TF-100 is the presumed 32x VLS Multi-Role AAW frigate to go between I-class and TF-2000.
Impressive
TF-100 is the presumed 32x VLS Multi-Role AAW frigate to go between I-class and TF-2000.
No CIWS on the top of the bridge thoughWhy so suprised ?!
Did u think Turkey to stay with 4x milgem and 4x i Class like denmark that has 0 problem with anyone ?! While small tiny country like Israel have 8+ frigates ? Or like Arap poor dictator egypt that buy weapons from everywhere ? i said before Turkey will build more than 16 I-class frigates and more than 9-11 Tf 2000 destroyers ready to fight same time italy-grecce- egypt-israel
What i said is becaming reality
The vertical architecture of Phalanx has long been obsolote since the rise of Aesa radars.Korean CIWS II with modern radar
Referring to what i have said weeks ago?
Turkey's planned surface combatants
- 4+4 Tf2000 8500 ton
- 4 Tf100 5000-5500 ton
- 4 Istif class
- 4 Barbaros MLU - Later, these ships will be replaced with Tf100 multi purpose frigates
- 4 Milgem
- 10 Heavy Armed OPVs
- 10 Fast Attack Craft
- 1 Intelligence ship
- 1 LHD
- 1 Drone carrier TCG Trakya
- 1 Aircraft carrier
Underwater combatants
- Milden submarine ~3000ton
- STM500 minisub ~500ton
@Anmdt
25 knots at that size.
My flotilla expectation would be rather like this, by 2035.Turkey's planned surface combatants
- 4+4 Tf2000 8500 ton
- 4 Tf100 5000-5500 ton
- 4 Istif class
- 4 Barbaros MLU - Later, these ships will be replaced with Tf100 multi purpose frigates
- 4 Milgem
- 10 Heavy Armed OPVs
- 10 Fast Attack Craft
- 1 Intelligence ship
- 1 LHD
- 1 Drone carrier TCG Trakya
- 1 Aircraft carrier
Underwater combatants
- Milden submarine ~3000ton
- STM500 minisub ~500ton
@Anmdt
For now it is my expectation bro, doğan + rüzgar + yıldız class have 10 hull in total which will retire soon (or some already did).In addition to 10 FACs (you wrote 14 FAC), new type of 6/7 FAC+ is a information or expectation bro
Cost effective alternative to fac55? Who says it? What makes it cost effective ?MPAC is a seperate design that STM has recently started working on without a demand from SSB. It mainly intended to be modular and provide a more cost effective alternative to FAC55
It is good because they are not very visible but they move slowly. I am also wondering about the current concept and the tradeoff between visibility, speed, recovery and the ability to loiter and conduct reconnaissance.
Would equipping some of our vessels with loitering ammo be beneficial ? E.g. Opv of lower tonnage. Granted the ammo has decent range