Live Conflict Israel-US vs Iran War (2026)

4MikeEcho

Member
Messages
21
Reactions
1 46
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Tahiti
We're probably gonna see resumption in strikes once 2nd carrier strike group arrives near Iran, I don't see Iran giving up anything.
The $30Bn spent so far have resulted in $40BN damage in GCC countries, including the oil / gas installations. It does not include impact on their economy and material destruction and impact on economy in Israel.

I doubt the economics work out for us and our allies in this scenario.

As for second aircraft carrier, I call BS on it. A carrier and its F-18s don't project the sustained airpower projection needed. Our land-based assets have been in the area consistently as well as strategic bombers from UK.

I think the pause is worth it as every $ we spend is causing $3 of impact on the countries we are aligned with. They would say 'with a friend like that, who needs an enemy'. So I am glad we are at a pause, as temporary as it seems
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,567
Reactions
61 21,541
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Well, as long as there are pipelines that can transport the gas elsewhere iran is still able to get some form of income. And with the current prices they earn more per gallon or cubic than before the war.

This could put more pressure on Trump to do even more erratic things, and you can't ask for a better PR than that.

I am certain that Iran will meet just to meet for negotiations and stall for time, unless they can get what they want. War raparations, China / Russia as guarentor, and lifting of unlawful sanctions, and of course keep their nuclear power program.

The more they play ball, the more time goes and come november Iran and the world will know how strong or weakened Trump will become.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,567
Reactions
61 21,541
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey


___________________________________________________
Very smart of Iran, ships pay toll, and they are let go, so if US boards them then they'll have new problems. Let's see what happens.
 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
4,147
Reactions
28 11,074
Nation of residence
United Kingdom


___________________________________________________
Very smart of Iran, ships pay toll, and they are let go, so if US boards them then they'll have new problems. Let's see what happens.

I think all that will happen is the USA stops a couple of ships that paid the toll and then the rest will realise its pointless to pay the iranians if only the americans will stop them. If 1.4 billion china won't do anything about it, no one else can nor will.

Honestly the chinese seem really meek in the face of the USA.
 

contricusc

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
807
Reactions
17 1,227
Nation of residence
Panama
Nation of origin
Romania
Honestly the chinese seem really meek in the face of the USA.

There’s not much China can do. The US controls the oceans, and with that, it can control trade. China is dependent on imports of natural resources, which requieres open seas, and on exports of products, which again require open seas.

China is trade dependent, and the US has the power to stop trade flows everywhere in the world.

It doesn’t help that the US controls the global reserve currency and the financial markets as well. Their power is still very dominant, and nobody in his right mind would want to be in conflict with them.
 

Passenger

Well-known member
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
353
Reactions
8 666
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
I think all that will happen is the USA stops a couple of ships that paid the toll and then the rest will realise its pointless to pay the iranians if only the americans will stop them. If 1.4 billion china won't do anything about it, no one else can nor will.

Honestly the chinese seem really meek in the face of the USA.
China lacks both the ability and the willingness to engage face to US in military conflict outside of East Asia. This is a fact, and acknowledging it doesn't shame me.
And once China were involved, many of US's allies(such as Japan and Australia) would see this as disrupting the balance, they will do everythings they can to against China. It is not good for middle east.
Iranians can protect their country, all China need to do is to make US leader know the more time he wasted in Iran, the economy problem in US will get bigger.
All in all, what they did could not weaken China. This situation is enough to restrain US, making it inclined to avoid committing too much military force.
 

Slayer

Committed member
Messages
198
Reactions
2 352
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
China lacks both the ability and the willingness to engage face to US in military conflict outside of East Asia. This is a fact, and acknowledging it doesn't shame me.
And once China were involved, many of US's allies(such as Japan and Australia) would see this as disrupting the balance, they will do everythings they can to against China. It is not good for middle east.
Iranians can protect their country, all China need to do is to make US leader know the more time he wasted in Iran, the economy problem in US will get bigger.
All in all, what they did could not weaken China. This situation is enough to restrain US, making it inclined to avoid committing too much military force.
We need China to challenge the economical and military hegemony of US and Israel. However, I think you underestimate China. It's straight from Sun Tzu "Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak".

The world have finally awaken to the reality composed by the Epstein class. Pure evil. Hopefully, what goes around comes around.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
5,120
Reactions
19 5,216
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
China lacks both the ability and the willingness to engage face to US in military conflict outside of East Asia. This is a fact, and acknowledging it doesn't shame me.
And once China were involved, many of US's allies(such as Japan and Australia) would see this as disrupting the balance, they will do everythings they can to against China. It is not good for middle east.
Iranians can protect their country, all China need to do is to make US leader know the more time he wasted in Iran, the economy problem in US will get bigger.
All in all, what they did could not weaken China. This situation is enough to restrain US, making it inclined to avoid committing too much military force.
What a honest statement.
 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
4,147
Reactions
28 11,074
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
China lacks both the ability and the willingness to engage face to US in military conflict outside of East Asia. This is a fact, and acknowledging it doesn't shame me.
And once China were involved, many of US's allies(such as Japan and Australia) would see this as disrupting the balance, they will do everythings they can to against China. It is not good for middle east.
Iranians can protect their country, all China need to do is to make US leader know the more time he wasted in Iran, the economy problem in US will get bigger.
All in all, what they did could not weaken China. This situation is enough to restrain US, making it inclined to avoid committing too much military force.

