TR Naval Programs

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,063
Reactions
12,587
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Most important part is AIP. Is there any update on where Türkiye's companies are with AIP?
''Turkish MILDEN are expected to use the AIP propulsion system. No decision has been made on what type will be used or whether a partnership will be formed. Currently, Gürbağ Savunma, known for its hydrogen-based solutions, is working on hydrogen-based propulsion systems for naval platforms in cooperation with STM. Considering Germany's counter-Turkiye stance on defence exports, cooperation with Siemens is the least likely option. However, with Spain's positive attitude to cooperation with Turkiye on naval platforms such as TCG ANADOLU (L-400) LHD and interest in further joint programmes, Abengoa, responsible for S-80 submarines' ethanol-based AIP system, might be an option. It is also known that companies such as ASPİLSAN and AYESAŞ have developed various AIP R&D projects. Establishing a stable development for MİLDEN's AIP system, whether fully local or partnership, is important to avoid programme delays.


Seas surrending Turkiye are not deep enough to hide nuclear powered submarines. The aircraft-carrier that Turkiye will construct will also open the country to open seas and oceans. The aircraft strike group requires submarine, It would not be a suprise if the submarine design is selected as nuclear powered one.


MİLDEN submarines will be larger than the current submarines in the Turkish Navy's inventory and possess a greater weapons capacity with eight torpedo tubes. Like the Reis class, they can use locally developed weapons like AKYA heavyweight torpedoes, Submarine-Launched ATMACA cruise missiles, and GEZGİN land-attack cruise missiles. Another important development for MİLDEN has been additional maintenance sites.''



 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,467
Solutions
2
Reactions
115 24,659
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Having clarified that point, it would be nice to know, if you would bring some light to the very fact that, why we are pursuing an inferior gun for our second batch of I-Class frigates. Would it not be more feasible to ask MKE to develop our “Super-Rapid” version?

You are correct in the fact that what makes the Italian Super Rapid come to it’s own are in fact, the Vulcano rounds with 40km range and the DART guided anti aircraft rounds.

Would one be correct in thinking that, for “conventional” use, there would be very little advantage in having a Super Rapid over the MKE version?
I think this is related to Navy's approach, 'let us equip our platforms with secured locally produced line of products, to begin with' and they have contributed a lot to the national 76mm, frankly i would say MKE is more of the branding factory.

I think for now they rely on the future expected programmable shells and smart fuses developed by national means.

I can't be certain on the efficasy of 120 rpm vs 80 rpm, but it is worse of the worse which i would rather not have. We should at least introduce atom 76, smart fuses (like this one).
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,467
Solutions
2
Reactions
115 24,659
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
''Turkish MILDEN are expected to use the AIP propulsion system. No decision has been made on what type will be used or whether a partnership will be formed. Currently, Gürbağ Savunma, known for its hydrogen-based solutions, is working on hydrogen-based propulsion systems for naval platforms in cooperation with STM. Considering Germany's counter-Turkiye stance on defence exports, cooperation with Siemens is the least likely option. However, with Spain's positive attitude to cooperation with Turkiye on naval platforms such as TCG ANADOLU (L-400) LHD and interest in further joint programmes, Abengoa, responsible for S-80 submarines' ethanol-based AIP system, might be an option. It is also known that companies such as ASPİLSAN and AYESAŞ have developed various AIP R&D projects. Establishing a stable development for MİLDEN's AIP system, whether fully local or partnership, is important to avoid programme delays.


Seas surrending Turkiye are not deep enough to hide nuclear powered submarines. The aircraft-carrier that Turkiye will construct will also open the country to open seas and oceans. The aircraft strike group requires submarine, It would not be a suprise if the submarine design is selected as nuclear powered one.


MİLDEN submarines will be larger than the current submarines in the Turkish Navy's inventory and possess a greater weapons capacity with eight torpedo tubes. Like the Reis class, they can use locally developed weapons like AKYA heavyweight torpedoes, Submarine-Launched ATMACA cruise missiles, and GEZGİN land-attack cruise missiles. Another important development for MİLDEN has been additional maintenance sites.''



I won't be too certain on gürbağ, Milden DPO negotiates with more serious and reliable actors ( ones who will not quit in 5 years or will be acquired or liquidified by any means) in regards of Milden project.

You can't rely to a newbie company backed by none of the giants when it is a strategic project.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,641
Reactions
52 4,712
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
IMG_20241025_181116.jpg

IMG_20241025_181151.jpg

IMG_20241025_181126.jpg



IMG_20241025_142033.jpg

IMG_20241025_142037.jpg

IMG_20241025_142026.jpg
 
Last edited:

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,258
Reactions
91 11,644
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
After the change in the TF-2000 weapon configuration, I was hoping that guided missiles could be launched with a vertical launch system in the TTHB project too, and perhaps the Hisar-D could be integrated into these corvettes in this way. But as expected, the canister launcher was not abandoned.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,293
Reactions
79 10,427
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
@Anmdt, Kozan Erkan claims Dearsan was awarded construction of 4 Hisar class OPVs. I think this is the first time we've heard of it.

 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,467
Solutions
2
Reactions
115 24,659
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yusuf Akbaba said it in June.
I knew it earlier but that was in the negotiation phase. They have finalized the agreement somewhere around September. SSB was meeting with multiple shipyards back then and i preferred to remain silent.

