Scholz said they let for it and the inspection for sale is ongoing in Turkiye. (Anadolu Agency)
About the EF discussion:
"We don't need EF's now but we're making purchases for our future needs" This was what the MoD did say about EF purchase.
So what could be these future needs from my sight:
TAF is trying to keep high-low balance as complementers.
We're using F-16's as the low complementer -and we will for more years- and F-4's were the high arm of the air forces but today, F-4's are barely capable of filling the high side for TurAF. We need a new high complementer. We do need but it has the urge to have them before 2030, not now. That is why we're trying to make a deal now because we will get them around 2030 if we purchase it now.
Why it is not urgent until 2030 ? Because retirements of our F-4's was delayed to 2030 after the US kicked us from the JSF program.
Then the second why forms as a question: Why do we need another high complementer other than Kaan after 2030 ?
This question may have variety of answers.
1) Production rate for Kaan will not let us have enough fleets at least until 2035. It gets even worse if you consider the situation of 2 of Kaan's future customers: Azerbaijan and Pakistan. They're much closer to possible conflicts than we do. Armenia is arming heavily and Pakistan has live conflict zones in both Afghanistan and India borders. Tensions with Afganistan won't keep for long years (imo) but Kashmir is always hot. We also may have problems over Aegean, Mediterrenean and especially on Cyprus but we had worse times with Greeks before. Waters seems calm in the next decade. So first batches of Kaan's with indigenious engines can be forwarded to the 2 of our major allies and this would mean less than 5 fleets of Kaan's for TurAF until past 2035. 2 fleets of EF's could keep it up for it.
2&3) Kaan will have upgrades after 2030 too. All fighter jets start their career with the need of further improvements. F-16 was developed as an A-A oriented fighter. So was Eurofighter. Both are multi-purpose jets now. F-35 had critical improvements in the past years and it will have more. It might take until 2040 for Kaan to be what is awaited from it. Eurofighter would fill the gap and could be used for reverse engineering (Not copying, legal reverse engineering. Examine it and develop one by yourself too.).
4) Eurofighter is an expensive toy in all terms but it is a very good fighter for sure. It is the best overall fighter alongside the F-15 to me (excluding unproven newborn 5th gen fighters like F-35 and SU-57). We have F-16's but they're the low complementers of the air force. We have our own projects and they're supposed to be good but again, "supposed". Leave alone having a war-proven fighter, we did not have tests to prove them in any real life condition yet. Eurofighter as a proven fighter, even stated as the best fighter in NATO by some of our own pilots who had practice and mission flights alongst and against them, is a good choice for TurAF.
2 other reasons:
4) Its also called not putting all your eggs in one basket.
5) The Turkish air force is currently alarming. While there used to be 200+ F4 phantoms and 200+ F-16s, now this number is: 235 F-16s, 30+ became F-4
Sum:
There is no exact reason we can point for this purchase because we don't know enough just as
@Nutuk said. But all these reasons we have pointed ,either important or little, makes it a good purchase when you gather them together.