Latest Thread
One thing I would like to know why none of these interviewers ever ask the guy : “You are planning to serially produce Hurjet and Kaan. But have you guaranteed Supply of engines for these planes?“
First Kaan with a national engine will be delivered in 2032
You can watch the rest of the interview with English subtitles. Turn on subtitles and use auto translation. It does a good job.
Kaan will have its national engineOne thing I would like know why none of these interviewers ever ask the guy : “You are planning to serially produce Hurjet and Kaan. But have you guaranteed Supply of engines for these planes?“
From 2028 till 2032, until first domestic engined KAAN is delivered in 2032, there will be 40-60 KAANs produced with F110 engines. That is 90-130 engines from US (including spares). Those engines need congressional approval.Kaan will have its national engine
Aslo hurjet can be equiped with future Baykar 20k lbs engine or russian, chiba , europian one of US refuse to sell
Couldn't Spain get the engines for the Hürjet from the U.S.?@Yasar_TR
If the F110 engines cannot be procured, I believe we will have to resort to a rather risky course of action. That risky course is this: Delivering the Block 10 Kaans using immature TF35000 engines, which offer F110 thrust values. This would save the Kaan program from a complete collapse.
Even then, by my estimate, the Kaan program would be delayed by approximately two years. The first Kaans would be delivered in 2030, not 2028, at the best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, if the F404 engines cannot be procured, the Hürjet program would certainly collapse. Because, a) There is no money or manpower to redesign the aircraft, as Temel Kotil has said; and b) Developing a new engine would take 10 years, at the best!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe the USA will not finalize the F404 procurement until the fate of the Boeing T7 is clear. If T7 fails, i believe USA will deliver the F404s. Because in that case, the USA will also need Hürjet. I cannot predict what the USA will do regarding the F110. If the T7 doesn't fail, will the US deliver the F404s? Just like with the F110s, I can't predict that.
Where do the 40-60 numbers come from, source please?From 2028 till 2032, until first domestic engined KAAN is delivered in 2032, there will be 40-60 KAANs produced with F110 engines. That is 90-130 engines from US (including spares). Those engines need congressional approval.
Hurjet for TurAF needs at least 100 F404 engines. They too need congressional approval.
Without those US engines these two planes and their program are doomed and have to wait until domestic engines are ready.
For KAAN that is supposed to be 2032, provided there are no unforeseen delays.
For Hurjet, if Congress approval is not obtained, then best quick option is EJ200.
Can you really believe that a company like Baykar, who has never produced a jet engine before, never mind a turbofan, will be able to produce a 12000lbf dry thrust turbofan engine in such a short time? The guy is talking about serial production of 16 planes in 2026, when he has no guaranteed delivery of f404 engines. This is a class of engine only a handful of countries have the technology of. A company like Safran of France took exactly 10 years to produce a comparable engine in M88 that propels Rafale.
Our only option for Hurjet in the event of non delivery by US and no EJ200, for TEI to produce it after TF10000. (Or redesign Hurjet for twin TF10000 engines to save time)
There is no capability to use a plane like a drone, in any country on the planet, in a full combat situation. Just tests and plans.Couldn't Spain get the engines for the Hürjet from the U.S.?
If the KAAN is going to use the TF35000 engine while it's still immature, wouldn't it be better to give the KAAN the ability to operate as a drone fighter? That way, no pilot would be at risk in case of an incident."
That would take a lot of time as well though. They would have to start the whole design and testing processes from the very start and I don't see how it would be beneficial at all to go through all that for a trainer that could at best be a light fighter.(Or redesign Hurjet for twin TF10000 engines to save time)
Demiroglu’s and Kotil’s own comments. 2 per month production level is what they have been boasting. Then over 4 years … You do the math.Where do the 40-60 numbers come from, source please?
I think that's for FRP.2 per month production level is what they have been boasting
You say that, but all the 6th-generation fighter jets are planned to be operated both manually and autonomously, and they will cost more than $ 100 million per plane.There is no capability to use a plane like a drone, in any country on the planet, in a full combat situation. Just tests and plans.
And, risking a plane that cost 100 million dollars and precious resources like that is insane. And not just because of the loss of resources and time, but because you risk letting your enemy get their hands on it.
So you are either saying that :I think that's for FRP.
We shouldn't expect more than 20 for B10. We won't see more than a squadron before 2032-33. Production until new engine arrives will be a very slow LRIP production to get the first units out, further develop, keep the lights on.
They are being liberal with the truth as their audience where they make these claims is not us, air force or the outsiders but the public. That's the reason for conflicting claims.they are lying to us
If Trump wants Trump gets,proven many times before.If Trump really wants to lift CAATSA, are there enough republicans to achieve that?
That being said, the real issue still stands; where is the guarantee that these engines are going to be delivered?They are being liberal with the truth as their audience where they make these claims is not us, air force or the outsiders but the public. That's the reason for conflicting claims.
I don't expect more than 20 B10s to be produced.
TAI intentionally did that because there was not a huge demand for choppers after a certain amount was delivered to the TAF. There is still very low demand for attack choppers from the armed forces, which is why T-929 is not seen as a priority and put on the back burner, even though it is one step ahead of the T-129 when it comes to combat capability. TAI tried to keep the production line open as long as it could. This was a good decision as TAI managed to export some T-129s. TAI could have delivered all orders quickly with a production rate of 2.So you are either saying that :
1. they are lying to us and they won’t intentionally produce more than 4-5 per year. Or,
2. they are lying to us because they won’t be able to deliver the first B10 planes in 2028. Or,
3. They intend to sit on their laurels with respect to serial production until domestic engine is ready.
Even with extra slow production rates of last 4 years, Tusas managed to deliver 100 T129 Atak helicopters between 2014 to 2024. That is 10 per year in average. (Far shorter than their targeted 2 per month albeit at the height of production they did reach that rate)
Again,if Trump wants it to pass it will pass.But first it needs to pass congress and senate.
There are no guarantees. Engine supply is totally political and can be cut off at any point in time. Solidifying relations with US and not putting all eggs in basket is a must, I've been supporting the same for the last 5 years. We need F-16s to move forward to restart relations, F-35s to solidify the relations, engines to keep it turning and EF to have a backup.That being said, the real issue still stands; where is the guarantee that these engines are going to be delivered?