TR Propulsion Systems

[Zafer]

A look at TEI Piston Diesel engine performance. Power to weight ratio matters but fuel consumption per unit of power matters for endurance in the air and TBO hours matters for ease of maintenance.

 

[Strong AI]

We have become the first company in Turkey and one of the few in the world in the defense and aviation sector to receive the ISO 22301 Business Continuity Certificate!

The ISO 22301 Business Continuity Management System Certificate, which we obtained to take our commitment to business continuity across all our operations one step further and which covers all processes, was certified by BSI (British Standards Institution), one of the world’s leading audit and certification organizations, and was presented to our General Manager in a formal ceremony.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1925916102820802692

 

[Zafer]

Hard to tell if some of the TR Motor parts' images are photographed or computer generated. Seems like some of the accessory parts are already manufactured.

 

[Fuzuli NL]

Image does not belong to me
@Tr_Tech

 

[mTT]

TEI (@TEI_TUSAS) General Manager Prof. Dr. Mahmut Akşit:

It has been a while since we started the TS1400 GÖKBEY engine. We are completing the certification processes. This engine will be an internationally civilian certified engine. This means the following: It goes through the same processes as a passenger plane engine goes through.

When the certification process of the GÖKBEY engine is completed, we will have demonstrated that we can now make a passenger aircraft engine and certify it.

Civil certification is a very difficult process. Because it involves human life and has very strict rules. The engine has to pass some very difficult stages by proving it, and it has to do so in the presence of an international arbitrator.

'I did it, just sign here...' There is no such thing. You perform those tests one by one in the presence of the arbitrator, you show that the engine has successfully passed those difficult tests, and at the end they give a certificate saying 'This engine can carry civilian passengers'.

The process is almost over, we are almost there. We have exceeded 1740 horsepower in the engine. The maximum continuous power required by the helicopter is 1298 horsepower... In other words, we are in a position to fly the helicopter very comfortably.

We have also successfully completed the life tests stipulated by international standards, and our engine is still running. God forbid.

Once the civil certification process is completed, this engine will be sold together with GÖKBEY. Otherwise, our engine is already ready.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1932002321858236659

 

[Yasar_TR]

Image does not belong to me

Bro, I know the image is not yours. But I would like to add and comment on few of those engines and planes:

1. Akinci TP1400 engine is non existent. Yes TS1400 can be developed in to a turboprop engine. However they are not common place. Almost all good turboprops are axial flow. This is because Axial Flow turbines are more efficient and compact for turboprop engines, especially for larger engines where high thrust is needed.

2. TEI-TS3000 engine is also non existing. There may be a design of it. But to develop one now will take too long. We need engines now to fly those heavy helicopters. It has to be remembered that the TS3000 will have not much common with TS1400 as it will be an axial flow engine with multi compressor stages. When TEI has to manufacture TF35000 and TF10000 as a matter of national urgency and national pride, any other developments will have to wait.

3. Baykar’s 20000lbf class turbofan too is a long winded project. For a start, Baykar doesn’t have the know how and the set up to produce such a high powered and intricate turbofan engine. If they are counting on their Ukranian partners, that could also be a non starter as Motor Sich is heavily damaged in the war and doubtful they can produce anything new. Also in their past they have never produced anything even close to that thrust level. 6000lbf dry and 10000lbf wet is the maximum they have achieved in fighter jet turbofans using Soviet Era tech.
That means they may be counting on their new acquisition of Piaggio. But Piaggio is like TEI. They produce engine parts for RR, Honeywell and Pratt&Whitney. It will take a long time to develop a working engine, unless they buy one directly from these companies or licence produce one at Piaggio. Then, will they be allowed to use them on their Turkish production line?
That leaves TEI doing the work for Baykar. But what has precedence? TF35K or TF20K?
Listen to the man who knows what he is talking about! Prof Dr Aksit says 10-14 years needed to develop a turbofan.
I am sure someone like Seljuk Bayraktar is not bullshitting when he says they are going to produce a 20000lbf class turbofan. But there is a time limit about how quickly you may do that. So these pictures are a little too early to be of significance.

4. TF6000 and TF10000 may look like essentially the same. But as mentioned by Dr Aksit, the TF10000 need to be produced to a higher specification than it’s non AB brother. As the AB kicks in the sudden jolt on parts of the engine can be damaging and catastrophic if parts can not withstand it. So TF10000 is a very high spec version of the TF6000.
Also, although one could think that Anka3 is a flying wing and flying wings don’t go supersonic and TF6000 should suffice; But Anka 3 being a deep strike weapon and designed to carry a number of heavy bombs, it needs to have a lot of thrust at take off. Hence the after burner complement. (A bit like Concorde; afterburner assisted take-off and non AB flight)

 

[Merzifonlu]

I have a question. Approximately how long would it take to derive a turboprop engine from the TS-1400? I assume there are no problems with financial resources and trained manpower.

 

[mTT]

I have a question. Approximately how long would it take to derive a turboprop engine from the TS-1400? I assume there are no problems with financial resources and trained manpower.

4-5 years

 

[Yasar_TR]

I have a question. Approximately how long would it take to derive a turboprop engine from the TS-1400? I assume there are no problems with financial resources and trained manpower.

Radial flow turboprops are only good if you are using them for low rate loading. When you need high load handling and require high thrust , then axial flow turboprop is the way.

If we look at a PT6 engine lay out, it is very different to our TS1400.

There is a 4th compressor that is radial flow. This is to regulate the incoming compressed air in to the combustion chamber. Most turboshaft engines have this too (like the T700)

Graphically:

Yet, it is possible to produce a turboprop from TS1400 for a low power turboprop.

But you can’t just take TS1400 and attach a propeller to it.
It needs extensive work. And at the end of it it may not be worth the hassle.
It is anybody’s guess how long it would take to produce a turboprop from TS1400.

However, it is certain that it would take shorter to develop our T700 with 3000HP output from the GE’s T700, as we did with CTS800 to TS1400; and call it TS3000
Similarly it can be downsized to a TP1500.

 

[Zafer]

Every engine you make halves the time to the next new engine.

TEI made the TS1400 of which certification is almost complete. TEI made the TF6000 engine into an employable state for prototype planes. TF10000 is not far away. TF35000 is less than 2 years to ignition. There is lots of know how learned along the way. So first ignition of a new turboprop should not be any more than 3 years away. Considering especially that you will employ it on unmanned and military aircraft.

 

[Merzifonlu]

Thank you for answers.

 

[Strong AI]

Is this a teaser?

Are you ready to power up with TRMOTOR, the developer of Turkey’s first indigenous and national auxiliary power units? ✈

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1934947183415222584

 

[mTT]

Is this a teaser?

Are you ready to power up with TRMOTOR, the developer of Turkey’s first indigenous and national auxiliary power units? ✈

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1934947183415222584

Auxiliary Power Unit - APU60​

Technical Specification	Value

Applications	Civil and Military Aircraft
Weight	95 kg
Electric Power	Sea Level Static ISA: 40 kVA
Service Ceiling	30,000 ft
Customer Air	Sea Level Static ISA: 0.93 kg/s at 370 kPa

Auxiliary Power Unit - APU40

Technical Specification	Value
Weight	95 kg
Electrical Power	Sea Level Static ISA: 40 kVA
Service Altitude	30,000 ft
Customer Air	Sea Level Static ISA: 0.93 kg/s at 370 kPa
Applications	Civil and Military Aircraft

 

[boredaf]

Is this a teaser?

Are you ready to power up with TRMOTOR, the developer of Turkey’s first indigenous and national auxiliary power units? ✈

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1934947183415222584

They are just tooting their own horn, nothing more. They've done this before mate, you should remember.

 

[Strong AI]

They are just tooting their own horn, nothing more. They've done this before mate, you should remember.

Bro they already posted in the past about their APU's and i can't actually remember that they posted something similiar like a "teaser".
Also next month is IDEF 25, so maybe they will show a mockup of TF35000, which could mean they are right on track with its development.

