Baryshx
Contributor
Btw, That's what we were shown in the promotional videos.
I think we got catfishedBtw, That's what we were shown in the promotional videos.
Is this the same thing that happened with TF-X? Maybe in the end it will go well like TF-X.I think we got catfished
When I saw these for the first time, I said ''this is how an attack helicopter should be''. But here we are.Btw, That's what we were shown in the promotional videos.
We will probably bring a new look at the literature on this subjectI mean, the place of FLIR and machine gun doesn't make sense at all while even ordinary people know this, it sounds impossible for thousands of engineers to make a mistake in such a matter.
It is very unusual when we compare FLIR and machine gun location with AH-64, Mi-28 etc...
Well if so, will see that in the shooting tests.We will probably bring a new look at the literature on this subject
No, it was actually going on on its own timetable Atak 2.How to fuck up projects for political gain Im happy that didn't fuck up Hürjet
That flir placement and worksmanship looks nothing like the quality of Hürjet and Atak.No, it was actually going on on its own timetable Atak 2.
I think this photo was taken a long time ago.That flir placement and worksmanship looks nothing like the quality of Hürjet and Atak.
Even the prototype of TFX looks smooth
this time Its not me but lots of people too goodluck with that flir lmao
this time Its not me but lots of people too goodluck with that flir lmao
i think it is not prototype nor mock-up, it must be using for test purposes testing flir and gun. it is what a ugly design, it can not be, it musnt be prototype!
He is right about that
According to @VLS from the defenceturk forum, this is the official demo prototype.He said that there might be small changes in the mass production phase.i think it is not prototype nor mock-up, it must be using for test purposes testing flir and gun. it is what a ugly design, it can not be, it musnt be prototype!
You miss the point.People are criticizing because it doesn't look functional.Those who know say that there is a problem with the position of the barrel with the Flir.They say the muzzle flame will have a bad effect on the flir.Also that the angle of the gun can't look too high and because of that they say there can be only fire while the helicopter is hovering.I have always thought that the primary purpose of the weapons and weapons systems is to serve as deterrent or to kill someone. If it looks good, it is just for subjective feel good factor. The looks of these things are of no importance at all. Forming an opinion on the basis of some blurry pictures is a moot point, irrational completely.
For weapons od these types, the other things are important. The things as dependability, reliability, ease of maintenance, rank and file training, effectiveness of electronics and weapons systems and logistics. That's all to it. To debate about looks or the quality of workmanship on the PROTOTYPE is pretty meaningless. I can tell you from my experience , these things aren't used for a beauty contest
No. Instead, Mevlutoglu should stop jumping to judgements about projects based on a single blurry photo.I don't get peoples ignorance. Mr Mevlutoglu is a well known in this sector and even he find Atak 2 quite absurd. Some of you guys should stop being over defensive and be open for some criticism. We don't want this project to end up like Hürkuş. Mistakes should be eliminated from start till it gets too late.