Live Conflict Ukraine-Russia War

Woland

Committed member
Moderator
Ukraine Moderator
Messages
198
Reactions
6 619
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Ukraine
House Foreign Affairs Chairman McCaul stated that Ukraine is about to get permission to strike back:
Some context. Four days ago it was confirmed that Iran provided Russia with ballistic missiles. Meanwhile McCaul reported that Blinken told him three days ago that Ukraine will receive permission to use ATACMS missiles on Russian bases. I think it is very likely this is the reason permission is finally being granted.

And in other news, Biden has sent Congress the long-awaited Ukraine strategy report, as mandated by the April Supplemental.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
549
Reactions
9 707
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Some context. Four days ago it was confirmed that Iran provided Russia with ballistic missiles. Meanwhile McCaul reported that Blinken told him three days ago that Ukraine will receive permission to use ATACMS missiles on Russian bases. I think it is very likely this is the reason permission is finally being granted.
I don't speak Pharsi but if I did I might send the Iranian leader a message of thanks. A few Iranian ballistic missiles cannot damage Ukraine as much as the US has done by preventing weapons being used to strike inside Russia at the origin of attacks against Ukraine.
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,066
Solutions
1
Reactions
34 14,482
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
House Foreign Affairs Chairman McCaul stated that Ukraine is about to get permission to strike back:
Some context. Four days ago it was confirmed that Iran provided Russia with ballistic missiles. Meanwhile McCaul reported that Blinken told him three days ago that Ukraine will receive permission to use ATACMS missiles on Russian bases. I think it is very likely this is the reason permission is finally being granted.

And in other news, Biden has sent Congress the long-awaited Ukraine strategy report, as mandated by the April Supplemental.
That is a good move in the right direction. The first targets should be missile, UAV, gliding bomb and artillery shell production facilities and any facility providing required materials to those facilities. Russian firepower superiority has to be reduced at all costs.
 

Relic

Experienced member
Canada Correspondent
Messages
1,812
Reactions
14 2,772
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Canada
The UK 🇬🇧 announced a new $781 million usd package for Ukraine that consists of both defense articles and macro financial funding. The contents of the package are as follows.

- 650 Martlet air defense missiles
- Thousands of 155mm artillery shells
- Additional undisclosed armored vehicles
- $315 million usd in government funding
- $100 million usd in humanitarian funding
- $26 million usd in energy grid funding

 

Woland

Committed member
Moderator
Ukraine Moderator
Messages
198
Reactions
6 619
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Ukraine
US announced $700m in aid:

The latest American aid package includes $325 million in energy support to help repair and restore Ukraine’s power generation facilities, provide emergency backup power for critical services and strengthen the physical security of energy infrastructure.

Some $290 million will fund food, water, shelter, health care and education programs for Ukrainians in need in the country and refugees outside the country.

The remaining $102 million will be used for mine-removal work.
 

Lool

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,918
Reactions
13 5,030
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Albania
That is a good move in the right direction. The first targets should be missile, UAV, gliding bomb and artillery shell production facilities and any facility providing required materials to those facilities. Russian firepower superiority has to be reduced at all costs.
Wont do shit
Western media already reported that all critical military infrastructure within Russia have been moved away from the range of Stormshadow missiles and Russia has reportedly finished upgrading their FABs to strike with a heavier tonnage and longer distances

This decision came too late for Ukraine

Finally, the war is in jeopardy with reports that Ukraine just doesnt have that many men to continue the war. Ever since the Kursk operation/desperation and I realised that Ukraine's govt knew it was fqed and will not win this war but will eventually lose the most richest area in Ukraine to Russia

All hail the clown, Zelensky
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,228
Reactions
108 19,433
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
What happens next? An apology saying it was a mistake? I imagine it was.
I don't think it was a mistake. They showed their determination, but regardless of that, nothing will change. I don't even believe an apology will come, but we may see some diplomatic traffic in the next coming hours or days.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
549
Reactions
9 707
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom

The west really likes to play with fire huh, escalation after escalation until the point where Russia will have no choice and we will start getting hit by nuclear weapons, damn id*ots.
The West was frightened when Russia invaded Ukraine and that fear indirectly allowed Putin to set the rules of engagement in his war of aggression. The legendary Red army was expected to overwhelm Ukraine in a matter of days or weeks. It transpired that the strength of the Red army, while legendary, was just that - legendary, not real.

The West later started breaking Putin's rules of engagement with no real reaction. Red line after red line has been crossed without Russia resorting to the nuclear option, having hinted it would.

No reason to toe Putin's line. Every country under attack has the right to strike the country attacking it. Putin may be able to intimidate the US administration but that does not make him able to change the rules of war.
 
Last edited:

Woland

Committed member
Moderator
Ukraine Moderator
Messages
198
Reactions
6 619
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Ukraine

FiReFTW

Active member
Messages
107
Reactions
2 134
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Switzerland
The West was frightened when Russia invaded Ukraine and that fear indirectly allowed Putin to set the rules of engagement in his war of aggression. The legendary Red army was expected to overwhelm Ukraine in a matter of days or weeks. It transpired that the strength of the Red army, while legendary, was just that - legendary, not real.

The West later started breaking Putin's rules of engagement with no real reaction. Red line after red line has been crossed without Russia resorting to the nuclear option, having hinted it would.

No reason to toe Putin's line. Every country under attack has the right to strike the country attacking it. Putin may be able to intimidate the US administration but that does not make him able to change the rules of war.
Because they are not reckless and St*pid but surely you realize you can't keep escalating forever right? There is a point where someone will have had enough, when backed into a corner with no exit.

Or do you think this can go on forever? The escalation? You think if NATO invaded Russia and would be at the doorsteps of Moscow they would still not use nukes? It's an exaggeration but hopefully you get my point.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
549
Reactions
9 707
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Because they are not reckless and St*pid but surely you realize you can't keep escalating forever right? There is a point where someone will have had enough, when backed into a corner with no exit.

Or do you think this can go on forever? The escalation? You think if NATO invaded Russia and would be at the doorsteps of Moscow they would still not use nukes? It's an exaggeration but hopefully you get my point.
What has happened? Russia decided to attack Ukraine, expecting Ukraine to fold in a few days by the Red army taking Kiev. Unexpectedly that did not happen. A large number of countries then decided to support Ukraine by supplying it with weapons. Many countries that supplied weapons to Ukraine forbade Ukraine to use them to strike at targets in Russia, such as military bases used to strike Ukraine.

Tell me, are North Korea and Iran supplying weapons to Russia with the proviso that they must not be used to strike at military bases within Ukraine? I don't think so.

What Ukraine is asking is for permission to use the weapons it has to undermine Russia's ability to attack it by hitting at the source of those attacks inside Russia. In my view it is logical and legal for a country under attack to try to reduce the incidence of attacks it suffers by striking at their source.

Escalation: the ultimate escalation is to replace a state of peace with a state of war, as Russia has done.
 

Anastasius

Contributor
Moderator
Azerbaijan Moderator
Messages
1,415
Reactions
5 3,139
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
Because they are not reckless and St*pid but surely you realize you can't keep escalating forever right? There is a point where someone will have had enough, when backed into a corner with no exit.

Or do you think this can go on forever? The escalation? You think if NATO invaded Russia and would be at the doorsteps of Moscow they would still not use nukes? It's an exaggeration but hopefully you get my point.
The moment Russia uses nuclear weapons, it gets royally raped with 3 times as many nuclear weapons in return. And NATO has systems in place to intercept nuclear missiles with some degree of reliability. Russia has absolutely no way to stop any US or allied nukes from hitting any target in Russia that they like.
 
Last edited:

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
549
Reactions
9 707
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Because they are not reckless and St*pid but surely you realize you can't keep escalating forever right? There is a point where someone will have had enough, when backed into a corner with no exit.

Or do you think this can go on forever?
US, EU, Canada, Norway, UK can afford to go on for ever. Russia cannot. But will Ukraine's supporters change their mind and force Ukraine to sue for peace?
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom