TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,133
Reactions
13 7,936
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What if an early crop of the TF35000 engine get used on unmanned bombers long before they fly on Kaan :unsure: this can effect every other acquisition
 
Last edited:

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
868
Reactions
15 2,268
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
What if an early crop of the TF35000 engine get used on unmanned bombers long before they fly on Kaan :unsure: this can effect every other acquisition
When testing a new engine, the Russians remove one engine from a twin-engine aircraft and install the engine being tested in its place.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,133
Reactions
13 7,936
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
When testing a new engine, the Russians remove one engine from a twin-engine aircraft and install the engine being tested in its place.

I don't mean for testing I mean before the engine is matured to a human rated state it can be used to power a twin engine 35 ton stealth bomber. One might argue that we don't have a big use case for it but if we are not paying top dollar for them we might as well make them as they can be top stealthy making a difference, giving additional capability.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,819
Reactions
225 19,750
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
As far as I know, the real Anka-4 is on the back burner. There is a bigger supersonic version of Anka-3 on the pipeline, but not on the short term.
Bro, how are they going to fly a flying wing in supersonic domain? Anka-3 is a flying wing. The wing thickness will have to be so thin that it is not feasible for constructional stability if supersonic flight is expected from a flying wing.

A sans vertical stabiliser delta wing design, may be! Then you have the lack of control surfaces to give you manoeuvrability. But it is then possible. But that won’t be Anka-3.

There are NO supersonic flying wings in real life. Both Chinese H20 and B21 are subsonic aircrafts.
 

zio

Contributor
Messages
482
Reactions
11 674
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Can the alrborne electronic attack planes like compass call,or Turkish hava soj can disrupt links beteen satallite and UAV?.
 

Kitra

Active member
Messages
138
Reactions
5 343
Nation of residence
Sweden
Nation of origin
Turkey
Can the alrborne electronic attack planes like compass call,or Turkish hava soj can disrupt links beteen satallite and UAV?.
Depends on the receiving antenna. It can jam if it is omnidirectional antenna like you have on your phone. It will not jam if it directional antenna like your satellite dish antenna.
 

I_Love_F16

Contributor
France Correspondent
Messages
896
Reactions
17 1,897
Nation of residence
France
Nation of origin
France
Bro, how are they going to fly a flying wing in supersonic domain? Anka-3 is a flying wing. The wing thickness will have to be so thin that it is not feasible for constructional stability if supersonic flight is expected from a flying wing.

A sans vertical stabiliser delta wing design, may be! Then you have the lack of control surfaces to give you manoeuvrability. But it is then possible. But that won’t be Anka-3.

There are NO supersonic flying wings in real life. Both Chinese H20 and B21 are subsonic aircrafts.

When some of our officials says that they are developing a supersonic flying wing, I feel like they don’t know what they’re talking about. Either that, or they say it for propaganda purposes. When I hear flying wing, the first things that comes to my mind are stealth and range. If for some reason you want your flying wing to be supersonic, you most probably need to put engines with afterburners on it. But then you are compromising the most important attributs I wrote above, which is stealth and range.
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,782
Solutions
1
Reactions
46 16,672
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bro, how are they going to fly a flying wing in supersonic domain? Anka-3 is a flying wing. The wing thickness will have to be so thin that it is not feasible for constructional stability if supersonic flight is expected from a flying wing.

A sans vertical stabiliser delta wing design, may be! Then you have the lack of control surfaces to give you manoeuvrability. But it is then possible. But that won’t be Anka-3.

There are NO supersonic flying wings in real life. Both Chinese H20 and B21 are subsonic aircrafts.
Anka-3 is seen as both a military asset and a testing platform for cracking new technologies (stealth, sensor positioning, flying wing stability). Maybe TUSAS will add wing tip control surfaces, maybe TUSAS will use active controlling with targeted jets on control surfaces, or maybe 2D,3D vectoring will come into the picture. TUSAS wants a highly stealth wingman that can supercruise together with KAAN. The latest idea was to turn Anka-3 into a dual-engine aircraft with stronger engines.
 
Last edited:

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,819
Reactions
225 19,750
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
If for some reason you want your flying wing to be supersonic, you most probably need to put engines with afterburners on it
Not necessarily bro!
An aircraft can go supersonic without afterburners. (Supercruise). All you need is diverging nozzles. When the nozzle opens up the air going through it becomes supersonic.
In fact it is possible to go low supersonic without diverging nozzles for a short while.

Maybe TUSAS will add wing tip control surfaces, maybe TUSAS will use active controlling with targeted jets on control surfaces, or maybe 2D,3D vectoring….
Bro, those are a lot of “may be”s !
But it doesn’t detract from the fact that technically, due to below stated primary reasons taken from various articles, it just isn’t feasible to build supersonic flying wings:

1. High Drag:
A flying wing design is inherently low drag, which integrates the fuselage and the wing into a single thick airfoil shape. This results in a large frontal area. Although this is efficient for subsonic flight, it creates significant wave drag as it approaches and exceeds the speed of sound, which requires enormous power to overcome.

2. Aerodynamic Instability:
Supersonic and subsonic aerodynamics are very different. At transonic and supersonic speeds, the centre of pressure makes the aircraft very unstable and difficult to control. Flying wings don‘t have vertical and horizontal stabilizers which are critical for stability and control at supersonic speeds.

3. Design Compromises:
To overcome the drag and stability issues at supersonic speeds, a wing must be very thin and long, like the ones on the Concorde or military jets. Such a design, however, performs poorly at low speeds (takeoff and landing), requiring a high angle of attack and faster landing speeds. A "flying wing" design optimized for cargo or passenger capacity (deep and thick) inherently compromises the sleek, low-drag shape needed for supersonic flight.

4. Control Surface Challenges:
The shock waves that form at supersonic speeds can make conventional control surfaces, especially at the wingtips, ineffective or even cause them to produce the opposite of the intended response, leading to potential structural failure and loss of control.

So consequentially, the complex engineering that is needed make it impractical and close to impossible to design a stable and efficient flying wing that is capable of sustained supersonic speeds without structural deficiencies.

The only technically viable solution to this dilemma is a biderectional flying wing that is described in NASA’s related article. This aircraft can go supersonic in fig 8 flight. And subsonic in fig 9 flight. In other words it has to swivel round to go supersonic or subsonic.

1765903558816.jpeg

 

I_Love_F16

Contributor
France Correspondent
Messages
896
Reactions
17 1,897
Nation of residence
France
Nation of origin
France
Not necessarily bro!
An aircraft can go supersonic without afterburners. (Supercruise). All you need is diverging nozzles. When the nozzle opens up the air going through it becomes supersonic.
In fact it is possible to go low supersonic without diverging nozzles for a short while.

You’re right, an aircraft can supercruise, but what about a fully loaded Anka-3 with one TF-10000 ? Do you think it can realistically supercruise or will it need it’s afterburner ?
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,133
Reactions
13 7,936
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
They made Anka3 pointier than the typical wing plane, it is inevitable it gets some speed tickets down the road.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,819
Reactions
225 19,750
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
You’re right, an aircraft can supercruise, but what about a fully loaded Anka-3 with one TF-10000 ? Do you think it can realistically supercruise or will it need it’s afterburner ?
Bro, designwise Anka-3 is a flying wing. It can’t supercruise. Full stop.
It can not go supersonic. Full stop.
It doesn’t matter what engine you put on it. It is designed as a subsonic plane. If you install TF10000 engine on to Anka-3, it‘s afterburner will help it with taking off whilst carrying more weight or from a shorter runway. It can’t make it go supersonic.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom