of the leading companies in the industry, as part of the passenger-cargo conversion (P2F) of Airbus A330 aircraft.

Turkish Technic, the first MRO (maintenance, repair and modification) company in the world to cooperate directly with EFW as part of the A330P2F Program, recently carried out the cutting of the upper frame shell (UFS) of the first conversion aircraft and successfully installed the new UFS. This is an important milestone for the installation of the main deck cargo door. This cargo conversion, the first in a series of A330 P2F conversion projects, is scheduled for completion in mid-2024.


I'm sure we're all thinking the same thing right now. lol
🤞


A330-1.jpg
Amen! 😇😇😇
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,726
Reactions
104 13,945
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Will the Airbus A-330 MRTT replace or Supplement the KC-135 in the Tanker Role ?
Whether or not to expand the tanker fleet is at the disposal of the air force. In my opinion, it should be expanded. But the fleet organization, ground services and economics of this fleet are issues that are beyond my knowledge. A-330 MRT and KC-135s, they are both NATO standard tanker aircraft and the MRTTs have the same boom system that we already use. But these are just speculations, it must be emphasized again and again. We are discussing in the forum environment. While we are at it, let's open up these possibilities a bit:

The Turkish air force's tanker fleet must be one of the most important issues that the US, despite the problematic process in recent years, does not cause much trouble due to the NATO security concept. Therefore, perhaps if the US KC-46 is requested, maybe progress can be made in this regard. In any case, I am in favor of gradually becoming less dependent on US logistics, not only on the combat side, but especially on the logistics and support classes.

101 Asena fleet has 7 KC-135s that have upgraded to the Block 45-1 configuration. Even though the airframes are old, actually we have a very capable tanker fleet. On the other hand, if we start the MRTT program in 2024, it will take a long time to receive fleet-sized aircraft, and there is no such concrete step, we are only speculating currently.

But I think the general opinion that almost all of us share is that the A-330 MRTT would be the most logical choice in many respects. Turkish Airlines has a very significant number of A-330s that it is removing and can remove from its passenger aircraft fleet. Moreover, as can be seen in the news above, the P2F conversions of these aircraft will be realized within THY Technic. There is a very serious cost opportunity.

MRTT conversion takes place at Airbus' Toulouse facilities. However, there is also the following situation: THY Technic becomes a competent MRO for the A-330s, and on the other hand, ASFAT has an important capability such as the FASBAT Retrofit Center for the A400Ms, which is the main cargo aircraft of the Air Force, and this can be extended to the A-330s.

If additional KC-135s are considered for the air force, it seems that military aid type procurement from the US under NATO is a thing of the past. I think that the next tanker aircraft will be brand-new or converted aircraft with a fuselage that can be considered new. So there are actually 2 options. I don't know what kind of a chance we have for the KC-46 right now. Even if there is no political problem, there is already a serious order book and the cost is really high.

No matter how I calculate according to my own logic, the A-330s that THY is removing from the fleet seem to be the most logical choice. Of course, there is FR-TR relations if you go MRTT option, which should not be ignored. TAF is not a boutique air force, it is one of the most important elements of NATO, and each acquisition is astronomical, and that actually has a leverage effect, no matter how problems happened past.
 
Last edited:

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
1,864
Solutions
1
Reactions
31 5,404
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Not for terror but for an actual war we need a lot of them.
That is why you built enough 5th gen for your possible future needs while also maintaining your 4th gen jets. I'm going to quote myself here:

Just off the top of my head, US and Israel are buying F-15s and recently started to upgrade their F-16s, France is buying Rafales, Spain ordered new Eurofighters while UK and Germany are upgrading theirs and might order T4s, China is still producing J-10s and rolled out a new upgrade.

And add to that Russia is also getting new SU-34s. Small countries that rely on others to do the dirty work can switch to 5th gen completely because their planes won't be flying on a regular basis. None of the countries that has to regularly fly their jets are giving up on their work horses, they are expanding them. 5th gens are expensive to fly and maintain, Kaan will be no different. It will not be truly used except for the worst case scenario of an all out war.
 

Ryder

Experienced member
Messages
11,285
Reactions
11 19,467
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Turkey
Now imagine the future manned Turkish Airforce.

F16V
F16 Ozgur
F35
Eurofighter Typhoon T4
KAAN

One man can dream right.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
880
Reactions
14 1,141
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Now imagine the future manned Turkish Airforce.

F16V
F16 Ozgur
F35
Eurofighter Typhoon T4
KAAN

One man can dream right.
Talking of F-35...

The White House is giving hints that Türkiye could return to the JSF F-35 Lightnig II program, from which it had been expelled due to the purchase of Russian S-400 air defense systems.

During a recent interview on CNN Türk, Victoria Nuland, number two at the US State Department, stated that if Türkiye “resolves the S-400 issue,” they could rejoin the F-35 program.
 

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
498
Reactions
3 23 976
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey

Talking of F-35...
If we were to return to the program, I would buy as few F-35s as possible - 20-30 maximum.
We can then fly them in joint NATO operations with the F-16Vs, so we don't need to send our own Turkish jets (KAAN, F-16 Özgur & Co) to fear prying eyes and spying on foreign soil.

It makes no sense to invest money in a system that costs more to maintain and repair than the aircraft itself.
The Americans don't sell an airplane but a complete ecosystem, even in logistical matters with the F-35 you are 100% tied to them.
Yesterday I got a news on CNN Türk which is already a no go for me, the F-35 has day codes to unlock a flight from the USA.
Not Jokes without these codes, which come from the USA, the plane stays on the ground.
So if Turkey, for whatever reason, does something that the USA does not want or like, these fighter planes will not become active without daily codes.
Therefore, these aircraft only make sense in NATO operations, e.g. against Russia, Iran and various Arab states.
If they were used against Greece or Israel, you wouldn't get any unlock codes the next day at the latest.
 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom