TR TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,753
Reactions
94 9,081
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
Here, on top of the nose. ( left side from the pilot )
1669489611885.png
 
Last edited:

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,467
Reactions
14 2,802
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Yes, but we don't have a lot of options do we? That's why I was wondering if this thing exists on the F-16. I know there are two pressure relief doors on the F-14 (as far as I can remember).
Maybe it will be under the aircraft?
 

Windchime

Well-known member
Moderator
Professional
South Korea Moderator
Messages
419
Reactions
22 1,300
Nation of residence
Poland
Nation of origin
South Korea
I know BAE system has north American subsidiary!
But AN/ALQ94 is not an us product.
Because, it was developed in uk.
However, AN/ASQ-239 was developed by us subsidiary.
.
No, that's plain wrong.

During ATF, Sanders and GE were selected for the development of integrated EW suite of the ATF. Later both went through mergers like most of the US Aerospace and defense companies during the consolidation period and were sold to Lockheed and Martin Marietta respectively. Later they've merged into Lockmart and Lockmart sold their AES and CE division, which ended up as BAE ESI of today. So no, the AN/ALR-94 is not a British product. In fact, by now you'd know it wasn't even BAE product. Also, AN/ALQ-94 is a separate EW system to AN/ALR-94 and was used on F-111, though it was also developed by Sanders.
 

Windchime

Well-known member
Moderator
Professional
South Korea Moderator
Messages
419
Reactions
22 1,300
Nation of residence
Poland
Nation of origin
South Korea
A lot of folks here are putting heavy emphasis on MMU being purely Turkish, or close to purely Turkish but you've got to always remember and acknowledge the fact that MMU cannot be completely free of off the shelf parts from foreign aerospace suppliers. Aerospace industry is huge but small in the same time and has a globally intertwined ecosystem like any other heavy industry today. As long as certain part is not related to security concerns (eg. MMIC) it could always be beneficial to have a foreign supplier in terms of cost and risk management.
 

Rodeo

Contributor
Moderator
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
1,330
Reactions
31 5,067
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
A lot of folks here are putting heavy emphasis on MMU being purely Turkish, or close to purely Turkish but you've got to always remember and acknowledge the fact that MMU cannot be completely free of off the shelf parts from foreign aerospace suppliers. Aerospace industry is huge but small in the same time and has a globally intertwined ecosystem like any other heavy industry today. As long as certain part is not related to security concerns (eg. MMIC) it could always be beneficial to have a foreign supplier in terms of cost and risk management.
The problem is not that we have fetish of 100% Turkish content. The problem is to make the aircraft ITAR-free. The US or any other country shouldn't have the power to axe any export agreement TFX achieves in the future.
 

Cabatli_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,360
Reactions
81 45,455
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
A lot of folks here are putting heavy emphasis on MMU being purely Turkish, or close to purely Turkish but you've got to always remember and acknowledge the fact that MMU cannot be completely free of off the shelf parts from foreign aerospace suppliers. Aerospace industry is huge but small in the same time and has a globally intertwined ecosystem like any other heavy industry today. As long as certain part is not related to security concerns (eg. MMIC) it could always be beneficial to have a foreign supplier in terms of cost and risk management.

You're right but Turkish industry will push the limits of localization with aviation ecosystem it will create from TFX project. The TFX project will be global symbol of Turkiye's vision and strength and It is a must for our Turkic union that was formed with other Turk states and if this aircraft is not ITAR-Free, then it will not serve its purpose fully. That's why we set out with the aim of making almost everything domestic as much as we can, from the ejection seat to the canopy, from APU to turbofan engine, from ECU or hydraulic components to the fuel tank and radar, optics, EW, paint...etc
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,296
Reactions
96 11,839
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
AIM-9X I suppose.

It is Akdogan, and about 2.5 meters, may be even shorter than. It is a short-range mini AA missile with similar aerodynamic characteristics and agile maneuverability to Bozdoğan WVRAAM. Recent announcements have included information about plans to integrate this missile type with UAV systems, but Akdoğan mockup first appeared under the MMU mockup wing.

If we accept @Devence's idea about the bulk cross-section detail as correct, it could be an example of what kind of ammunition such a small pocket could carry. So this is all hypothetical, of course, and that gap is there probably for another purpose, but if it is for munitions, it could be a missile interceptor system for the MMU. I'm just thinking out loud.
 

Lool

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,918
Reactions
13 5,030
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Albania
I which world is F-35 more advanced than F-22?
Bigger number ≠ Better
The USA has a policy to not export their most adavnaced fighter jet in order to maintain their military superiority
Till this date, the US has refused to sell its F22 raptors to even the friendliest nations like Israel while initiating F35 sales like hotcakes

During Trump rule, he wanted to sell the F22 to Israel but the congress, pentagon and even the Senate refused as far as I heared. It is qyuite rare to have all such institutions (that are normally opposing each other) to actually agree on something unlese it is due to a decent reason ofcourse

We can keep arguing about which is better, but all of us deep inside knows that the F22 is better since the US refuses to sell it to anyone
 

Hasanrize

Committed member
Messages
191
Reactions
5 545
Nation of residence
Finland
Nation of origin
Turkey
The USA has a policy to not export their most adavnaced fighter jet in order to maintain their military superiority
Till this date, the US has refused to sell its F22 raptors to even the friendliest nations like Israel while initiating F35 sales like hotcakes

During Trump rule, he wanted to sell the F22 to Israel but the congress, pentagon and even the Senate refused as far as I heared. It is qyuite rare to have all such institutions (that are normally opposing each other) to actually agree on something unlese it is due to a decent reason ofcourse

We can keep arguing about which is better, but all of us deep inside knows that the F22 is better since the US refuses to sell it to anyone
They have 20 years of technology gap in between. F-22 being better than F-35 is against the nature of technology. If F-22 is better than the F-35, the USA should keep it for itself. But, they want to retire it, meaning that the USA doesn't even want to keep it for itself.

F-22 has a reputation for being the most advanced fighter, and this reputation is also its doom. They probably intentionally put F-35 behind F-22 in order to prevent it from the same doom. If they openly agree that F-35 is better than the F-22, there would be some congressmen who try to block its sales and eventually succeed, just like they did in the F-22.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom