TR Defence Exports & Updates

Umigami

Experienced member
Moderator
Indonesia Moderator
Messages
6,944
Reactions
10 5,807
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Just curious, technically is it possible to equip NEB-84 bunker buster with AASM Hammer kit and launch it from Rafale?

1000448180.png

1000448181.jpg
 

Tornadoss

Contributor
Messages
1,470
Reactions
5 2,859
Nation of residence
Czechia
Nation of origin
Turkey
In theory, why not? NEB is based on MK-84 so it could be used. although winged guidance kit would be more cost efficient I think.

kgk_dekupe.png
There was a post here, apparently winged kit not suitable for bunker buster as they need to hit fast and gliding decrease the speed.
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
1,778
Solutions
1
Reactions
27 4,989
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
There was a post here, apparently winged kit not suitable for bunker buster as they need to hit fast and gliding decrease the speed.
I stand corrected then, an active propulsion system would work better.

How about making it detach after a certain point then? Launch it with the wings, at a distance that it can drop by itself to the target, wings detach and let gravity do its thing? Targeting solutions like GPS maybe could be used to program the kit.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,639
Reactions
203 18,563
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
stand corrected then, an active propulsion system would work better.
Yes and no!
You were correct in suggesting kgk84 for NEB84 application as Aselsan also does the same in their brochure.
One has to remember that if the bunker to be penetrated is a few feet below surface the MK84 based bunker-buster bomb can do it’s job as it is designed to hit bunker surface, detonate, make a hole, penetrate concrete and detonate secondary explosives to cause maximum damage inside bunker.


But if it is a penetration like our Gazap is designed to do that is being sought after, then it needs to be released higher than 30000ft where air is rarified, gain speed to around 1.3 Mach and penetrate 90metres of earth or 7metres of C50 concrete with 25mm steel reinforcement. (This is what @Tornadoss is remembering)
So, as you rightly pointed out to give it extra range you need active propulsion to keep it at high altitude before a dive.
 

Tornadoss

Contributor
Messages
1,470
Reactions
5 2,859
Nation of residence
Czechia
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes and no!
You were correct in suggesting kgk84 for NEB84 application as Aselsan also does the same in their brochure.
One has to remember that if the bunker to be penetrated is a few feet below surface the MK84 based bunker-buster bomb can do it’s job as it is designed to hit bunker surface, detonate, make a hole, penetrate concrete and detonate secondary explosives to cause maximum damage inside bunker.


But if it is a penetration like our Gazap is designed to do that is being sought after, then it needs to be released higher than 30000ft where air is rarified, gain speed to around 1.3 Mach and penetrate 90metres of earth or 7metres of C50 concrete with 25mm steel reinforcement. (This is what @Tornadoss is remembering)
So, as you rightly pointed out to give it extra range you need active propulsion to keep it at high altitude before a dive.
yeah the discussion was about Gazap, my mistake
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom