Latest Thread
It doesnt matter does it?Kaan has not flown with indigenous flight controller etc.
Same story as Hurjet. They promote it as fully indigenous until the promotion period ends and then they tell "well actually not all components".
View attachment 66204
Can you summarize it briefly? What did they say about the first flight?
I will be looking at those massive elevators at take off. They will(or already have) tweak the gains of the control algorithm so that it won't go in a loop of overshooting the reference point and overcorrecting.should be next week, dont count on me tho
Comments section is gold lol
Can you summarize it briefly? What did they say about the first flight?
Based on what I've seen, it needs no tweaking.I will be looking at those massive elevators at take off. They will(or already have) tweak the gains of the control algorithm so that it won't go in a loop of overshooting the reference point and overcorrecting.
It's not normal to have your elevators oscillating with so large displacements. It's clearly overshooting and that is perfectly normal for the first flight. You cannot know every parameter of your aircraft's model to feed the control algorithm before the first flight. You have to make some assumptions. Now that you have the data, you no longer have to assume. You just change the weights.Based on what I've seen, it needs no tweaking.
Even in its 1st iteration, KAAN is such an agile aircraft that, even the slightest pull up on the stick was enough to lift the nose up with haste.
Barbaros komutanım had to exert extra effort to make a smooth takeoff and not to straight up launch into space next to the ISS.
It's not normal to have your elevators oscillating with so large displacements. It's clearly overshooting and that is perfectly normal for the first flight. You cannot know every parameter of your aircraft's model to feed the control algorithm before the first flight. You have to make some assumptions. Now that you have the data, you no longer have to assume. You just change the weights.
What is blud talking about? "Codes"? What codes? The reason RN had difficulties with Exocet in the beginning of the war was down to the problem with Type 42's combat systems and EMI problems, not some "Exocet code" bull crap.Than Brits begged France to give 'codes' to engage Exocet missile. After Brit convinced France to gave the codes, they could engage the missiles.
There's quite a huge number of members who are very inclined to believing these wild theories of conspiracies, you'll not find much success in correcring them.Except Israeli version, all uses the same hardware for EW suite. that is BAE system's AN/ASQ-239 baracuda. (I am not denying the significant difference in software though)
GCAP partenrs aren't having much problems negotiating, at least as of yet, and compared to any other recent high profile international programs, it's running remarkably smoothly. UK is already engaged in designing and manufacturing of Tempest TD aircraft, and is willing to cooperate with partner nations in this regard."6G GCAP" bold claims. The last time I checked there were problems between GCAP partners, many supposed 6G features were trimmed down to realistic levels (aerodynamic design is similar to KAAN) and the cost per unit is estimated at 300+ million. There is no willingness from the UK to make KSA a part of the project. We will see the big picture better once the project amounts to something until then it is all on paper.
One thing's clear, and that's unless some other party was a deep part of the design work from the start, the flight control model would've and must've been developed by TAI in-house. As for Hurjet that seems to have been outsourced to an Italian partner, but that's not a big deal either, so as long as indigenous program is running in parallel.My theory, BİLGEM piggybacked FCS off other computers like the Central Management Computer, since they share a common architecture. The other computers don't do a lot right now, so it makes sense. Therefore, I believe the systems are in-house, but a full independent computer isn't installed for flight controls. Hence BİLGEM isn't confident announcing it's "used on the first flight", but TÜBİTAK management probably doesn't mind not making this distinction.
Kaan will fly again in the upcoming days according to Tolga Özbek
The lenght of KAAN will be shortened he didn't shared more than that, but such changes are normal this is a prototype.The length of the MMU will be shortened, the TF2000 will be the largest in its class, the F-16 deal will be announced in June."
Can anyone corroborate and comment exactly what is going on? Thank you
I didn't expect that change. Perhaps, between 19 meters or 20Tolga Özbek says the next prototype of Kaan will be slightly shorter and smaller and the nose of the next prototype will see some changes. The current prototype will fly again soon.