TR Naval Programs

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,458
Solutions
2
Reactions
114 24,635
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why so suprised ?!
Did u think Turkey to stay with 4x milgem and 4x i Class like denmark that has 0 problem with anyone ?! While small tiny country like Israel have 8+ frigates ? Or like Arap poor dictator egypt that buy weapons from everywhere ? i said before Turkey will build more than 16 I-class frigates and more than 9-11 Tf 2000 destroyers ready to fight same time italy-grecce- egypt-israel
What i said is becaming reality 😅🤣🇹🇷💪🇹🇷
No CIWS on the top of the bridge though :)
Next time ;).
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,458
Solutions
2
Reactions
114 24,635
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Korean CIWS II with modern radar

lig-nex1-to-introduce-new-close-in-weapon-system-for-republic-of-korea-navy-ships.jpg
The vertical architecture of Phalanx has long been obsolote since the rise of Aesa radars.
And i have my concerns on fixed aesa configuration on a moving/rotating gun foundation.
It is better to place the aesa for CIWS on else where ( to provide constant 360 degrees monitoring with back up ie. with a distributed architecture around the ship) , and place an aesa based tracking radar on ciws that ,in dual mode, can track and search an assigned sector.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,458
Solutions
2
Reactions
114 24,635
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Cabatli_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,360
Reactions
81 45,454
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Turkey's planned surface combatants
  • 4+4 Tf2000 8500 ton
  • 4 Tf100 5000-5500 ton
  • 4 Istif class
  • 4 Barbaros MLU - Later, these ships will be replaced with Tf100 multi purpose frigates
  • 4 Milgem
  • 10 Heavy Armed OPVs
  • 10 Fast Attack Craft
  • 1 Intelligence ship
  • 1 LHD
  • 1 Drone carrier TCG Trakya
  • 1 Aircraft carrier

Underwater combatants
  • Milden submarine ~3000ton
  • STM500 minisub ~500ton

@Anmdt
 

Spook

Contributor
Messages
607
Reactions
2,106
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
I hope we don't go for second LHD any time soon. I rather would have the resources used for finishing Milgem projects and most importantly Milden.
 

Glass🚬

Contributor
Messages
1,388
Reactions
2 3,159
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Turkey's planned surface combatants
  • 4+4 Tf2000 8500 ton
  • 4 Tf100 5000-5500 ton
  • 4 Istif class
  • 4 Barbaros MLU - Later, these ships will be replaced with Tf100 multi purpose frigates
  • 4 Milgem
  • 10 Heavy Armed OPVs
  • 10 Fast Attack Craft
  • 1 Intelligence ship
  • 1 LHD
  • 1 Drone carrier TCG Trakya
  • 1 Aircraft carrier

Underwater combatants
  • Milden submarine ~3000ton
  • STM500 minisub ~500ton

@Anmdt

and a massive fleet of various usv types with swarm functions.
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,010
Reactions
8 3,624
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
TF100 is only existing in name, it could possible be a more advanced I-class mod2 (as it is to replace the Barbaros class)
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,458
Solutions
2
Reactions
114 24,635
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Turkey's planned surface combatants
  • 4+4 Tf2000 8500 ton
  • 4 Tf100 5000-5500 ton
  • 4 Istif class
  • 4 Barbaros MLU - Later, these ships will be replaced with Tf100 multi purpose frigates
  • 4 Milgem
  • 10 Heavy Armed OPVs
  • 10 Fast Attack Craft
  • 1 Intelligence ship
  • 1 LHD
  • 1 Drone carrier TCG Trakya
  • 1 Aircraft carrier

Underwater combatants
  • Milden submarine ~3000ton
  • STM500 minisub ~500ton

@Anmdt
My flotilla expectation would be rather like this, by 2035.
4 TD-2000 + USV (ultimate goal and need)
6 TF-100 +USV (replacement for Gabya)
4 I-Class (replacement for Yavuz)
4 Ada Class -enhanced
10 OPV - mixed configuration + USV (Replacement for Burak class)
16 YTKB - enhanced + USV
6/7 FAC+ (a new class)
14 FAC (replacement of old FAC classes)
2 DIMDEG (replacement for old RAS)
4 LSS (replacement for old L + introduced new)
4 LST
TCG Anadolu
TCG Trakya (probably without a well deck which is converted to maintenance bay)
 

Cabatli_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,360
Reactions
81 45,454
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I have listed the total production units as the general target, bro, so I wrote Tf2000 as 4+4 but it is a very good list for the year 2035. In addition to 10 FACs (you wrote 14 FAC), new type of 6/7 FAC+ is a information or expectation bro? Btw, 6 Tf100 is logical number since Turkish fleet need expansion.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,458
Solutions
2
Reactions
114 24,635
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
In addition to 10 FACs (you wrote 14 FAC), new type of 6/7 FAC+ is a information or expectation bro
For now it is my expectation bro, doğan + rüzgar + yıldız class have 10 hull in total which will retire soon (or some already did).
Kılıç I & II class have 9, first 3 is going to retire by 2035 so i have thought of a replacement. in the following form, 6 large FAC with 45 knots top speed, 14+ medium FAC with 60 knots top speed to replace entire of the FAC classes. We can not verify this for now but i feel it will conclude this way.
 
Last edited:

Kaan Azman 

Well-known member
DH Visual Specialist
Messages
415
Reactions
26 1,724
Age
21
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
MPAC is a seperate design that STM has recently started working on without a demand from SSB. It mainly intended to be modular and provide a more cost effective alternative to FAC55
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,458
Solutions
2
Reactions
114 24,635
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
MPAC is a seperate design that STM has recently started working on without a demand from SSB. It mainly intended to be modular and provide a more cost effective alternative to FAC55
Cost effective alternative to fac55? Who says it? What makes it cost effective ?
Fac55 was not displayed in there either, and why?
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,174
Reactions
105 19,194
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey

Would equipping some of our vessels with loitering ammo be beneficial ? E.g. Opv of lower tonnage. Granted the ammo has decent range
It is good because they are not very visible but they move slowly. I am also wondering about the current concept and the tradeoff between visibility, speed, recovery and the ability to loiter and conduct reconnaissance.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom