TR Air Defence Programs

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,485
Reactions
76 8,419
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh

Türkiye starts works for integrated air defense system 'Steel Dome'​

ANKARA​

Türkiye starts works for integrated air defense system Steel Dome

Türkiye has decided to launch works to develop an integrated multilayered air defense system called the Steel Dome.


The decision was taken at the Defense Industry Executive Committee meeting on Aug. 6 under the leadership of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and with the participation of senior civilian and military officials.

A statement after the meeting underlined that the committee discussed ongoing and future top projects in the light of the achievements in the field of defense industry.

“Assessments were made of the level achieved by Türkiye’s defense industry, future goals and critical projects,” the country’s Communications Directorate said on X. “The commitment to supporting the domestic and national defense industry was underlined,” it added.

During the meeting, the Steel Dome Project was discussed, which focuses on integrating layered air defense systems, sensors and weapons into a network, providing a common air picture in real time and using artificial intelligence to assist decision-makers.

Türkiye has developed a number of indigenous air defense systems in recent years and is planning to combine all these systems under the Steel Dome, which will provide the protection of Türkiye’s entire air space.


The meeting also discussed projects for air defense and missile systems, Türkiye’s homegrown fighter jet Kaan, UAVs (drones) Bayraktar TB3, Akinci and Aksungur, and various unmanned aerial and maritime vehicles.

Turkish UAVs have gained fame in such conflicts as Ukraine and won contracts from countries around the world. A growing percentage of weapons and vehicles used by the Turkish Armed Forces are also made domestically.

“The meeting also addressed projects for enhancing the country's space access capabilities, systems for improving situational awareness on land, air and sea, electronic warfare systems, and defense systems against mini/micro UAVs and swarm-capable kamikaze unmanned maritime vehicles,” it added.

Projects for modernizing tanks and fighter jets, developing engines and power systems for vehicles, and procuring command, control and communication systems were also discussed during the meeting, it added.

Highlighting satisfaction with the progress in Türkiye’s defense industry, the meeting underlined the need to continue with increased determination using domestic technologies.


That's German IRIS-T SLM in the photo.🙄
 

Strong AI

Contributor
Messages
651
Reactions
25 2,877
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
IMHO "future dome" would be a good name, because:
  • A reference to "istikbal göklerdedir"
  • All its systems will be updated continuously
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,491
Reactions
31 4,344
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The best cool side is all layers from long range high altitude to very short range could be controlled and monitored from Headquarter of Türkish Armed Forces.

Unfortunately we currently just have radio communication between operators.
 

Oublious

Experienced member
The Netherlands Correspondent
Messages
2,070
Reactions
7 4,437
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey


they have learned a lot of from Ukraine war.
 
Last edited:

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,387
Reactions
29 19,228
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
That could be due to all the loitering and missiles used by Russia, and it's easier to gather data and input especially considering our friendly stance with Ukraine I imagine they'd be willing to share with us.

And if more of Türkiyes defence products are being used we probably get plenty of feedback.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,122
Solutions
1
Reactions
11 3,094
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
That could be due to all the loitering and missiles used by Russia, and it's easier to gather data and input especially considering our friendly stance with Ukraine I imagine they'd be willing to share with us.

And if more of Türkiyes defence products are being used we probably get plenty of feedback.
Not just Russia, I bet. We've all seen both sides lose armoured vehicles and tanks to missiles and drones (whether kamikaze drones or munition/mine dropping ones) whenever they step out of their aa umbrella, so to speak. I think the lesson we (and many other countries) have learned is the usual solutions we have is not good enough and armoured assets need better protection, hence our interest in Gürz.
 

zio

Well-known member
Messages
344
Reactions
4 473
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
If we have anti balistic capability,it would close the hole of the our steel dome system. There are some missing parts like airborne awacs of our own.However any country with air defence systems with different origins could not start to make up from beginning to have their dome system that would be too costly.
 
Last edited:

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,121
Reactions
127 15,373
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Air defence systems are a must. We know that. But how good are they?

Israel boasts that their Iron dome is 85% efficient. Yet in reality this is lower. So much so that after the recent events, Israel refuses to give figures about the interception efficacy of their system.
We don’t have to talk about the Russian S300 and S400 systems. They have shown themselves to be easy targets in Ukraine.
US has multi layer systems like Patriots. Thaad and SM series missile systems that perform quite well. Yet can still be victims to missiles. Also these are not really a “Swiss Knife” type of defensive weapons that can be applied to all.

It is a fact that AD systems are not cheap. Their missiles are costly. You may have to use a couple of million dollar missile to ntercept a cheap UAV or cheap short range missile.

So it is a fact that even the best of the best is not a foolproof answer to protect your country’s skies.

Air defence systems are there to decrease the amount of damage you may incur in the event of aerial bombing. Best defence is a good offence. A good offence that can take out your opponents AD systems and aerial assets, will be the best deterrent there is. They have to know that they will lose hell of a great deal more if they try to confront you.
For that we need to develop hypersonic weapons which will have hypersonic speeds at the terminal phase as they hit their targets.
Due to termİnal velocity law a ballistic missile’s terminal speed is limited by it’s weight and it’s aerodynamic design/drag coefficient.
An ICBM that weighs close to a 100ton can hit the target at speeds in excess of 8mach. Yet a ballistic missile like trg300 or Bora may only manage 1-2 mach at best.
Yet there are guided hypersonic artillery rounds that can be fired from howitzers. These have special design features that allow the projectile to have very low drag due to aerodynamic design. BAE Systems have tested these using 127mm naval guns. These rounds can have ranges close to 110 km. Where as an ESSM may cost 2 million dollars and a RAM 1 million, these rounds will be around 75-100K.
Because of the kinetic energy they carry they may not even need to carry explosives to cause destructive damage at the target.
View attachment 1723204927337.jpeg
1723206041751.jpeg

1723205059887.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
4,886
Reactions
93 18,114
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
Air defence systems are a must. We know that. But how good are they?

Israel boasts that their Iron dome is 85% efficient. Yet in reality this is lower. So much so that after the recent events, Israel refuses to give figures about the interception efficacy of their system.
We don’t have to talk about the Russian S300 and S400 systems. They have shown themselves to be easy targets in Ukraine.
US has multi layer systems like Patriots. Thaad and SM series missile systems that perform quite well. Yet van still be victims to missiles. Also these are not really a “Swiss Knife” type of defensive weapons that can be applied to all.

It is a fact that AD systems are not cheap. Their missiles are costly. You may have to use a couple of million dollar missile to ntercept a cheap UAV or cheap short range missile.

So it is a fact that even the best of the best is not a foolproof answer to protect your country’s skies.

Air defence systems are there to decrease the amount of damage you may incur in the event of aerial bombing. Best defence is a good offence. A good offence that can take out your opponents AD systems and aerial assets, will be the best deterrent there is. They have to know that they will lose hell of a great deal more if they try to confront you.
For that we need to develop hypersonic weapons which will have hypersonic speeds at the terminal phase as they hit their targets.
Due to termİnal velocity law a ballistic missile’s terminal speed is limited by it’s weight and it’s aerodynamic design/drag coefficient.
An ICBM that weighs close to a 100ton can hit the target at speeds in excess of 8mach. Yet a ballistic missile like trg300 or Bora may only manage 1-2 mach at best.
Yet there are guided hypersonic artillery rounds that can be fired from howitzers. These have special design features that allow the projectile to have very low drag due to aerodynamic design. BAE Systems have tested these using 127mm naval guns. These rounds can have ranges close to 110 km. Where as an ESSM may cost 2 million dollars and a RAM 1 million, these rounds will be around 75-100K.
Because of the kinetic energy they carry they may not even need to carry explosives to cause destructive damage at the target.
View attachment 70022
View attachment 70024
View attachment 70023
Very good assessment in my opinion.

I remember talking about this a couple years ago with @Anmdt and @Cabatli_TR
 

Kaan Azman 

Well-known member
DH Visual Specialist
Messages
343
Reactions
22 1,366
Age
21
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
HVP's main design features that contribute to maintaining high speeds are

1-Sharp-angled cone: You would like to have a shockwave with angle close to your form angle, higher speeds result in sharper shock angles and they likely designed the front in accordance with the speeds it will experience.
2-Low friction materials: Other than form drag, friction of air contributes to a slow-down as much as the simple drag. You would like to have a very smooth surface to negate this, this is why you see some missiles with very well polished tips.
It is meant to be a cost-effective alternative but you still need highly resistant (Both to heat and stress) materials and find ways to process them efficiently.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,122
Solutions
1
Reactions
11 3,094
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Air defence systems are a must. We know that. But how good are they?

Israel boasts that their Iron dome is 85% efficient. Yet in reality this is lower. So much so that after the recent events, Israel refuses to give figures about the interception efficacy of their system.
We don’t have to talk about the Russian S300 and S400 systems. They have shown themselves to be easy targets in Ukraine.
US has multi layer systems like Patriots. Thaad and SM series missile systems that perform quite well. Yet van still be victims to missiles. Also these are not really a “Swiss Knife” type of defensive weapons that can be applied to all.

It is a fact that AD systems are not cheap. Their missiles are costly. You may have to use a couple of million dollar missile to ntercept a cheap UAV or cheap short range missile.

So it is a fact that even the best of the best is not a foolproof answer to protect your country’s skies.

Air defence systems are there to decrease the amount of damage you may incur in the event of aerial bombing. Best defence is a good offence. A good offence that can take out your opponents AD systems and aerial assets, will be the best deterrent there is. They have to know that they will lose hell of a great deal more if they try to confront you.
For that we need to develop hypersonic weapons which will have hypersonic speeds at the terminal phase as they hit their targets.
Due to termİnal velocity law a ballistic missile’s terminal speed is limited by it’s weight and it’s aerodynamic design/drag coefficient.
An ICBM that weighs close to a 100ton can hit the target at speeds in excess of 8mach. Yet a ballistic missile like trg300 or Bora may only manage 1-2 mach at best.
Yet there are guided hypersonic artillery rounds that can be fired from howitzers. These have special design features that allow the projectile to have very low drag due to aerodynamic design. BAE Systems have tested these using 127mm naval guns. These rounds can have ranges close to 110 km. Where as an ESSM may cost 2 million dollars and a RAM 1 million, these rounds will be around 75-100K.
Because of the kinetic energy they carry they may not even need to carry explosives to cause destructive damage at the target.
View attachment 70022
View attachment 70024
View attachment 70023
US military cancelled the ERCA programme this munition was going to be used with this year, after a test shot or two. Not sure what happened to the ERPA since then.
 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom