Wouldn't that require TSK to change doctrine, I mean from what we've seen from the past few years doesn't inspire faith, not compared to TN and how they're making strides in updating their capabilities. I do understand that if TSK has deemed their current vehicles sufficient to beat back any enemy from our neighborhood, then that's it, but I am not sure if they manage to send the message over the border as well.
I mean the Land forces (KKK)
All the current IFV modernizations are more of an urgent need aimed at asymmetric threats in low intensity warfare.
After the IFV tender ends and the real acquisitions start we will see what really TSK's vision is. The tonnage of the vehicles, the tracked and wheeled options, the cannon calibre and turret choice will determine many things both for the doctrine, but also from a logistics point of view.
When I decided to comment on the issue I wanted to express my opinion on the industry part of things. I wanted to say that we are fully capable of developing such a system. Personally I don't think TSK will require a redesign tho. We may see some interesting additions to the designs and packages we are familiar with, but I don't we would see systems that we or TSK don't know. TSK regardless of its technology leap and the increasing capabilities of the industry is still a conservative structure in my opinion.
It is rumored that 2025 will be the "Land Forces" acquisition year. If God answers my prayers, we may finally see some movement in the right direction and many of our questions may be answered.
