TR Propulsion Systems

[Merzifonlu]

If we remind ourselves about his statement that the relation between engine diameter and thrust level being directly related, it is hard to think that this engine is going to develop only 6000lbf thrust.
The tf10k engine diameter is almost same as the GE-F404 engine diameter that can develop 11000lbf dry thrust.
We know that the GE-F404 engine‘s diameter is 89cm and it’s fan inlet diameter is 79cm. But we don’t know the fan inlet diameter of our TF6K. But looking at the over all engine diameters of the two, it is logical to presume they too are similar. The only differences between the two are in their lengths, whereby the f404 is 391cm in length, when our tf10k is 315cm. Yet F404GE-100D which is the non AB version, has a length of 226cm which is almost identical to tf6k’s.

I mentioned these facts before. Remember?

 

[Yasar_TR]

I mentioned these facts before. Remember?

I remembered some of these facts having been mentioned in a forum by you. I did a quick search here but could not find it. Can you let me know which post it was?
If memory serves, you were mentioning about possibility of Tf6k giving more thrust than it was stated on paper.

Without comparing the f404’s and the tf6k’s inlet fan diameters, it is difficult to discuss much about the maximum potential thrust availability of our engine. But logically tf6k engine should be developing more thrust than what TEI says it will. Either they are being over cautious or their design is such that it has a lot of room for growth.

 

[TheInsider]

What is the fan diameter of TF-6000? I'm not talking about 3 dimensions which include auxiliary systems like oil tanks, gears, etc.

As far as i know TF-6000 has a fan diameter of 624mm. For comparison, F-404 has a fan diameter of 890mm.

 

[Yasar_TR]

What is the fan diameter of TF-6000? I'm not talking about 3 dimensions which include auxiliary systems like oil tanks, gears, etc.

As far as i know TF-6000 has a fan diameter of 624mm. For comparison, F-404 has a fan diameter of 890mm.

Can you give a source for that please ?
If that is the case then it makes all the difference.
Accodng to TEI’s site the width is 86cm and the height (which includes all the other paraphernalia) is 110cm. So one would think the diameter is close to 86cm.

But if it is 62.4cm as you say , then the difference in thrust is self explanatory.
Besides, f404 has a three stage LP fan section that does deliver a great deal of air in to the HP compressor section against our TF6K’s 2 stage LP fan section.

 

[Quasar]

Can you give a source for that please ?
If that is the case then it makes all the difference.
Accodng to TEI’s site the width is 86cm and the height (which includes all the other paraphernalia) is 110cm. So one would think the diameter is close to 86cm.

View attachment 69476
But if it is 62.4cm as you say , then the difference in thrust is self explanatory.
Besides, f404 has a three stage LP fan section that does deliver a great deal of air in to the HP compressor section against our TF6K’s 2 stage LP fan section.

again eventhough it is not clear another possible reference point is stated 15 cm and F110-GE-129

''SAHA EXPO Daily, President & CEO of TEI Prof. Mahmut AKŞİT also pointed out that if the radii of the relevant parts in the engine are expanded by 15 cm, the TEI-TF6000 can be converted into a turbofan engine similar to the F110-GE-129''

radii of the ''relevant parts''???

for instance if we take the Blower outer diameter For F110-GE-129 it is 970 mm

For TF 6000 can be somewhere around 670 mm

 

[Quasar]

We know that the GE-F404 engine‘s diameter is 89cm and it’s fan inlet diameter is 79cm. But we don’t know the fan inlet diameter of our TF6K. But looking at the over all engine diameters of the two, it is logical to presume they too are similar.

again eventhough it is not clear another possible reference point is stated 15 cm and F110-GE-129

''SAHA EXPO Daily, President & CEO of TEI Prof. Mahmut AKŞİT also pointed out that if the radii of the relevant parts in the engine are expanded by 15 cm, the TEI-TF6000 can be converted into a turbofan engine similar to the F110-GE-129''

radii of the ''relevant parts''???

for instance if we take the Blower outer diameter For F110-GE-129 it is 970 mm
View attachment 69477
For TF 6000 can be somewhere around 670 mm

F 404 max diameter is 89 cm inlet diameter is 71 cm



if max diameter for TF 6000-10000 is 86 - 87 cm inlet diameter can be around 68 - 69 cm seems like a logical conlusion???