 

[hugh]

From TAI CEO:

"We [have] already started working on” the new TF35000 turbofan engine, Mehmet Demiroğlu, general manager at TAI, told Breaking Defense at Le Bourget, adding that work is being done jointly by Tusas Engine Industries (TEI) and TRMotor. As part of the system’s preliminary design phase, a “conceptual design is almost done,” he added, “and then it will go to initial prototyping maybe by the end of the year."

Additionally, Demiroğlu said that “some early testing” of the powerplant is planned in 2026 and integration on KAAN could be a reality starting in 2032.

This should recalibrate the expectations after Kotil's frequent, unrealistic 2028 FF timeline.

Turkish Aerospace eyes full development of local KAAN fighter jet engine by 2032 - Breaking Defense

KAAN flight tests currently feature General Electric's F110 turbofan engine, but Ankara has long prioritized a local alternative to reduce dependency on overseas suppliers.

breakingdefense.com

 

[Oublious]

From TAI CEO:

"We [have] already started working on” the new TF35000 turbofan engine, Mehmet Demiroğlu, general manager at TAI, told Breaking Defense at Le Bourget, adding that work is being done jointly by Tusas Engine Industries (TEI) and TRMotor. As part of the system’s preliminary design phase, a “conceptual design is almost done,” he added, “and then it will go to initial prototyping maybe by the end of the year."

Additionally, Demiroğlu said that “some early testing” of the powerplant is planned in 2026 and integration on KAAN could be a reality starting in 2032.

This should recalibrate the expectations after Kotil's frequent, unrealistic 2028 FF timeline.

Turkish Aerospace eyes full development of local KAAN fighter jet engine by 2032 - Breaking Defense

KAAN flight tests currently feature General Electric's F110 turbofan engine, but Ankara has long prioritized a local alternative to reduce dependency on overseas suppliers.

breakingdefense.com

This is in line with the Indonesian orders...

 

[No Name]

From TAI CEO:

"We [have] already started working on” the new TF35000 turbofan engine, Mehmet Demiroğlu, general manager at TAI, told Breaking Defense at Le Bourget, adding that work is being done jointly by Tusas Engine Industries (TEI) and TRMotor. As part of the system’s preliminary design phase, a “conceptual design is almost done,” he added, “and then it will go to initial prototyping maybe by the end of the year."

Additionally, Demiroğlu said that “some early testing” of the powerplant is planned in 2026 and integration on KAAN could be a reality starting in 2032.

This should recalibrate the expectations after Kotil's frequent, unrealistic 2028 FF timeline.

Turkish Aerospace eyes full development of local KAAN fighter jet engine by 2032 - Breaking Defense

KAAN flight tests currently feature General Electric's F110 turbofan engine, but Ankara has long prioritized a local alternative to reduce dependency on overseas suppliers.

breakingdefense.com

What wasn't it always 2032?

2028/2029 was meant to be the first time it was tested alongside an General Electric F110 engine if i remenber currently.

 

[hugh]

What wasn't it always 2032?

2028/2029 was meant to be the first time it was tested alongside an General Electric F110 engine if i remenber currently.

integration on KAAN means it will be tested alongside F110.

btw, he says integration, not first flight. the latter could be in the same year or later depending on its readiness.

 

[TheInsider]

What wasn't it always 2032?

2028/2029 was meant to be the first time it was tested alongside an General Electric F110 engine if i remenber currently.

Yes, you remember it correctly, and that hasn't changed. In fact, the TAI CEO's mention of early tests in (by the end of) 2026 is confirmation of that. We announced here that early tests might start in 2026, when no other forum or news outlet reported. Increased interest in KAAN project also shows that possible customers are convinced about the roadmap, and the engine project is on track. According to the current roadmap/projection, flight tests will start in the first half of 2030 at the worst-case scenario. Mechanical fitting/integration will start in late 2028 at the earliest.

BTW mass production contract of TS-1400 might be signed this year or early 2026. There is a slim chance it might be signed at IDEF. The certification process is mostly completed.