YeşilVatan
Contributor
Financial and material limitations exist. Please stop trying to ignore them.What is holding you from adding hours to a plane's life, it is your plane that you have made.
Financial and material limitations exist. Please stop trying to ignore them.What is holding you from adding hours to a plane's life, it is your plane that you have made.
You can afford that much, it is scientific development after all and can pay off greatly. It is the best investment you can invest your money in and remember how we have already progressed in that field within a short few years. You can of course add more life to a plane by simply doing parts replacement as well.Financial and material limitations exist. Please stop trying to ignore them.
Serial production is not scientific development, it's serial production. Kaan's flyaway cost will not be below 70-80 million dollars. It's lifecycle cost will at least be double if not triple that. Simple example, Canada will pay 19 billion(CAD) for acquisition of 88 F-35s, and another 53 billion for operations and sustainment over the type's lifecycle per the Canadian Parliament.You can afford that much, it is scientific development after all and can pay off greatly. It is the best investment you can invest your money in and remember how we have already progressed in that field within a short few years. You can of course add more life to a plane by simply doing parts replacement as well.
You can use a non coated version of Kaan, can't you.Stealth increases the cost very significantly, both initially and for maintenance. Trainers are optimized for their original purpose.
Of course not but serial improvement of everything about it is.Serial production is not scientific development, it's serial production.
I hope not, I wouldn't want TEI to spare a single engineer to work on anything else other than TF6/10K and TF35K. That is more than enough and projects they will power are far more important than Hürjet.TEI was hinting on a surprise for IDEF 2025 but that can be TF10000. Hopefully they also work on a TF20000 (just my personal hope, no anything substantial)
That surprise is probably the mockup of TF-35k engineTEI was hinting on a surprise for IDEF 2025 but that can be TF10000. Hopefully they also work on a TF20000 (just my personal hope, no anything substantial)
Yes, sounds likely.That surprise is probably the mockup of TF-35k engine
If an alternative to a US engine is desired for Hurjet, there are 2 potential substitutes in the pipelineI hope not, I wouldn't want TEI to spare a single engineer to work on anything else other than TF6/10K and TF35K. That is more than enough and projects they will power are far more important than Hürjet.
I don't think an alternative engine would be needed until (or unless) someone decided to order the light attack configuration.If an alternative to a US engine is desired for Hurjet, there are 2 potential substitutes in the pipeline
- the Indian Kaveri engine (probably producing around 75kN thrust), available possibly 2030 onwards
- the proposed ROK engine (aimed at producing similar thrust to the 98kN GE F414) available possibly around 2035
IMO Indian development is slow, haphazard and underfinanced. My info from Indian online sources is that India may opt to produce a 3000 hrs life engine because a higher quality engine would arrive too late for use in the Tejas Mk1A. Ongoing development could, however, result in a viable engine at some point in the 2030's.
Basic training, as in teaching people how to fly the first time, not advanced training like Hürjet could provide. They have very different roles mate.So if turboprop airframes are good enough for training, wouldn't it be great if we had lots of Hürkus in our inventory. I'd of course prefer with domestic engine... How many did TSK order ?
Yes, but Hürkuş is expected to fill some roles that were in the past reserved for T-38. It is a high performance prop trainer. To clarify, "basic training" is not teaching cades to fly for the first time. That's done on gliders and piston engined trainers like Da-20, T-41, SF.260 and more recently the Super Mushshak. These are basic trainers. While aircraft like the KT-1 and Hürkuş are "advanced basic trainers", these aircraft mimic some performance of the jet aircraft and more importantly the avionics the cades will use in the future. There's a bit of overlap by design to make conversion easier.Basic training, as in teaching people how to fly the first time, not advanced training like Hürjet could provide. They have very different roles mate.
I really hope this deal goes through, it'll be great for TAI and Hürjet, and for us if the talk about A400M's are true. Win-win all around.Spain's ambassador to Turkey visited TAI today and sat on the Hürjet prototype.
That SASF livery Hürjet model looks beautiful even if the nationalist cross is a bit large compared to other Spanish aircraft.
View attachment 71260
That SASF livery Hürjet model looks beautiful even if the nationalist cross is a bit large compared to other Spanish aircraft.
Also, I just realised I've gotten used to seeing Hürjet in red and white, it looked weird for a second there