I'm quite hesitant to make these comments right after the positive words, but I should say what I should.
Than Brits begged France to give 'codes' to engage Exocet missile. After Brit convinced France to gave the codes, they could engage the missiles.
What is blud talking about? "Codes"? What codes? The reason RN had difficulties with Exocet in the beginning of the war was down to the problem with Type 42's combat systems and EMI problems, not some "Exocet code" bull crap.
Seriously, I sometikes wonder if this forum needs a sanity check.
Except Israeli version, all uses the same hardware for EW suite. that is BAE system's AN/ASQ-239 baracuda. (I am not denying the significant difference in software though)
There's quite a huge number of members who are very inclined to believing these wild theories of conspiracies, you'll not find much success in correcring them.
Also, that "significant difference" in SW is mostly down to which OFPs are onboard the ICP, which is also not something fundamental as an aircraft of different specification.
"6G GCAP" bold claims. The last time I checked there were problems between GCAP partners, many supposed 6G features were trimmed down to realistic levels (aerodynamic design is similar to KAAN) and the cost per unit is estimated at 300+ million. There is no willingness from the UK to make KSA a part of the project. We will see the big picture better once the project amounts to something until then it is all on paper.
GCAP partenrs aren't having much problems negotiating, at least as of yet, and compared to any other recent high profile international programs, it's running remarkably smoothly. UK is already engaged in designing and manufacturing of Tempest TD aircraft, and is willing to cooperate with partner nations in this regard.
There are ongoing joint programs between Japan and UK, and Leonardo exists as a Anglo-Italian effort, which effectively bridges the tri-nation and their technological exchange. They are all very engaged to the program.
Further, mind clarifying what the alleged "trim down" is? How could they trim down developmental goals when project definition itself isn't even complete? Also, current GCAP concept clearly has a more advanced aerodynamic design compared to Kaan or F-22 with Lambda wings coupled with Pelikan wings.
There are also no concrete cost estimates since like I've said it's not even dome with preliminary phase of development. If anything, the ongoing R&D programs indicates that the GCAP is aiming to become a very ambitious aircraft interms of its features and capabilities.
Lastly, the UK and Italy are both very willing to accept KSA as a partner. It's Japan who's strongly opposed to such inclusion.