@Anmdt, Kozan Erkan claims Dearsan was awarded construction of 4 Hisar class OPVs. I think this is the first time we've heard of it.

It is 2 + 2 in fact, 2 are optional but likely to be fulfilled. It is possible that another shipyard will be assigned with remaining 4, to complete the series of 10.

Got some "legit" information on the matter, first of all it was not nice of the mentioned media to make this bit of information falsely into news, there is nothing more than a negotiation stage with Dearsan on a certain matter and it is not a done deal. Information leak could not be understood nicely in these conditions.

I will openly tell it when it is the time. :)

By the end of the procurement programme, there will be more than 10 OPVs.

And Dearsan will utilize a neighboring shipyard to fulfill the orders. They have got a tugboat and MCMW order currently.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,467
Solutions
2
Reactions
115 24,659
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Any chance those ships will employ USVs?
The design is available at Dearsan's website, but since those can deploy RHIB, could also deploy a USV within the SWL of the winch. They might also equip the ship with a heavier winch to support USV operations.

In my opinion there will be another MCMW project in the following years, where we will see a larger MCMW similar to Belgian design with multiple USV and UAV operations.

This is my source and more or less, the acquisition follows with a delay and shifts between the projects. NG-MH is given to Dearsan (for the first prototype that will go through evaluation) and will follow with MKT (MCMW) vessel designed / built either by Dearsan or another.
TF-100 was never I-Class. But let's pretend it is.

You don't simply build first of the optional hulls (either for TF-2000 or I-Class) in the military shipyard. TF-100 was a whole new design in the past, likely split in two and merged to I-Class and TF-2000 projects. Navy has got a way to get 8 more hulls (+4 TF-2000 and +4 I-Class) In place of the TF-100.

Previous formation has been;
4 I-Class (+4 Optional), 4 TF-2000 (+3 Optional) + 4 TF-100, which transformed to;
8 I+Class (+Options), 8 TF-2000 (+Options).

Also notice NG MCMW and NG MHV are separate projects. Dearsan has secured the deal for one of these, for prototype construction and one another will be conceptualized by another company in cooperation with the Navy DPO.

This was the SSB's plan earlier, each first hull of the new designs are to be built in military shipyards, and follow up orders are to be built by private shipyards. All in all TF-100 was a planned new design and let go in the last year.

The table is mostly valid as of 2024.


View attachment 71049
 
Last edited:

Tornadoss

Contributor
Messages
1,374
Reactions
4 2,619
Nation of residence
Czechia
Nation of origin
Turkey
I knew it earlier but that was in the negotiation phase. They have finalized the agreement somewhere around September. SSB was meeting with multiple shipyards back then and i preferred to remain silent.


It is 2 + 2 in fact, 2 are optional but likely to be fulfilled. It is possible that another shipyard will be assigned with remaining 4, to complete the series of 10.





And Dearsan will utilize a neighboring shipyard to fulfill the orders. They have got a tugboat and MCMW order currently.
DO we know when we can see the Navalized Gokbey?
 

Fairon

Well-known member
Messages
405
Reactions
6 990
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The design is available at Dearsan's website, but since those can deploy RHIB, could also deploy a USV within the SWL of the winch. They might also equip the ship with a heavier winch to support USV operations.

In my opinion there will be another MCMW project in the following years, where we will see a larger MCMW similar to Belgian design with multiple USV and UAV operations.

This is my source and more or less, the acquisition follows with a delay and shifts between the projects. NG-MH is given to Dearsan (for the first prototype that will go through evaluation) and will follow with MKT (MCMW) vessel designed / built either by Dearsan or another.

Wait, those OPV's will not be Hisar class and will be Dearsan's design?

If that is the case, I kinda think it is a step into right direction. If you standardized the systems, logistics wise it will be okay and using the different shipyards designs will help our civil naval shipyards when they enter tenders. If this system won't work, you only end up having less than ideal OPV fleet which is tolerable. If it will work though, I think it will benefit our Navy and naval industry in the future.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,594
Reactions
35 19,665
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Sounds confusing, I thought the Hisar OPV going to be built would be on Ada class design and it would be FFBNW types, making room for domestic hardware to be slappede on them.

If Dearsan is making them are there a chance these will be export class OPV, but are camouflaged as for own use ?
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,467
Solutions
2
Reactions
115 24,659
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Wait, those OPV's will not be Hisar class and will be Dearsan's design?

If that is the case, I kinda think it is a step into right direction. If you standardized the systems, logistics wise it will be okay and using the different shipyards designs will help our civil naval shipyards when they enter tenders. If this system won't work, you only end up having less than ideal OPV fleet which is tolerable. If it will work though, I think it will benefit our Navy and naval industry in the future.

This was the goal for a decade and they are finally achieving it. Both Navy and SSB relaxed a little and not stiff as in the past.

Sounds confusing, I thought the Hisar OPV going to be built would be on Ada class design and it would be FFBNW types, making room for domestic hardware to be slappede on them.

If Dearsan is making them are there a chance these will be export class OPV, but are camouflaged as for own use ?

It will be Hisar Class, but i don't know what will be left as FFBNW and what will be installed.

DO we know when we can see the Navalized Gokbey?
Better ask it to guys at TAI :)
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom