PG-115 has been around longer than PD-155, for domestic market they could use this one. Moreover, PG-115 can be used in place of Rotax engines on Herons, then definitely can be used directly in place of Baykar's.
There are no excuses i think:
CATS wasn't the only and the only , neither the first E/O, there was aselflir 300 etc. Yes heavy but it existed.
Moreover let us not forget Baykar is regional service center&authorized seller of the Wescam products. This information was on their website not long time ago if they haven't removed it.
Now imagine the tantrum if Otokar or FNSS or any other private company , ofcourse except BMC, was being authorized sellers/distributor for MTU products.
The problem is, not every company is being treated the same, they are all strategical but some are more strategical thus even common people and officials defend them at all costs.
Pragmatic and performance reasons: now i really wonder if these reasons will be reconsidered if BMCs engines performs worse than exported ones, or they will be defended to the end against other competitors for sake of being domestic.
The PG-115 engine is a classified engine, as far as I know. I personally never came across any information regarding this engine. The speculation surrounding this engine was about it potentially being used in a Harop type of suicide drone. As to why it wasn't used on TB2, I do not know. I am sure they had their reasons. The Rotax engine is an engine that hasn't got a strategical value in the sense that it isn't hard to find an alternative to it. If PG-115 engine hasn't been used, then I am sure SSB had a reason for it. We also got to consider that there are loads of information behind the scenes that we aren't aware of. A lot of variables and moving parts, starting from engine performance and whether TEI has issue's with it or not, the needs and demands of the military and TB2 itself, the unit costs per engine, are only a couple of things off the top of my head. And usually there are many other variables that can't be foreseen before they actually occur and based on all this dicisions are made.
Especially the unit cost per engine, I think, plays a big factor here.
For instance, the reason that we want to go 80%+ (and having all strategic components to at least have the know-how to make domestically), instead of 100% domestic is for feasibilty and costs per unit. Even strategic components can be imported, if it is cheaper per unit or if it otherwise serves our interests (trade deals with other countries), but wants to have the know-how of it incase there are embargoes, etc. The reasoning behind not using the PG115 engine could be this, or it could simply not be in serial production, or serial production has started but all available units are being reserved for a secret project like suicide drones for example. Like I said, there isn't much known about the PG115, or at least I don't know much about it, so all I can do is speculate.
If Otokar, BMC or FNSS were authorizid distributers or sellers of MTU products, I personally wouldn't mind. If it is regarding components that is. If they were selling end products like whole tanks, than I still wouldn't mind, but I wouldn't see the point considering the Turkish industries strategy. But these are business decisions and it is these companies's own perogative how they go about their business.
And sure, Flirs like Aselflir's did exist before which is fair enough and I acknowledged this in my previous post. But we also got to consider the performance demands of SSB and the military, on top of that how the flir would effect the aerodynamic and performance of TB2 and many other variables that we haven't thought of. I remember reading that Aselflir was causing balancing issue on ATAK when it was still being developed.
We gotta understand, we are looking from the outside and base our judgement and opinions on that. But those people in charge have way more information and performance data to make more sound decisions than us. And I can assure you, none of what the people say regarding things like this that they haven't already considered. They thought of all these arguments even before the product was made. They can't really answer us a lot of times either, because they are basing these decisions based on information and data that they aren't able or willing to share.
I agree that not every company is treated the same, but not in the way you think. I think there is a witch hunt going on against BMC and a little on Baykar currently. Less so on Baykar, but that is because of TB2's performance. BMC and Baykar are being defended by officials and common people is because BMC is being attacked due to political rhetoric. If something or someone is being attacked than naturally there will be those to defend it. The more important thing is to look at the how: what are the arguments used against it? What is the root cause and motive behind these arguments? etc. By objectively analysing this, we can get a fair understanding of what is going on. Same goes for Otokar by they way. I write the almost exact same arguments as I did in this posts if I see unfair critisizm and bashing of Otokar and Koc group (on youtube comments mostly). This is sad and unfair and it only serves for us to shoot ourselves in the foot.
Pragmatic and performance reasons will ofcourse be considered when Tumosan's and BMC's engine start rolling out. They will handle it like SSB have been systematically handling every other project. I am sure that a minor performance difference is tolerated for the sake of domesticity. We have seen many products and components that have gradually improved throughout the years with this aproach. The same tactics will most likely also be used on engine's. But if the performance issue's are more severe, then they will wait for the local product to mature (this happend with KTJ-3200 iirc), and look for imports as a stop-gap. Unless ofcourse there are embargoes in play as well as urgency, then even performance issue's will be less of a factor and make initial batches, etc. It all depends on which scenario plays out. We have seen a few delays over various projects for the sake of improving the products throughout the years. SSB, the military and the industry as a whole know what they are doing, and the overall strategy they have been following has been working out for more than a few decades. They have already started implementing Tumosan engine's in FNSS's 6x6's, so I am sure the demostic engine's performance are at a tolerable level at the least, we still need to see how they perform in the field once they start rolling out en masse, but even then improvements on these products will be made. It's a dynamic process. And yes, there will be problems regarding these various projects, but that is Murhpy's law.