LEVENT
Göksur vs Levent ! Which one would you prefer?
Levent utilizes favorly affordable radars for 360 degree coverage, which is logical to cut prices down since the backward facing radars are merely for scanning, not tracking. If they upscale it to 20+ missiles this system could be an ultimate anti-drone, anti-loitering munition protection system with the Block 1 missiles. These missiles are also light on the weight thus has smaller logistic footprint and could be replenished by personnel without needing a winch or elevator. Could be affordable by many navies and integrated as a standalone solution.
Goksur outperforms Levent in terms of radar and missile performance; range, tracking&classification and missile range&kinetics performance. This leads to higher acquisition cost, larger logistical footprint, necessity of winch and elevator for the missile installation. Becomes suitable for large corvettes and frigates/destroyers.
In my opinion both should be devoloped and procured for different platforms. Levent would suit to YTKB, auxillaries, OPVs, USVs, Landing ships/crafts while Goksur would be beneficial for LHD, Ada, I-Class, TF-2000 and others that may emerge within the given range.
For the obvious reasons Goksur outperforms with a better radar, better missile (Bozdogan-Gokdogan-?), but Levent provides the best logistical footprint, decent protection at an affordable price. Levent was first critisized for the radar facing-angle, yet these are 2-way scanning aesa radar that may cover the horizon sufficiently but a better focus up on the sky, hence the loitering-diving drones-munitions.
As i expected i say that we should have all as now we are an exporter for these systems and there are potential customers for these non-existent kind of systems. I also believe Aselsan should continue development of hybrid systems (gun-missile combined Goker-D)