Any conformation by officials?According to a former Millitairy Acedemic Eray Gucluer told in a tv program, that they hit a drone 50cm(SIMSEK drone) long from a distance of 170km with SIPER. He says it goes with mach 5 speeds to the target.
"09:35 min, we will increase the range from 170km to 600km??"According to a former Millitairy Acedemic Eray Gucluer told in a tv program, that they hit a drone 50cm(SIMSEK drone) long from a distance of 170km with SIPER. He says it goes with mach 5 speeds to the target.
"09:35 min, we will increase the range from 170km to 600km??"
Any conformation by officials?
TAF will recieve new AD Systems in the coming Years like Hisar-A +/O+ and Siper, but what is with Gürz and Gökdemir ?
Or Sapan.TAF will recieve new AD Systems in the coming Years like Hisar-A +/O+ and Siper, but what is with Gürz and Gökdemir ?
Sapan is for navy and is in works.Or Sapan.
Sapan is for navy and is in works.
No. TSK will buy Gürz.Those are probably for export market.
Initially, it doesn't look like Turkish Armed Forces are interested in these systems.
I think you're a bit confused there mate, because Oerlikon is just 35mm aa guns and not a missile system. The modernisation just allows it to use the same radar as Hisar, I think.Hence, it is theoretically possible for modernized Oerlikon batteries to also launch O+ IIR missiles without any modifications.
Read and look at this picture again.I think you're a bit confused there mate, because Oerlikon is just 35mm aa guns and not a missile system. The modernisation just allows it to use the same radar as Hisar, I think.
Those are not Oerlikon "batteries" those guns are Oerlikon guns, built by MKE and modernised by AselsanRead and look at this picture again.
At some point, Hisar-A has been conceptually incorporated into Oerlikon batteries (for base protection), but then it was said that Hisar-A wouldn't be part of it. I am not sure of the current situation, however given the specifications and duties of the A+ missile, it should be part of the Oerlikon battery. As I recall, Hisar-A also has the towed version, which seems reasonable for the earlier statement.Those are not Oerlikon "batteries" those guns are Oerlikon guns, built by MKE and modernised by Aselsan
I don't what that launcher is, but it isn't a part of Oerlikon aa system. It is either Hisar or something else.
Those are not Oerlikon "batteries" those guns are Oerlikon guns, built by MKE and modernised by Aselsan
I don't what that launcher is, but it isn't a part of Oerlikon aa system. It is either Hisar or something else.
Again, Oerlikon 35mm guns were modernized to use the same fire control system to be used with aa missile batteries, but they are not an inseparable part of them. We just put 35mm guns with Hisar batteries under the same control system to make them operate together. They also operate completely separately as they do for us and dozen or so countries around the world. It's semantics at this point, let's agree to disagree mate.You are wrong. That launcher is a Hisar-A FFS launcher and is part of the modernized Oerlikon battery.
Here you can read this.
"The AIC System is an air defence system developed for the effective air defence of critical facilities and fixed military units.
defence system. The AIC system will undertake the fire and command control of the 35 mm towed air defence guns modernised by ASELSAN and the Low Altitude Air Defence Missile Launch System (HİSAR-A FFS), which is also being developed by ASELSAN within the scope of the HİSAR project."
Hisar-A FFS is basically the same thing with Hisar-O FSS the only difference is one is loaded with Hisar-A+ missiles the other is loaded with Hisar-O+ missiles.
Here is the proof.
Land forces chose to distribute a low amount of Hisar-A FFS to Oerlikon batteries and mix Oerlikons with Hisar-A to achieve a cost-effective solution. Land forces freed up the budget and used most of the budget to get Hisar-O+ batteries with this approach.