I'm not saying China is meant to go to war. Turkiye is in NATO, we are on paper allied with the USA and much of Europe. Yet all the major players in that alliance will support our enemies. In the case of Syria the USA and Russia worked together against Turkiye, you could literally see them co-ordinate their military movements together to counter the various Turkish incursions. When Trump basically threatened erdogan with war, but Turkiye went in anyway the americans fled their positions which were protecting the PKK but made sure to hand them over directly to Russian forces instead.

When Turkiye downed a Russian jet, much of Europe actually sided with Russia against their NATO ally pulling away air defences from our border. The EU placed various sanctions and embargoes against us when we moved on Syria etc. I actually think that the russians seeing how cowardly the europeans behaved concerning a strong nation like Turkiye, probably incentivised their invasion of Ukraine expecting the Europeans would act like similar pussies. To be fair most of them did behave that way only to pretend they were on Ukraines side when they saw the Russians were not going to succeed there.

If a country like Turkiye small in size and resources comparatively to China can make it so the entire white man alliance won't get their way entirely, surely Chinese support could have made it so iran could have done much better then they are doing now. Not to mention the maduro fiasco.

Maybe its just a Turkish mindset, but i feel had we been 1.4 billion with your resources, we wouldnt give two shits for what the USA, Russia, or EU wanted. If all of them came together we still wouldnt give two shits for it. We would feel ourselves far too big and far too strong to listen to their bullshit let alone take it.
 

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,090
Reactions
21 2,820
Age
65
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
We're witnessing the end of a superpower before our very eyes. They will still be strong no doubt, but that aura they had decades back is gone almost completely.

Also not sure if Trump came to stop the rot or have US destroyed from within.
The United States intends to punish those NATO countries that did not support its joint military operation with Israel against Iran. This primarily concerns Spain, which refused to provide its airfields to the US Air Force.
As a punishment, Washington is considering suspending Spain's membership in NATO.

Notably, a few days ago, Netanyahu, in response to Spain's criticism of Israeli military actions in Gaza, announced his intention to punish Spanish Prime Minister Sánchez.

Besides Spain, it appears the UK will also be punished for its reluctance to support the US and Israel in the war against Iran. Possible options include a reconsideration of the US position on the Falkland Islands.

(For some reason, this all reminds me of Notes from a Madhouse.) 🙂

 
Last edited:

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,090
Reactions
17 1,473
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
The United States intends to punish those NATO countries that did not support its joint military operation with Israel against Iran. This primarily concerns Spain, which refused to provide its airfields to the US Air Force.
As a punishment, Washington is considering suspending Spain's membership in NATO.

Notably, a few days ago, Netanyahu, in response to Spain's criticism of Israeli military actions in Gaza, announced his intention to punish Spanish Prime Minister Sánchez.

Besides Spain, it appears the UK will also be punished for its reluctance to support the US and Israel in the war against Iran. Possible options include a reconsideration of the US position on the Falkland Islands.

(For some reason, this all reminds me of Notes from a Madhouse.) 😂

Trump seems to take the view that NATO forces are there to do what US forces do - carry out the wishes of the US C-in-C ie execute US foreign policy.

Attacking Iran may be US policy (because the US is following Israeli policy) but US foreign policy is not neccessarily the same as that of other countries in NATO.

Time for the Europeans to start thinking of switching to a defence alliance that does not include the US as a member, I think. Of course such an alliance will be much weaker than NATO but an alliance in which member countries are not permitted to pursue their own foreign policy is a pretty useless alliance to its members.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
6,351
Reactions
16,203
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
You're simply underestimating🙄

1. the enormity of Netanyahu's plan;
2. the depth of Hegseth's idiocy;
3. Trump's incomprehensible wisdom.
The US doesnt have the power to suspend any membership of NATO,nobody has.
You can only leave NATO by your own will.
No country can be kicked out of NATO.
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
670
Reactions
11 1,241
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Even if it were possible what would be the consequences for Spain or Nato?
Spain would just continue as usual as they are the least threatened Country.
The US would just continue to alienate friends and Allies destroying 80 Years of foreign policy.
 

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,090
Reactions
21 2,820
Age
65
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
The US doesnt have the power to suspend any membership of NATO,nobody has.
You can only leave NATO by your own will.
No country can be kicked out of NATO.
The U.S. doesn't have the right to do many things.

For example, kidnapping the president of a sovereign country from his bed in the middle of the night.
However...

1777036179805.jpeg
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,090
Reactions
17 1,473
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Someone from Trump's inner circle could tell him about the strategic value of Gibraltar 🙂
I hope that won't happen. The strait of Gibraltar is only 9 miles wide. I don't want the US navy blockading the strait, paralysing Europe-Asia trade until the king of Spain goes to Washington to kiss the king of America's feet.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom