A post-invasion plan
Which raises the question as to whether Israel's stated war aim - destroying Hamas - is really achievable. Even senior Israeli officials recognise that destroying an ideology with bombs and bullets is impossible.
Some of the group's leadership isn't even in Gaza. Mr Katz says that if elements of Hamas can survive this war, then they could still claim "because we're still here, we've actually won".
For that reason, Mr Crump believes Israel's war aims could shift from destroying Hamas to punishing it, to make sure it there is no repeat of the 7 October attacks.
Israel is also under increasing pressure to explain what happens next, especially from the US.
One Israeli defence source said Winston Churchill wasn't thinking about a Marshall plan to rebuild Germany, when he helped launched the allies invasion on D-Day in the Second World War.
But wars are rarely won without a plan post-invasion - something that's been completely absent in Israel's military operation so far.
Weeks into the war, how much closer is Israel to its goal?
Israel wants to destroy Hamas, but there are questions over whether that is achievable.www.bbc.com
Hamas
Cannot be completely wiped out IMO.
Post invasion
1. Leave and allow civilians + unknown Hamas members to return?
2. Annexe northern part of the strip to create a safe zone?
3. Annexe the whole strip, pushing Gazans into Egypt?
Sadly (because it fixes nothing) US will support Israel taking any option.