Pretty awesome system developed for SAT/SAS.
Wellcome onboard Gökdeniz!View attachment 16889
Spot 1 difference.
And who tells gökdeniz can not engage high elavations?I love single barrel gökdeniz because its elevation 90 degrees,very effective agaist. ammunution released from air
single barrel korkuts elavation is 90 degrees,I think its someehat more than double barrel version so this is important for coming 90 degree ammos from uavs or other sources,I remember that syrian russian tanks can not elevated theirr barrel enough to fire on tanks of israels on golan heightsAnd who tells gökdeniz can not engage high elavations?
Since it shares a lot of parts with korkut:
Here korkut engaging at high elavations:
Just because you didn't see,it doesn't mean it can not.
Why will they replace S-Band radar with S-Band radar?We can see the Cenk-S instead of Smart-S in the Barbaros Class modernization program
View attachment 17121 View attachment 17122
And what is maximum elavation of Korkut or Gökdeniz, it is either 80 or 85 degrees.single barrel korkuts elavation is 90 degrees,I think its someehat more than double barrel version so this is important for coming 90 degree ammos from uavs or other sources,I remember that syrian russian tanks can not elevated theirr barrel enough to fire on tanks of israels on golan heights
Barbaros already has Smart-S if i am not wrong, and CENK-S looks more square like NS100. The same radars would be used unless they plan to transfer those to some other platforms.We can see the Cenk-S instead of Smart-S in the Barbaros Class modernization program
View attachment 17121 View attachment 17122
Thales radar will need some software upgrades in order to connect with indigenous SAMs.so that,And what is maximum elavation of Korkut or Gökdeniz, it is either 80 or 85 degrees.
Barbaros already has Smart-S if i am not wrong, and CENK-S looks more square like NS100. The same radars would be used unless they plan to transfer those to some other platforms.
If the engine is powerful enough it can probably take of without catapult assist otherwise a Hürjet size electromagnetic catapult need to be installed. One that sits above deck without alteration below deck can possibly be developed, making us all happy.Studies being carried out as to whether Hurjet could be adapted to be carrier launched-landed
if you didn't know it, know it - Hurjet is my favourite jet, step aside TFX
If the engine is powerful enough it can probably take of without catapult assist otherwise a Hürjet size electromagnetic catapult need to be installed. One that sits above deck without alteration below deck can possibly be developed, making us all happy.
They were talking about STOVL which makes the most sense, now i wonder how they will handle vertical take off.Studies being carried out as to whether Hurjet could be adapted to be carrier launched-landed
if you didn't know it, know it - Hurjet is my favourite jet, step aside TFX
Aselsan does most of the radar i think including parts of the software,they can easily "modify" it for that.Thales radar will need some software upgrades in order to connect with indigenous SAMs.so that,
İs it possible if indigenous S-Band radar could be connected easily with indigenous SAMs such as Gökdeniz and SIPER? there might be indigenous package of complete SAM systems.
Thrust to weigh ratio must be critical, an underpowered plane may not be able to take off on its installed engine power alone. We had a precedence for a while now but it is no guarantie that some other plane will have the same performance. There must be a threshold or something otherwise our engineers would have looked at it like it is a given.There's no question to whether it can or can not, we already have an example of such a jet that can.
I had discussed this in earlier posts and in other forums with a lot of resistance from others.There's no question to whether it can or can not, we already have an example of such a jet that can.