Latest Thread

TR TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

DBdev

Committed member
Messages
282
Reactions
8 497
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I couldn't find link to his speech but after first taxi test Kotil said KAAN could have flew (9 months ago) if he knew how far ahead of projections TF-X project was. He could have installed flight computer software etc back in March. So I highly doubt this "journalist" or the site who are not even aware of most basic rules of journalism.

"Reporters are expected to be as accurate as possible given the time allotted to story preparation and the space available and to seek reliable sources. Properly using their sources and using accurate quoting and use of words from interview or conversation.
  • Events with a single eyewitness are reported with attribution. Events with two or more independent eyewitnesses may be reported as fact. Controversial facts are reported with attribution.
  • Independent fact-checking by another employee of the publisher is desirable. In 2018 "The Acton Plan" was created to help check information more effectively to hopefully get rid of false information.[18]
  • Corrections are published when errors are discovered. These corrections are called corrigendum in newspapers, they feature after on the next issue published.
  • Defendants at trial are treated only as having "allegedly" committed crimes, until conviction, when their crimes are generally reported as fact (unless, that is, there is serious controversy about wrongful conviction). In most publications, when defendants are convicted or pleaded guilty they will replace "allegedly" with "convicted of", "pleaded guilty to", or "found guilty of" in their reporting to avoid the small chance of a defamation issue in the event of a wrongful conviction.
  • Opinion surveys and statistical information deserve special treatment to communicate in precise terms any conclusions, to contextualize the results, and to specify accuracy, including estimated error and methodological criticism or flaws. Through this information can be properly analyzed and used without heavy bias.
  • Journalism today is built off true, accurate and objective information.[19] To remove those aspects would be damaging to the very core of not just journalism but also the very way information is spread and given to viewers and others all around the world. The audience will see the lack of ethics and standards, making others question what is good, reliable information, or not."
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,225
Reactions
22 18,911
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
let’s wait and see. I would love it if things around Hürjet was more clear. Like mking progress and such.
 

Samba

Active member
Messages
60
Reactions
2 122
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
let’s wait and see. I would love it if things around Hürjet was more clear. Like mking progress and such.
Bayraktar keeps saying Kızılelma eill be ready for mass production in 2024. Yet we don't hear about from KE as we do with TB3.

I assume tests on strategic assets are not released to the public as much.

We know Hürjet activated afterburner too but we don't know what is the current status. Right?
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,043
Solutions
1
Reactions
11 2,887
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bayraktar keeps saying Kızılelma eill be ready for mass production in 2024. Yet we don't hear about from KE as we do with TB3.

I assume tests on strategic assets are not released to the public as much.

We know Hürjet activated afterburner too but we don't know what is the current status. Right?
It becomes redundant after a while, they might be flying them every day testing this system or that part but not all of it would make sense to the public. I think after a certain point, we would only hear about certain milestones or important events, like when weapon integration is done on KE or something like that.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,207
Solutions
2
Reactions
100 23,279
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bayraktar keeps saying Kızılelma eill be ready for mass production in 2024. Yet we don't hear about from KE as we do with TB3.

I assume tests on strategic assets are not released to the public as much.

We know Hürjet activated afterburner too but we don't know what is the current status. Right?
They (Baykar) are working on a thing related to KE. We may all guess what it is based on tests they have conducted so far.
 

BaburKhan

Well-known member
Messages
339
Reactions
5 777
Website
www.instagram.com
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Germany
They (Baykar) are working on a thing related to KE. We may all guess what it is based on tests they have conducted so far.
1701782483214.png


This one ?
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
992
Reactions
8 3,546
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
They (Baykar) are working on a thing related to KE. We may all guess what it is based on tests they have conducted so far.
They are working on weapons integrations, nothing shady or secret.

What is KE worth without weapons? All these tests with different type of bombs, missiles from different weapon station and different loads will take a while. Nothing unusual!
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,207
Solutions
2
Reactions
100 23,279
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
They are working on weapons integrations, nothing shady or secret.

