We don't need a navy in Blacksea anymore.
We don't need a navy in Blacksea anymore.
The German Empire, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman State lost WO I because they had no navy.
We must build a large Navy, so big that it should be partioned in 3 parts;
- The Turkish Black Sea Fleet
- The Turkish Aegean Fleet
- The Turkish Mediterranean Fleet
germany didnt have the strength in numbers like the british. navy game is a numbers game. the more ships you have, the more naval territory you hold.Thats true but Germany had the strongest navy but their Navy still could not compete with the British.
In ww1 they suffered a high attrition rate hence why it was easy for the British to blockade them.
Ottomans and Austro-Hungarians had a navy but their navies were largely local. Ottomans barely had a existing navy hence why Gallipoli happened to remedy the fact we had a crappy navy and that Istanbul was under threat we relied on torpedo boats, sea mines and long range artillery to fight off dreadnoughts coming in.
We should create a strong navy to protect homeland , if a superpower like China and US park 5 Supercarrierns and desteoyers 1000 km away from Turkiye to lunch cruise missiles and fighter aircraft to bomb , Turkiye must be able with its navy to destroy those vessels .All 3 seas surrounding Türkiye are in the range of ground based ATMACAs. Doctrines of WW2 outdated.
What about air force that could hit those who launch cruise missiles?We should create a strong navy to protect homeland , if a superpower like China and US park 5 Supercarrierns and desteoyers 1000 km away from Turkiye to lunch cruise missiles and fighter aircraft to bomb , Turkiye must be able with its navy to destroy those vessels .
having a strong army gives you to escort the shipments to and from your motherland to your trade partners and also pulling up to those who misbehave towards you and tear them a new one. in short, stabilizes the market access and flow of goods to your motherland. its benefits outweigh the expenditure.What about air force that could hit those who launch cruise missiles?
What air defense umbrella that could intercept cruise missiles?
Arm racing with superpowers' Navies sounds unreasonable expensive .
Does Turkish Republic have a such problem? Vice versa we have free access to markets but we are lack of goods to export.stabilizes the market access and flow of goods to your motherland.
Blacksea countries literally have no navy and whatever junk Russia has poses no threat against us. Some patrol ships, a frigate or two, and several UAVs and USVs will be enough.Yes we do. Black sea needs to be turned into a Turkish lake.
there are A LITERAL FUCKTON of trucks in any border opening that is open across all of this country every time you look at it. Despite not having any significant hydrocarbon reserves to call our own, our economy is bigger than Saudi fucking Arabia.Does Turkish Republic have a such problem? Vice versa we have free access to markets but we are lack of goods to export.
We should invest in carrier killer technologies. We should arm ourselves to counter multiple US navy carrier/task groups
Fully Agree! i suggest nuclear tipped torpedoes to be fired directly under the CSG.We need carrier killers and hypersonic glide vehicles to counter this threat.
They have two weaknesses.The US has one weakness and strength it is far away from the rest of the world. Once their power projection capability is gone the US will struggle a lot. The US power projection capability revolves around task groups/carrier groups.
Yes, but it won't be as big as those. TF-2000 class destroyers will have a displacement of 8000-8500 tDoes Turkey plan to build large destroyers ?
I mean sejong the great class or type 55 class ?