TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,984
Reactions
119 18,241
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Some claim the tail boom will house both EW and part of radar suite, some say only a part of the EW suite. But by how BÜRFİS is structured, EW and radar are basically the same thing.

We'll learn more about it in the coming years anyhow.
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,831
Solutions
1
Reactions
47 16,817
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes, i know this. I talked about that in the past. When I mentioned Burfis in the past, I wrote the exact same thing (360 degree radar coverage), but now I have this info that is different than the past info.

Data-link, sensor fusion, IRST, wide-angle AESA radars like Raven, passive sensors, cheek arrays. There are multiple solutions. Of course, having cheek arrays as a brute force solution is good, but cheek arrays don't have the same capability as the nose array. Nose array is bigger, have more power output, and range.
 

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
645
Reactions
3 30 1,327
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
My source directly asked TUSAS official at IDEF but of course it is possible that he might be a marketing person that doesn't have deep knowledge about the project having said that i doubt that and i consider this true unless i see a more reliable source

That's what I mean, I don't want to attack you or declare your source unprofessional, but you know yourself what fanboy talk is. And let's be honest, no matter what technological leaps we've made in the last 10 years, we have to view many things with skepticism and not take every piece of nonsense at face value or treat it as such.
If it were up to fanboys, they'd already be building spaceships with warp drive technology.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,831
Solutions
1
Reactions
47 16,817
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
GwoCyO1WcAA8DD4


GwoCyJTXIAA4C0A


KAAN IVDL, this is not a mock-up.
 

hugh

Contributor
Messages
567
Reactions
17 1,533
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
KAAN's radar, MURAD 600

GwoKmDJWkAE4zrb


i wonder if this is representative of the latest design or an old mock-up they, conveniently, bring from fair to fair.
 

Strong AI

Experienced member
Messages
2,740
Reactions
61 9,902
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey

Bro i didn't say the mockup belongs to MURAD-100. I said it looks smaller than the real MURAD-100, meaning that it doesn't make sense to read something out of that mockup.
 
Last edited:

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
6,415
Reactions
16,445
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Maybe limits of power generation for the AESA radars or maybe because it's not useful to have a AESA radar sticking out of KAAN's butt :unsure:
KAAN's but is already sticking out.they could have used the sticking out part.

1753381399785.jpeg


@Yasar_TR abi,could they have used the ''butt'?
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,214
Reactions
15 1,971
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Do we know if 270 degree is continuous? Maybe its front and back 270° coverage because it would be difficult to have 270 just from the nose, unless they are like angled 90 degrees?
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
10,882
Reactions
152 22,179
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
No reason for it to be non-continuous (radar here is both the nose and cheek combined into a blob), the issue for all a/c is the non-transparent body (to radar):

continuous.jpg


The cheek antennas probably already do a large part in extending coverage to 270 deg, as with nose only its likely less than 180 deg.

I would imagine maybe KAAN develops a DAS (on wings) later to address the 90 degree gap with EO sensor fusion along wings and aft body etc.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,112
Reactions
249 21,493
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
KAAN's but is already sticking out.they could have used the sticking out part.

View attachment 76659

@Yasar_TR abi,could they have used the ''butt'?
You can’t stick that butt out too much. With afterburners on, it gets too hot there.
Also this plane uses a parachute to stop. I have a feeling they may put it there.
Having said that;
Kaan was designed to have AESA radars in both the front and the rear of the aircraft. It was expected to have X-band AESA radars on the side cheeks of the nose and tail. This is to provide wider radar coverage and the capability for both frontal and rear aspect jamming. The rear-looking AESA radar is a unique feature not found on other similar jets. But was part of the design features of Kaan. Where they placed it eludes me. But it was supposed to have it. Fuselage and tail are among places where BURFIS units may have been placed.
I vaguely remember Mr Kotil mentioning the various sensors and radar parts placed all over the plane. If someone can dig that interview up, then it could enlighten us all.
 
Top Bottom