-potentially available structure for 17.000 Ib & + that may still needs major adjustments which we need to master with KAAN engine eventually anyway ?

-current more efficent form for ANKA 3 - KIZILELMA?

 

[uçuyorum]

TF6000 is fatter, it has significantly higher bypass ratio than F404. So F404 has probably a much larger core and it I think uses twice as much fuel as TF6000

 

[TheInsider]

Can you give a source for that please ?
If that is the case then it makes all the difference.
Accodng to TEI’s site the width is 86cm and the height (which includes all the other paraphernalia) is 110cm. So one would think the diameter is close to 86cm.

View attachment 69476
But if it is 62.4cm as you say , then the difference in thrust is self explanatory.
Besides, f404 has a three stage LP fan section that does deliver a great deal of air in to the HP compressor section against our TF6K’s 2 stage LP fan section.

I have no concrete written source. This is what people told me when i spoke to people in the past. The number might not be exactly 624mm (it is what i remember) but i doubt it is anything higher than say 670-680mm because when i saw the engine mockup up close it was smaller than F-404(I have seen both engines up close). If we compare TF-6000 and F-404s fan section indeed TF-6000 is a 2 stage fan but it has better production technology so i won't be surprised if it performs as good as a 3 stage fan or even outperforms it.

 

[Yasar_TR]

I have no concrete written source. This is what people told me when i spoke to people in the past. The number might not be exactly 624mm (it is what i remember) but i doubt it is anything higher than say 670-680mm because when i saw the engine mockup up close it was smaller than F-404(I have seen both engines up close). If we compare TF-6000 and F-404s fan section indeed TF-6000 is a 2 stage fan but it has better production technology so i won't be surprised if it performs as good as a 3 stage fan or even outperforms it.

Well ,
taking below picture as basis

This picture on my screen measures with my engineers’ compass, 104mm long with 28.7mm fan width.
if the length of the engine is as stated in TEI site, 2250mm , then pro-rata the fan diameter is 620mm. That overlaps well with your 624mm measurement.

Re: your comment on our 2 stage LP compressor performing better,
it has to be noted that the newer f404 engines now use blisk compressor stages with CMC materials in hot sections in their EDE and EPE (Enhanced Durability and Enhanced Performance Engines) versions with most probably 4th generation single Crystal blades and friction welded LP turbines as per the newer f110s.


EDIT

I carried out a similar exercise with a F404 picture and came out to the conclusion that the fan diameter was 70cm.
The 89cm diameter figure is the overall diameter of the engine with all the paraphernalia attached to it. Infact in specifications that I found later, the inlet fan size of f404 is given as having 71cm diameter.

 

[Quasar]

624mm diameter fan is for AI-322F


I highly doupt that any mock up is ideal

Facts

1- F 404 max diameter is 89 cm inlet diameter is 71 cm

2- TF 6000 - 10000 860 mm - 870 mm respectivly, inlet diameter is ....

3- the diffrence between F 404 and F 110 is 31 cm

4- Mahmut AKŞİT ''the radii of the relevant parts in the engine are expanded by 15 cm our engine can be converted into a turbofan engine similar to the F110-GE-129'' ... simply means 30 cm expansion in diameter

Conclusion

F 404 and TF 6000 - 10000 are totally diffrent products with diffrent requirments and philosophies

F 404 is the the definition of reliability and affordable ... designed to almost always provide enough air flow to engine to prevent engine stall even in high angle of attack and quick response time of the engine that was why it was the choice of the US navy and it was and still is an almost perfect choice for trainers and light aircrafts

TF 6000 -10000 we plan to use them in our unmaned platforms for instance we want KIZILELMA to fly for 5 hours for ANKA 3 it is even more

Yet dimensional resemblence is undeniable