Latest Thread
Bayraktar keeps saying Kızılelma eill be ready for mass production in 2024. Yet we don't hear about from KE as we do with TB3.let’s wait and see. I would love it if things around Hürjet was more clear. Like mking progress and such.
It becomes redundant after a while, they might be flying them every day testing this system or that part but not all of it would make sense to the public. I think after a certain point, we would only hear about certain milestones or important events, like when weapon integration is done on KE or something like that.Bayraktar keeps saying Kızılelma eill be ready for mass production in 2024. Yet we don't hear about from KE as we do with TB3.
I assume tests on strategic assets are not released to the public as much.
We know Hürjet activated afterburner too but we don't know what is the current status. Right?
They (Baykar) are working on a thing related to KE. We may all guess what it is based on tests they have conducted so far.Bayraktar keeps saying Kızılelma eill be ready for mass production in 2024. Yet we don't hear about from KE as we do with TB3.
I assume tests on strategic assets are not released to the public as much.
We know Hürjet activated afterburner too but we don't know what is the current status. Right?
What is your guess?They (Baykar) are working on a thing related to KE. We may all guess what it is based on tests they have conducted so far.
They (Baykar) are working on a thing related to KE. We may all guess what it is based on tests they have conducted so far.
They are working on weapons integrations, nothing shady or secret.They (Baykar) are working on a thing related to KE. We may all guess what it is based on tests they have conducted so far.
I think KE has more than just weapon integration to be ready for the service.They are working on weapons integrations, nothing shady or secret.
What is KE worth without weapons? All these tests with different type of bombs, missiles from different weapon station and different loads will take a while. Nothing unusual!
If the engine has convergent/divergent nozzle structure and the plane is high enough with the right load, it can do supersonic speeds. Even with a convergent nozzle it can achieve supersonic speeds albeit for a short duration.Why? I might be wrong but neither TF-6000 nor the Ukranian engine they are using now has that capability as far as I can remember. Why would it be able to supercruise when the engines it does/might use doesn't have that capability?
This is my expectation as well, at least at first, until it starts using TF-10000 or something similar. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the plan for 2 engined KE is with TF-10000 for supersonic speeds. And until that is ready they can LRIP this version of KE with single engine, so long as they can get the engines of course. Now that I think about it, it might even be something like KE-A with a single AI322F, KE-B with a single TF-6000 and KE-C with 2 TF-10000.It is more logical to think that a 5-6000lbf dry thrust engined KE, will fly at high subsonic or even transonic speeds.
“Being able to get engines” dilemma, can be resolved if they approached RR for the Adour engine. It can be the replacement engine until TF6000 is ready. Even Honeywell f124/125 can be considered. The Honeywell engines are both RR engines, even though produced in US. Yet Adour engines are made in Derby-UK.This is my expectation as well, at least at first, until it starts using TF-10000 or something similar. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the plan for 2 engined KE is with TF-10000 for supersonic speeds. And until that is ready they can LRIP this version of KE with single engine, so long as they can get the engines of course. Now that I think about it, it might even be something like KE-A with a single AI322F, KE-B with a single TF-6000 and KE-C with 2 TF-10000.
God I wish we also designed an actual fighter jet that could take advantage of using 2 TF-10000, that would give it a thrust close to Gripen. That would've made our lives so much easier.
So,why didnt they?if they approached RR for the Adour engine
Good question. It is still not too late to do so. Probably dealing with a war torn Ukraine was easier than a RR that holds stronger cards in hand.So,why didnt they?
Since we currently have a somewhat good relation with the Britisch,it could be possible.Good question. It is still not late to do so. Probably dealing with a war thorn Ukraine was easier than a RR that holds stronger cards in hand.
I'm willing to bet that it has more to with Tusaş wanting to continue using Pratt & Whitney engines which they've been not just using but building for a long time than RR's unwillingness to cooperate with us. And another bet I would happily take is that they would love to have us as customers as that would bump their market share a fair bit.How long have we been talking about turbine engines with the British? It's been a while, isn't it? How many RR engines have we bought, never mind built under license? "0". ZERO in writing. Pretty interesting, isn't it?
Times have changed,who knows.How long have we been talking about turbine engines with the British? It's been a while, isn't it? How many RR engines have we bought, never mind built under license? "0". ZERO in writing. Pretty interesting, isn't it?