What is KE worth without weapons? All these tests with different type of bombs, missiles from different weapon station and different loads will take a while. Nothing unusual!
I think KE has more than just weapon integration to be ready for the service.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,066
Reactions
118 14,973
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why? I might be wrong but neither TF-6000 nor the Ukranian engine they are using now has that capability as far as I can remember. Why would it be able to supercruise when the engines it does/might use doesn't have that capability?
If the engine has convergent/divergent nozzle structure and the plane is high enough with the right load, it can do supersonic speeds. Even with a convergent nozzle it can achieve supersonic speeds albeit for a short duration.
Ukrainian engine it has at the moment is already short of power. So that is out of the question. But an engine like TF6000 or AI322F(5500lbf) should provide ample power for short supersonic (at least transonic) speeds.

It is more logical to think that a 5-6000lbf dry thrust engined KE, will fly at high subsonic or even transonic speeds.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,043
Solutions
1
Reactions
11 2,887
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
It is more logical to think that a 5-6000lbf dry thrust engined KE, will fly at high subsonic or even transonic speeds.
This is my expectation as well, at least at first, until it starts using TF-10000 or something similar. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the plan for 2 engined KE is with TF-10000 for supersonic speeds. And until that is ready they can LRIP this version of KE with single engine, so long as they can get the engines of course. Now that I think about it, it might even be something like KE-A with a single AI322F, KE-B with a single TF-6000 and KE-C with 2 TF-10000.

God I wish we also designed an actual fighter jet that could take advantage of using 2 TF-10000, that would give it a thrust close to Gripen. That would've made our lives so much easier.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,066
Reactions
118 14,973
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
This is my expectation as well, at least at first, until it starts using TF-10000 or something similar. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the plan for 2 engined KE is with TF-10000 for supersonic speeds. And until that is ready they can LRIP this version of KE with single engine, so long as they can get the engines of course. Now that I think about it, it might even be something like KE-A with a single AI322F, KE-B with a single TF-6000 and KE-C with 2 TF-10000.

God I wish we also designed an actual fighter jet that could take advantage of using 2 TF-10000, that would give it a thrust close to Gripen. That would've made our lives so much easier.
“Being able to get engines” dilemma, can be resolved if they approached RR for the Adour engine. It can be the replacement engine until TF6000 is ready. Even Honeywell f124/125 can be considered. The Honeywell engines are both RR engines, even though produced in US. Yet Adour engines are made in Derby-UK.

2 x TF10000 engines may look like it will be an overkill for a KE aircraft. But Infact it would create a monster. Not having a pilot would be an advantage when it came to manoeuvring, and as it is a stealthier plane than a Gripen E it would make a real winner of a jet fighter.

Using 2 x TF10000 for a conventional piloted stealth fighter could have given us a light fighter with a lot of punch at a good price point. (Until TF10000 came we could have used 2 x RR Adour with AB) But somehow we went for an US engined Hurjet when we knew we may not get the engines for our fighter version!!
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,198
Reactions
67 7,789
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
TAI or Baykar needs to develop a starter generator/auxiliary power unit for TF-6000 that can generate up to 50kw. Otherwise it may not be sufficient to power all those sophisticated high end avionics and sensors.
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,818
Reactions
11,849
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Good question. It is still not late to do so. Probably dealing with a war thorn Ukraine was easier than a RR that holds stronger cards in hand.
Since we currently have a somewhat good relation with the Britisch,it could be possible.
Lets face it,these old soviet engines(KE,ATAK 2) are not up to it.
 

Merzifonlu

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
691
Reactions
24 2,053
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
How long have we been talking about turbine engines with the British? It's been a while, isn't it? How many RR engines have we bought, never mind built under license? "0". ZERO in writing. Pretty interesting, isn't it?
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,564
Reactions
7 7,216
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
An upgrade of the TF10000 engine made with next generation turbine blade technology can be used to create capable twin engine fighters with possibly 10-15% power increase over previous generation.
 
Last edited:

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,043
Solutions
1
Reactions
11 2,887
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
How long have we been talking about turbine engines with the British? It's been a while, isn't it? How many RR engines have we bought, never mind built under license? "0". ZERO in writing. Pretty interesting, isn't it?
I'm willing to bet that it has more to with Tusaş wanting to continue using Pratt & Whitney engines which they've been not just using but building for a long time than RR's unwillingness to cooperate with us. And another bet I would happily take is that they would love to have us as customers as that would bump their market share a fair bit.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom